Key anecdote to defend NSA data gathering is full of holes
Defending a vast program to sweep up phone and Internet data under antiterror laws, senior U.S. officials in recent days have cited the case of David Coleman Headley, a key plotter in the deadly 2008 Mumbai attacks.
James Clapper, the director of national intelligence, said a data collection program by the National Security Agency helped stop an attack on a Danish newspaper for which Headley did surveillance. And Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., the Senate intelligence chairwoman, also called Headleys capture a success.
But a closer examination of the case, drawn from extensive reporting by ProPublica, shows that the government surveillance only caught up with Headley after the U.S. had been tipped by British intelligence. And even that victory came after seven years in which U.S. intelligence failed to stop Headley as he roamed the globe on missions for Islamic terror networks and Pakistans spy agency.
Supporters of the sweeping U.S. surveillance effort say its needed to build a haystack of information in which to find a needle that will stop a terrorist. In Headleys case, however, it appears the U.S. was handed the needle first 2014 and then deployed surveillance that led to the arrest and prosecution of Headley and other plotters.
As ProPublica has previously documented, Headleys case shows an alarming litany of breakdowns in the U.S. counterterror system that allowed him to play a central role in the massacre of 166 people in Mumbai, among them six Americans.
A mysterious Pakistani-American businessman and ex-drug informant, Headley avoided arrest despite a half dozen warnings to federal agents about extremist activities from his family and associates in different locales. If those leads from human sources had been investigated more aggressively, authorities could have prevented the Mumbai attacks with little need for high-tech resources, critics say.
The failure here is the failure to connect systems, said a U.S. law enforcement official who worked on the case but is not cleared to discuss it publicly. Everybody had information in their silos, and they didnt share across the silos. Headley in my mind is not a successful interdiction of a terrorist. Its not a great example of how the system should work.
More at: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/06/12/key-anecdote-to-defend-nsa-data-gathering-is-full-of-holes/