HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Senator adds “Every Sperm...

Fri Feb 10, 2012, 01:25 PM

Senator adds “Every Sperm is Sacred” amendment onto Oklahoma personhood bill

http://feministing.com/2012/02/09/senator-adds-every-sperm-is-sacred-amendment-onto-oklahoma-personhood-bill/

Senator adds “Every Sperm is Sacred” amendment onto Oklahoma personhood bill
By Vanessa | Published: February 9, 2012


Amazing. After Oklahoma conservatives introduced a “personhood” bill to the state Senate on Monday, Sen. Constance Johnson decided to follow in Virginia Senator Janet Howell’s footsteps and attach an amendment in protest, which would add this language to the bill:

However, any action in which a man ejaculates or otherwise deposits semen anywhere but in a woman’s vagina shall be interpreted and construed as an action against an unborn child.

Jezebel adds that another pro-choice senator added an amendment:

Another pro-choice legislator, Democrat Jim Wilson, attempted to add an amendment to the bill that would require the father of the child to be financially responsible for the woman’s health care, housing, transportation, and nourishment while she was pregnant.

..more..

17 replies, 3216 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 17 replies Author Time Post
Reply Senator adds “Every Sperm is Sacred” amendment onto Oklahoma personhood bill (Original post)
G_j Feb 2012 OP
russspeakeasy Feb 2012 #1
Angry Dragon Feb 2012 #2
russspeakeasy Feb 2012 #4
dipsydoodle Feb 2012 #5
madinmaryland Feb 2012 #15
dipsydoodle Feb 2012 #16
sarcasmo Feb 2012 #3
newspeak Feb 2012 #7
G_j Feb 2012 #9
LynneSin Feb 2012 #12
LeftinOH Feb 2012 #6
titaniumsalute Feb 2012 #8
xchrom Feb 2012 #10
LynneSin Feb 2012 #13
titaniumsalute Feb 2012 #14
sarcasmo Feb 2012 #17
mysuzuki2 Feb 2012 #11

Response to G_j (Original post)

Fri Feb 10, 2012, 01:27 PM

1. The Onion, ....right ?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to russspeakeasy (Reply #1)

Fri Feb 10, 2012, 01:29 PM

2. Nope

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Angry Dragon (Reply #2)

Fri Feb 10, 2012, 01:35 PM

4. good god..., holy shit, and I'll be damned. Incredible.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to russspeakeasy (Reply #1)

Fri Feb 10, 2012, 01:38 PM

5. No - Monty Python

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dipsydoodle (Reply #5)

Fri Feb 10, 2012, 02:46 PM

15. That's what I thought when I saw this thread!!


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to madinmaryland (Reply #15)

Fri Feb 10, 2012, 03:00 PM

16. It wouldn't be easy

to find use of that term which preceeded Monty Python so we might as well call it there's by right.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to G_j (Original post)

Fri Feb 10, 2012, 01:32 PM

3. Let me get this right. My daily act that keeps my prostate healthy and mind sane makes me

a killer?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sarcasmo (Reply #3)

Fri Feb 10, 2012, 01:42 PM

7. there must be something in the water in oklahoma

anyone who'd vote for the likes of inhofe (a guy who I think is nuttier than a fruit cake) and thinking the muslins are attempting to push sharia law on us-by god, gotta have an anti-sharia law. And didn't they refuse the mortgage settlement money to help their fellow homeless oklahomans? Now, I'd see doing it, if they were going after the banks for criminal prosecution; but being as how they love them some corporations and banksters, I don't think that's the case.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sarcasmo (Reply #3)

Fri Feb 10, 2012, 01:51 PM

9. these amendments were attached in protest nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sarcasmo (Reply #3)

Fri Feb 10, 2012, 02:20 PM

12. Only if you think that monthly act that drives me bonkers, makes me grumpy,

causes me to lose my temper for no apparent reason and make those around me miserable contains a personhood in all that mess.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to G_j (Original post)

Fri Feb 10, 2012, 01:39 PM

6. That could backfire: Some nutjobs may support it. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to G_j (Original post)

Fri Feb 10, 2012, 01:48 PM

8. I wish about 250 men would surround her house

and have the world's largest circle jerk. I can't even comprehend this insanity. So if I blow a load into my wife's back versus her vagina i could be violating the law in Oklahoma?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to titaniumsalute (Reply #8)

Fri Feb 10, 2012, 02:05 PM

10. It's a pro-choice ammendment attachment.

Taking the 'personhood' bill to it's extreme.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to titaniumsalute (Reply #8)

Fri Feb 10, 2012, 02:21 PM

13. It's meant to help defeat the anti-choice bill

Since men have no problem controling women's reproductive organs then why shouldn't we have the right to control men's reproductive organs

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LynneSin (Reply #13)

Fri Feb 10, 2012, 02:39 PM

14. Yup

I read the other articles about this and realized that SHE was the one making sense and being satirical.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to titaniumsalute (Reply #8)

Fri Feb 10, 2012, 08:03 PM

17. +1

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to G_j (Original post)

Fri Feb 10, 2012, 02:15 PM

11. I think this bill does not go far enough!

My body makes sperm and stores them for future use. If they are not used, they die and are reabsorbed. So by this same logic every woman who refuses to have sex with me (BTW this group comprises BY FAR the majority of women I know, damn it!) is in effect MURDERING those millions of unborn sperm cells that die a lonely death in my seminal vesicles or wherever. Therefore, declining to have sex with me constitutes genocide! All of the above is sheer nonsense of course. It's not that much more ridiculous than the proposal put forth by these state senators however.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread