Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Gods Are Laughing at the SCOTUS
http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2012/1/29/103940/975The Gods Are Laughing at the SCOTUS
by BooMan
Sun Jan 29th, 2012 at 10:39:40 AM EST
In 2008, as volunteers for the Obama campaign, CabinGirl and I went down to Obama headquarters and got a walk sheet on election day. We were assigned to Coatesville, Pennsylvania, and we went out and knocked on the doors of registered Democrats to make sure they had voted or knew where to vote. While we were doing that, we kept tripping over members of the SEIU who were canvassing the same neighborhoods, and for the same purpose. We were needlessly duplicating our efforts and annoying voters at the same time. The problem was created because the Obama campaign couldn't coordinate with the unions. This year, Republicans are having the same problem on steroids with the Super PACs. Mitt Romney has a traditional campaign. Ron Paul has a hybrid campaign that resembles an underfunded traditional campaign. Santorum and Gingrich are running Super PAC campaigns.
The super PAC backing Santorums presidential campaign, Red White and Blue Fund, has reported spending more than $340,000 on a phone-banking operation it started during the South Carolina primary. Its placed 1.5 million so-called voter identification calls in Florida, and is also targeting Florida voters with three direct mail pieces, touting him as among other things the right choice for Florida Republicans. And its planning to release a memo this week laying out a path through which Santorum, a former Pennsylvania senator whos trailing Romney and Gingrich in polls, can compete for the nomination precisely the kind of thing that campaigns often do to try to influence media coverage.
But the super PAC supporting Gingrich, Winning Our Future, has perhaps the most ambitious organizing plans. While its only reported spending about $240,000 on phone banking a tiny fraction of the $6 million its spent mostly on ads attacking Romney it has trumpeted its intention to build a shadow campaign of sorts to boost the former House Speaker. It plans to set up field operations and hire state directors in Florida, Nevada, Minnesota, Arizona and California, and has begun purchasing voter files and courting the state operations built by the now-aborted presidential campaign of Texas Gov. Rick Perry.
But the super PAC supporting Gingrich, Winning Our Future, has perhaps the most ambitious organizing plans. While its only reported spending about $240,000 on phone banking a tiny fraction of the $6 million its spent mostly on ads attacking Romney it has trumpeted its intention to build a shadow campaign of sorts to boost the former House Speaker. It plans to set up field operations and hire state directors in Florida, Nevada, Minnesota, Arizona and California, and has begun purchasing voter files and courting the state operations built by the now-aborted presidential campaign of Texas Gov. Rick Perry.
These Super PACs are moving beyond airing negative advertisements to doing the traditional work of political campaigns, but they are not legally allowed to coordinate with the real political campaigns. When they're buying ads, they can see from public records where the real campaigns are spending money and then fill in the gaps. But they can't see where the campaigns are sending direct mail or canvassing. They can't share feedback from the canvassing campaigns, which would allow them to identify households that should not be visited again.
Even worse, from a political coordinator's point of view, these Super PACs can't attract volunteers, so they have to pay for canvassers. This produces door-knockers who are untrained and have no real commitment to the candidate. It's not only horribly wasteful and inefficient, it is also as likely to alienate voters as to attract them. Voters are getting too much contact, and it's not quality contact. It's probably better than nothing, but only barely so.
I need to go back and read the majority decision in Citizens United so I can mock their reasoning. I wonder what they think now that they can see a campaign like Gingrich's which has been outsourced almost completely to an unaccountable Super PAC.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1502 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Gods Are Laughing at the SCOTUS (Original Post)
babylonsister
Jan 2012
OP
BzaDem
(11,142 posts)1. The truth is that the 5 members of the Citizens United majority believe that coordination bans and
even contribution limits are unconstitutional. Kennedy himself has said as much in many opinions in the past.
They just weren't willing to come out and say that in Citizens United. (Yet.)
MADem
(135,425 posts)2. Gee, there's a helluva job! Democrats should apply for these paid canvasser jobs!
They'd get minimum wage, anyway, and be able to "spread the message!"
Newt's crew: "Yes, he believes in freedom--he freely married THREE TIMES!"
Mitt's crew: "Oh, Mitt loves dogs--here's a Globe article about how he wouldn't leave his setter behind when he went on vay-cay!"
Drale
(7,932 posts)3. The Gods are way to busy
making it impossible for me to find a girl that I really like who likes me as well, they don't have time to deal with the President.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)4. The girl is out there. She'll find you.
That's the best way, trust me.
Drale
(7,932 posts)5. It was more of a joke but
I know that, but thats for the encouragment.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)6. I got lucky. Mine found me in '84.
I'd had some excellent girlfriends prior to that, but with her I just knew.