Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

drokhole

(1,230 posts)
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 01:07 AM Feb 2012

Clint, in Nov. 2011: "We shouldn't be bailing out the banks and car companies."

Full quote:

"I'm a big hawk on cutting the deficit. I was against the stimulus thing too," he said. "We shouldn't be bailing out the banks and car companies. If a CEO can't figure out how to make his company profitable, then he shouldn't be the CEO."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/09/clint-eastwood-herman-cain_n_1083627.html

Just remember, folks - it's all a big fucking illusion. They know how to manipulate your emotions. Noam Chomsky had it right when he called it "perception management."

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clint, in Nov. 2011: "We shouldn't be bailing out the banks and car companies." (Original Post) drokhole Feb 2012 OP
Sounds like Romney. nt gateley Feb 2012 #1
The worse American industry does, the more he can skim them for. /nt Saving Hawaii Feb 2012 #2
Maybe this is his way of saying that he was wrong? Firebrand Gary Feb 2012 #3
That's how I read that commercial. CakeGrrl Feb 2012 #4
It's a commercial. He was paid handsomely for it. drokhole Feb 2012 #5
Exactly. Son of Gob Feb 2012 #6
Clint would have done that on principal. Firebrand Gary Feb 2012 #16
+1 whatchamacallit Feb 2012 #22
It's a very good commercial The Traveler Feb 2012 #7
Or was it a way to defang OWS? Mojorabbit Feb 2012 #21
The difference: the car companies paid theirs back. The banks gave it to the criminal executives. Initech Feb 2012 #8
the opposite is true. GM/Chrysler are still in the hole while the big banks repaid in full banned from Kos Feb 2012 #18
Anyone who cares what a person who is paid to pretend to be something he isn't, or Ikonoklast Feb 2012 #9
I highly doubt that he even wrote the script for that commercial. Lugnut Feb 2012 #10
Of course not. This was an advertisement for Chrysler. They have multi million$$ ad accounts hlthe2b Feb 2012 #14
Well, the freepers think it was an Obama ad Obamacare Feb 2012 #11
Just a small request... hlthe2b Feb 2012 #15
Well, if he was paid well for anything artificial, it backfired.. Ecumenist Feb 2012 #12
Clint was a PAID spokesman in the ad... Do you not get that? hlthe2b Feb 2012 #13
Clint was also mayor of a pricey tourist trap for a while. mulsh Feb 2012 #17
Yes he was and he is an old school Republican in "real life"... hlthe2b Feb 2012 #19
If I remember correctly, Eastwood is a repuke. nt Javaman Feb 2012 #20
yes, always. No surprise there. n/t librechik Feb 2012 #23

Saving Hawaii

(441 posts)
2. The worse American industry does, the more he can skim them for. /nt
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 01:22 AM
Feb 2012

Hopefully they all fail and our good folks in the murders and executions... erm, mergers and acquisitions department make tons of money selling off the assets.

Firebrand Gary

(5,044 posts)
3. Maybe this is his way of saying that he was wrong?
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 01:23 AM
Feb 2012

We have all made mistakes. At least I know I have, even right here on DU.

CakeGrrl

(10,611 posts)
4. That's how I read that commercial.
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 01:31 AM
Feb 2012

Singing the praises of the auto companies that President Obama helped save is as clear a change of mind as he could make after his previous quote.

drokhole

(1,230 posts)
5. It's a commercial. He was paid handsomely for it.
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 01:32 AM
Feb 2012

It's his way of saying "thanks for the money, here's my gritty voice and artificial gravitas."

 

The Traveler

(5,632 posts)
7. It's a very good commercial
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 01:46 AM
Feb 2012

And Eastwood is a very good actor. I cannot speculate that this fits in with his political views, or his current take on things. He is an actor. From what I know of his views, I am not overly impressed with his politics.

The commercial itself ... I think it broaches a topic we all think about ... the divisions in our society and the need to get past them if we are to "win in the second half". Of course, that can be tough when there is a significant minority of folks who are willing to burn the country down if they don't get their way imposed on the rest of us.

Trav

Mojorabbit

(16,020 posts)
21. Or was it a way to defang OWS?
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 01:12 PM
Feb 2012

I would love to know the backstory on it. It felt like a national pep talk. I did not watch the game but wandered into the living room as the commercial started. I found the acting wonderful and I found the commercial itself odd.

 

banned from Kos

(4,017 posts)
18. the opposite is true. GM/Chrysler are still in the hole while the big banks repaid in full
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 09:44 AM
Feb 2012

plus interest.

Bank of America $45 billion borrowed and repaid $49.5 billion (for example).

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
9. Anyone who cares what a person who is paid to pretend to be something he isn't, or
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 02:06 AM
Feb 2012

say the words written for him by another person, needs to re-think what it is actors do for a living.


I'd be willing to bet that if I gave him, or any actor for that matter enough money, he'd bark like a dog for me.

That's why I don't give much weight or credence to the political musings of any actor, any moreso than a random person on the street's opinion.

Lugnut

(9,791 posts)
10. I highly doubt that he even wrote the script for that commercial.
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 02:13 AM
Feb 2012

Clint is a very talented actor who has been paid very well for pretending to be someone he isn't in real life.

hlthe2b

(102,292 posts)
14. Of course not. This was an advertisement for Chrysler. They have multi million$$ ad accounts
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 09:02 AM
Feb 2012

Clint was a PAID spokesman--an actor in the ad. Geez, I can't believe some of the misperceptions people are taking from this.

hlthe2b

(102,292 posts)
15. Just a small request...
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 09:16 AM
Feb 2012

I appreciate your taking the "hit" to go over there and check out the reaction, but could you post a few representative comments? I vowed long ago never to go back over there and I know many here feel the same.

It's ok. We'll be here with a full decontamination kit to clean you back up in a jiffy.

Ecumenist

(6,086 posts)
12. Well, if he was paid well for anything artificial, it backfired..
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 04:22 AM
Feb 2012

It really sounds as if he is STRONGLY implying that Obama deserves a second term as he's only halfway through his mission.

hlthe2b

(102,292 posts)
13. Clint was a PAID spokesman in the ad... Do you not get that?
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 09:01 AM
Feb 2012

It is not necessarily conveying his POV. That's what actors do. And, the fact is this ad for Chrysler products is very effective--for Democrats.

mulsh

(2,959 posts)
17. Clint was also mayor of a pricey tourist trap for a while.
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 09:40 AM
Feb 2012

Just though your astute post could use a bit of additional info.

hlthe2b

(102,292 posts)
19. Yes he was and he is an old school Republican in "real life"...
Mon Feb 6, 2012, 09:48 AM
Feb 2012

But, like most actors, they separate professional activities from personal. He may have had a change of his personal attitudes in doing this commercial--or he may merely be doing it as a paid spot. Regardless, the commercial is one hell of an effective one--for Democrats. That comes of a good actor.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Clint, in Nov. 2011: &quo...