Julian Assange Warns Us Of The Google Technocracy: The Banality of Dont Be Evil
Google, which started out as an expression of independent Californian graduate student culture a decent, humane and playful culture has, as it encountered the big, bad world, thrown its lot in with traditional Washington power elements, from the State Department to the National Security Agency.
Despite accounting for an infinitesimal fraction of violent deaths globally, terrorism is a favorite brand in United States policy circles. This is a fetish that must also be catered to, and so The Future of Terrorism gets a whole chapter. The future of terrorism, we learn, is cyberterrorism. A session of indulgent scaremongering follows, including a breathless disaster-movie scenario, wherein cyberterrorists take control of American air-traffic control systems and send planes crashing into buildings, shutting down power grids and launching nuclear weapons. The authors then tar activists who engage in digital sit-ins with the same brush.
I have a very different perspective. The advance of information technology epitomized by Google heralds the death of privacy for most people and shifts the world toward authoritarianism. This is the principal thesis in my book, Cypherpunks. But while Mr. Schmidt and Mr. Cohen tell us that the death of privacy will aid governments in repressive autocracies in targeting their citizens, they also say governments in open democracies will see it as a gift enabling them to better respond to citizen and customer concerns. In reality, the erosion of individual privacy in the West and the attendant centralization of power make abuses inevitable, moving the good societies closer to the bad ones.
The section on repressive autocracies describes, disapprovingly, various repressive surveillance measures: legislation to insert back doors into software to enable spying on citizens, monitoring of social networks and the collection of intelligence on entire populations. All of these are already in widespread use in the United States. In fact, some of those measures like the push to require every social-network profile to be linked to a real name were spearheaded by Google itself.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/02/opinion/sunday/the-banality-of-googles-dont-be-evil.html