Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

undeterred

(34,658 posts)
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 07:14 PM Jun 2013

Wisconsin bill would bar police from enforcing any new federal gun restrictions

MADISON, Wis. – Wisconsin police would be forbidden from enforcing any new federal gun and ammunition restrictions, bans or registration requirements under a bill a Republican lawmaker is circulating. Rep. Michael Schraa of Oshkosh, a first-term legislator and a member of the National Rifle Association, sent out an email Tuesday to his fellow lawmakers seeking co-sponsors for the proposal. He also issued a statement to the media saying the bill is meant to send a message that Wisconsin won't help the federal government restrict the public's constitutional right to bear arms.

"I'm not this cowboy, gun-toting legislator," Schraa said in a telephone interview. "I just think it's ultimately important to protect our constitutional rights. When I raised my right hand on Jan. 7 and took the oath of office, I took an oath that I would defend the Wisconsin Constitution and the federal constitution. That's the motivating factor."Rep. Chris Danou, D-Trempealeau, said he thought the Civil War determined that federal law pre-empts state law. "States don't get to pick and choose what federal laws apply to the states or not," Danou said. "This is settled law. (The bill is) just not rational."

The bill comes after President Obama introduced a gun control plan in the wake of the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., in December. The president's proposal included banning assault-style rifles and magazines that hold more than 10 rounds and extending background checks to almost all gun sales. The plan ultimately died in the Senate, but the president has urged supporters to pressure Congress to reconsider the issues.

Under Schraa's bill, a state or local law enforcement officer would be prohibited from enforcing any federal act, law, rule, regulation or order enacted after Jan. 1, 2013, that bans or restricts semi-automatic weapons, assault weapons or magazines; requires people to register their guns, ammunitions or other firearm accessories; regulates magazine capacities or how much ammunition a person can possess; prohibits types of ammunition; or requires people to turn their weapons into the government. Any police officer who knowingly enforces any of those federal statutes or orders would be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by up to $10,000 in fines and nine months in jail.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/06/12/wis-bill-would-bar-police-from-enforcing-gun-bans/#ixzz2WKTlcMfU

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wisconsin bill would bar police from enforcing any new federal gun restrictions (Original Post) undeterred Jun 2013 OP
These gunner extremeists won't be happy... hlthe2b Jun 2013 #1
with who? nt galileoreloaded Jun 2013 #2
I believe a civil war is exactly what a lot of them are after. (nt) Paladin Jun 2013 #3
See post #2. n/t cherokeeprogressive Jun 2013 #4
An elected official who wants to put the police in jail undeterred Jun 2013 #5
It is a subject that brings out the loonies on both sides. nt hack89 Jun 2013 #6
Hi, Mr. Schraa. Meet the Supremacy Clause. nyquil_man Jun 2013 #7
good luck with that dlwickham Jun 2013 #8
Now if we could do the same with pot laws and have states make it legal The Straight Story Jun 2013 #9

undeterred

(34,658 posts)
5. An elected official who wants to put the police in jail
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 07:29 PM
Jun 2013

for enforcing federal laws... that's absurd. And it is a very odd kind of conservative.

nyquil_man

(1,443 posts)
7. Hi, Mr. Schraa. Meet the Supremacy Clause.
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 07:32 PM
Jun 2013

It's part of that Constitution you claim to uphold.

The states don't have the right to invalidate federal laws. The federal courts do.

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
9. Now if we could do the same with pot laws and have states make it legal
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 08:37 PM
Jun 2013

Despite what the feds want and then in no way assist the feds in their enforcement....

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wisconsin bill would bar ...