General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums(Rep. Hoekstra - R/MI) Latest Candidate To Run Xenophobic Ad Showing Prejudiced Chinese Stereotype
In what has become a sad, bipartisan exercise, an increasing number of campaigns are using xenophobic Chinese stereotypes in advertisements to try to gin up nativist sentiment among voters.
During the 2010 campaign, then-Rep. Zack Space (D-OH) began the recent trend with an ad supposedly depicting a parade in China the actual footage was of Asian Americans in San Francisco and a tagline thanking his opponent: As they say in China, xie xie Mr. Gibbs! An anti-spending front group, Citizens Against Government Waste, followed suit with a cryptic ad raising the prospect that our national debt would cause Americas economic downfall and soon force us to work for the Chinese. Most reprehensibly, Mark Amodei ran an ad in a Nevada special election depicting a Chinese military invasion in front of the U.S. Capitol building as it flies the Chinese flag.
Former Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R-MI), currently running to unseat Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-MI), is the latest to try to stoke anti-Chinese fears for political gain. His new ad, entitled Now, shows a woman in whats meant to be rural China speaking broken English and thanking Stabenow because we take your jobs. Your economy get very weak, ours get very good, the woman says. Hoekstras mock website hosting the ad features Chinese characters adorned with two Chinese flags. Watch it:
These ads are not-so-subtly intended to provoke nativist fears, and do so by purveying unfortunate stereotypes. Yet despite Hoekstras fear-mongering, the fact remains that China still holds just 9.5 percent of the United States debt, over four times less than what American bondholders own.
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2012/02/06/419235/pete-hoekstra-xenophobic-ad/
The portrayal of a young Asian woman speaking broken English in a Super Bowl ad being run by U.S. Senate candidate Pete Hoekstra against Michigan incumbent Debbie Stabenow is bringing charges of racial insensitivity.
GOP consultant Nick De Leeuw flat-out scolded the Holland Republican for the ad. Stabenow has got to go. But shame on Pete Hoekstra for that appalling new advertisement, De Leeuw wrote on his Facebook page Sunday morning. Racism and xenophobia arent any way to get things done.
The nonpartisan Asian & Pacific Islander American Vote groups Michigan chapter said it was deeply disappointed by the ad, noting that the Asian-American community is a major contributor to Michigans economy. ... It is very disturbing that Mr. Hoekstras campaign chose to use harmful negative stereotypes that intrinsically encourage anti-Asian sentiment, the group said in a statement.
Democrats were quick to challenge the premise of the ad, referring to Hoekstras 18 years in the U.S. House and the fact that he joined a Washington-based law and lobbying firm last year.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/hoekstra-super-bowl-ad-raises-racial-sensitivity-questions-with-language-references-to-china/2012/02/05/gIQAabZNsQ_story.html
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)of the slimy, conniving and totally without scruples Rethuglican politician. Even his own colleagues distrust him.
Moonwalk
(2,322 posts)Because we borrowed from them to help pay for our wars? Wasn't that Bush's brilliant strategy? Borrow the money for the wars instead of raising taxes so people wouldn't object to them? Never mind having to pay the price later. And aren't we losing jobs to China because we allow corporations to ship those jobs rather than making corporations pay if they don't do the work in the U.S.? And isn't that all thanks to Republicans and their eight, Bush dominating years in power?
I mean, it seems to be insult added to injury here. Not only are the ads racially offensive, but they're blaming the wrong political party for the situation!
RevStPatrick
(2,208 posts)...you know, the people who would actually vote for slime like Hoekstra, don't know that!
They only know "Obama bad! Dumbocrats BAD!!!"
Moonwalk
(2,322 posts)...to convince them to vote Repuke. The ad has to be trying to change the minds of those who might not vote for Hoekstra.
gopiscrap
(23,761 posts)hope this helps sink him!!!
amandabeech
(9,893 posts)H. probably is getting a large amount of money from the De Vos Amway fortune plus a lot of very religious folks in the Grand Rapids, Michigan area.
I grew up in his former congressional district. No one decent comes out of the Michigan 9th distrist. And I mean ever.
The GR wing of the pubbies, however, often puts out candidates that are unpalatable to the rest of the pubbies in the State.
Against Stabenow, I don't see the idiot H. doing particularly well.
pampango
(24,692 posts)It is hard to decide what is the most despicable thing about senatorial Republican hopeful Pete Hoekstras Superbowl ad attacking rival Democratic Senator Debbie Stabenow. The ad has a Chinese young woman speaking broken English and gloating about the indebtedness of the US to China and the export of US jobs to China. Given the ugly history in Michigan of Asian-bashing over economic competition in the automobile industry and the 1982 murder of Vincent Chin in Detroit, Hoekstras ad is incendiary and has offended right-thinking people in both major political parties.
Although the controversy that ensued mostly focused on the scapegoating of Asians and Asian-Americans for current US economic difficulties, there are other heavy duty issues in the ad.
The current US deficit was primarily the work of the Republican majority under George W. Bush, as this chart demonstrates:
Hoekstra and his colleagues voted to go to war with Iraq, which was an unfunded war, most of the so far $1 trillion price tag being borrowed. Hoekstra and his colleagues voted to cut taxes on the rich, much reducing revenues. And Hoekstra and his colleagues voted for an unfunded Medicare prescription benefit. The tax cuts on the rich have gone on raising the deficit every year since enacted by hundreds of millions of dollars. Hoekstra voted for the TARP bailout. Iraq was still costing billions in 2011. And the Medicare prescription benefit likewise. Hoekstras votes are an ongoing budget disaster, long after he got out of government.
http://www.juancole.com/2012/02/hoekstra-blames-everyone-but-himself-for-the-deficits-he-voted-for.html
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)amandabeech
(9,893 posts)My guess is that he and his staff know that this is offensive.
They just don't care.
gulliver
(13,186 posts)The leading proponents of unregulated corporations have no business talking about job losses to China. The appeal to racism disguises a lie.