Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsInternet Companies Deny Offering Government Access to Customer Data
Internet Companies Deny Offering Government Access to Customer Data
ABC News Abby Phillip, Steven Portnoy and Joanna Stern report:
<...>
We have never heard of PRISM, read an emailed statement from Apple. We do not provide any government agency with direct access to our servers, and any government agency requesting customer data must get a court order.
<...>
A Google spokesman said the company does not have a back door for the government to access user data.
Google cares deeply about the security of our users data. We disclose user data to government in accordance with the law, and we review all such requests carefully, a spokesman said in a statement. From time to time, people allege that we have created a government back door into our systems, but Google does not have a back door for the government to access private user data.
Microsoft, Facebook and Yahoo also denied participating in a broad program to collect data.
We provide customer data only when we receive a legally binding order or subpoena to do so, and never on a voluntary basis, Microsoft said. In addition we only ever comply with orders for requests about specific accounts or identifiers. If the government has a broader voluntary national security program to gather customer data we dont participate in it.
- more -
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/06/internet-companies-deny-offering-government-access-to-customer-data/
ABC News Abby Phillip, Steven Portnoy and Joanna Stern report:
<...>
We have never heard of PRISM, read an emailed statement from Apple. We do not provide any government agency with direct access to our servers, and any government agency requesting customer data must get a court order.
<...>
A Google spokesman said the company does not have a back door for the government to access user data.
Google cares deeply about the security of our users data. We disclose user data to government in accordance with the law, and we review all such requests carefully, a spokesman said in a statement. From time to time, people allege that we have created a government back door into our systems, but Google does not have a back door for the government to access private user data.
Microsoft, Facebook and Yahoo also denied participating in a broad program to collect data.
We provide customer data only when we receive a legally binding order or subpoena to do so, and never on a voluntary basis, Microsoft said. In addition we only ever comply with orders for requests about specific accounts or identifiers. If the government has a broader voluntary national security program to gather customer data we dont participate in it.
- more -
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/06/internet-companies-deny-offering-government-access-to-customer-data/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 976 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Internet Companies Deny Offering Government Access to Customer Data (Original Post)
ProSense
Jun 2013
OP
PSPS
(13,594 posts)1. Um, part of the court order compels them to deny everything.
"Um, part of the court order compels them to deny everything."
...at least we know there was a "court order."
OregonBlue
(7,754 posts)2. It's possible that the Guardian and the Washington Post have been had. Maybe the companies didn't
grant access to their servers. If they did not, those papers are gonna have a lot of egg on their faces.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)4. None of those are ISPs.. try again.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)5. I feel
"None of those are ISPs.. try again."
...disappointment in the air: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022960169
Savannahmann
(3,891 posts)6. When the NSA has data centers like this, what do you think they are for?
I mean, it's not like we need a two billion dollar facility in the middle of nowhere to play world class chess with.
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/03/ff_nsadatacenter/
This one should be up and running soon. It is but one of several that are out there. Remember the secret rooms built into AT&T for the warrantless wiretapping? Do we think those were closed down?