Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 10:26 AM Jun 2013

Dick Cheney Tells Chris Wallace: ‘Traitor’ Snowden Possibly Had Chinese Connection Before Leaking



Dick Cheney staunchly defended the NSA surveillance programs started under his tenure as Vice President, telling Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday that the programs could have stopped 9/11 had they been in effect, and that Edward Snowden was a traitor for revealing the information and fleeing to China.

“When you had the hijackers in 9/11, they were in contact with their leadership overseas and the rest of the organization in the States,” Cheney said. “If we had been able to read their mail and intercept communications, and pick up from the calls overseas the numbers here that they were using in the United States, we would then have been able to thwart the attack.”

In contrast to critics like Rand Paul, Cheney believes the government was justified in expanding the scope of surveillance to all phone metadata, even of people not suspected of crimes, claiming that wartime footing allows additional national security measures.

“Congress authorized the president to use military force to deal with the crisis,” Cheney said, referring to the War on Terror. “That puts you in the category of using your military assets, intelligence assets and so forth in order to protect the country against another attack. When you consider somebody smuggling a nuclear device into the United States it becomes very important to gather intelligence on your enemies and stop the attack before it is launched.

<snip>

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/dick-cheney-tells-chris-wallace-traitor-snowden-possibly-had-chinese-connection-before-leaking-info/
63 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dick Cheney Tells Chris Wallace: ‘Traitor’ Snowden Possibly Had Chinese Connection Before Leaking (Original Post) cali Jun 2013 OP
Traitors also out CIA agents, Dick... Cooley Hurd Jun 2013 #1
+1000000 nashville_brook Jun 2013 #17
In meme form... alp227 Jun 2013 #51
Ctheney just wants to keep us safe Fumesucker Jun 2013 #2
Dick Cheney Laughs Off Privacy Concerns Over Government Surveillance ProSense Jun 2013 #3
lol. and just think, he and you agree on so much. perfect really. cali Jun 2013 #25
+1 adric mutelovic Jun 2013 #37
Cheney: Obama has ‘no credibility’ — but the NSA is ‘to be believed’ ProSense Jun 2013 #48
Who's side to take Patriot Whistle Blower or War Criminal Traitor usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #4
Yes, I was thinking the same thing, didn't take me a minute to get the answer. sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #10
Yep, and our whole political and media establishments are now complicit in their crimes usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #20
Why didn't he prosecute them? MNBrewer Jun 2013 #29
On the contrary, the people were screaming for those particular prosecutions, all over the world sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #43
That's what I used to think too, but I've been assured by a DU'er that nobody wanted to see MNBrewer Jun 2013 #45
Except in this case Snowden as a contract employee of NSA his protection as a whistleblower is Thinkingabout Jun 2013 #12
That doesn't change a thing I wrote. Patriot vs War Criminal usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #14
Since you do not want the statutes then I will state he is a criminal and it has nothing to do with Thinkingabout Jun 2013 #24
And I will state the fact that we have the notion of a WHISTLE BLOWER for a reason usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #26
If you think he is going to have the protection of a Whistleblower, nope, won't happen, his position Thinkingabout Jun 2013 #28
No totalitarian in their right mind would grant him any kind of protection, hello... usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #31
Never happen, watch the actions of the FBI to get your answer. Thinkingabout Jun 2013 #34
derp usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #35
Is your IQ a one also Thinkingabout Jun 2013 #38
derpity usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #39
yep, I am right again Thinkingabout Jun 2013 #40
Sure, and you're in good company, too! usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #41
You are wrong again, got anything right lately Thinkingabout Jun 2013 #42
Hold on Mr. Judge-Jury-Executioner.... He's an *Alleged* criminal MNBrewer Jun 2013 #30
Which statute do you have more faith in? Bush's Patriot Act (I see you referred to it for sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #44
As a US citizen I am bound by all, i do not get to pick and choose, I may not agree with Thinkingabout Jun 2013 #49
So if something is the law you will accept it? How about it being against the law for women to vote sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #58
Until those rights was changed the women and blacks did not vote, they was not able to Thinkingabout Jun 2013 #59
Well the cause is the defense and protection of the Constitution. Did you know that the oath sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #60
Perhaps this is your cause but it is not my cause. Snowden is probably not about the cause, he is Thinkingabout Jun 2013 #61
Okay! You don't care about the Constitution. There's not much more to say sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #63
False Argument, but nice Strawman maxrandb Jun 2013 #50
War Criminal and Traitor to the American People, Dick Cheney has no standing on this subject usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #54
Oh I agree with you maxrandb Jun 2013 #55
You agree with the totalitarian Dick Cheney, on this spying issue, and that is where we part ways usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #57
But, Mr. Cheney, we were NOT under a declared state of war... WCGreen Jun 2013 #5
Authoritarians in both Parties will use the AUMF to justify anything MNBrewer Jun 2013 #32
Geez. "If we'd been able to...". You WERE able to, Dick! JHB Jun 2013 #6
Of course he does. It was in 2001 that the equipment for all this was installed Catherina Jun 2013 #7
NSA SamKnause Jun 2013 #8
Ah, it came from Dick Cheney, so it must be true! backscatter712 Jun 2013 #9
I see the Father of Lies has spoken on Father's Day. Only at FoxNews. Zen Democrat Jun 2013 #11
The shame of it is that The Dick isn't doing his talking from a jail cell. n/t magellan Jun 2013 #13
I'm with Cheney! Daniel537 Jun 2013 #15
Might need a sarcasm tag... Cooley Hurd Jun 2013 #18
This is going to put the NSA apologists here in an awkward position! :) reformist2 Jun 2013 #21
Better put the snark tag on that comment. Unless you meant it of course. sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #22
Yeah! Where do these peons get off thinking they know the law better than we?! usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #27
Hey shootemintheface. Fuck you. You couldn't give a rat's ass what happens to Americans, as long lonestarnot Jun 2013 #16
Remember Cheney wiretapped people without warrants malaise Jun 2013 #19
An evil prick that deserves a jail cell Vinnie From Indy Jun 2013 #23
Thank god Dick Cheney is on the case! DirkGently Jun 2013 #33
If the whole issue comes down to who the worst MESSENGER is ... DirkGently Jun 2013 #36
The facade of Red versus Blue is falling apart and revealing he REAL battle, woo me with science Jun 2013 #46
interestingly enough, yesterday i googled cheney and the current and last director of nsa xiamiam Jun 2013 #47
It doesn't matter. It doesnt change the fact that our government is spying on all of us. bowens43 Jun 2013 #52
war criminal heather blossom Jun 2013 #53
Wow. I don't envy the apologists right now. Marr Jun 2013 #56
And apparently about half of DU agrees with Cheney. JackRiddler Jun 2013 #62
 

