Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

GoneOffShore

(17,339 posts)
Sat Jun 8, 2013, 03:10 PM Jun 2013

How do you view the court decision regarding moving people on transplant lists?

From USA Today:

A federal judge Wednesday ordered that a dying 10-year-old suburban Philadelphia girl be placed temporarily on an adult transplant list for a new lung.

Sarah Murnaghan, of Newtown Square, has end-stage cystic fibrosis and just weeks to live, doctors say. But organ-transplant rules say children under age 12 must wait for lungs from young donors, which happens infrequently.

U.S. District Judge Michael Baylson issued a temporarily restraining order because of the severity of her illness, ruling she could be placed on the list until at least June 14, when a court hearing is scheduled.


I heard a discussion about this yesterday and initially I was in favor. However, after much consideration, I'm agreeing with Kathleen Sebelius and others that doctors should make make the medical decisions, not lawyers.

I think by going to law, this will start a two tier system for transplants. If you have the money for a lawyer and a case you'll move up the list.


2 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
A humane but wrong decision.
2 (100%)
A humane but right decision.
0 (0%)
Other.
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How do you view the court decision regarding moving people on transplant lists? (Original Post) GoneOffShore Jun 2013 OP
I think it sets a bad precedent. alarimer Jun 2013 #1
I'm leaning towards humane but wrong Travis_0004 Jun 2013 #2
Good point. GoneOffShore Jun 2013 #3

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
1. I think it sets a bad precedent.
Sat Jun 8, 2013, 03:12 PM
Jun 2013

It's not a bad idea to revisit the guidelines from time to time, but to make one exception opens the floodgates for others.

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
2. I'm leaning towards humane but wrong
Sat Jun 8, 2013, 04:21 PM
Jun 2013

I'll admit, I know almost nothing about medical transplants.

If she can accept an adult lung, it can be modified to fit her, and she can live a healthy life, then I have no problem with her receiving it.

I just don't want a situation to occur where she receives it, and its very likely that it won't work because its too big for her, and she ends up dying, and that lung could have gone to somebody else.

Either way, I hope that stories like this can make people think about organ donation and sign up. If we could get everybody to sign up and agree to be an organ donor, I think most people would get an organ while waiting.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How do you view the court...