Cooley Hurd

(26,877 posts)
1. Traitors also out CIA agents, Dick...
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 10:29 AM
Jun 2013

The irony dripping from his lips is always staggering, isn't it???

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
3. Dick Cheney Laughs Off Privacy Concerns Over Government Surveillance
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 10:32 AM
Jun 2013
Dick Cheney Laughs Off Privacy Concerns Over Government Surveillance

By Josh Israel

Former Vice President Dick Cheney (R), whose false statements helped propel the United States into an eight year war in Iraq, said Sunday that citizens should simply “trust” the federal government on matters of privacy and security.

In an interview on Fox News Sunday, Cheney laughed off questions about why federal surveillance of phone records need be kept secret, suggesting that since the people who authorize the program are elected by voters, voters should simply trust their judgment.

<...>

While Americans do elect the President and Vice President, only a small fraction of voters select who will be in Congressional leadership. Cheney’s suggestion that voters should trust them because they elected them sets up a substantial catch-22 — if voters can’t know what their elected officials are doing on matters of privacy and national security, they cannot know whether they are earning their trust.

And the Bush-Cheney administration is a perfect example of why voters should not always trust their elected leaders. According to the Center for Public Integrity, the administration made at least 935 demonstrably false statements in the lead up to the 2003 Iraq War. Cheney himself made 48 of those, including his infamous 2002 claim that: “Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction. There is no doubt he is amassing them to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us.”

- more -

http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/06/16/2164401/dick-cheney-trust-surveillance/

Dick Cheney, still evil.

Another misleading media report implies that warrantless wiretapping is legal
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023026724

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
48. Cheney: Obama has ‘no credibility’ — but the NSA is ‘to be believed’
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 03:15 PM
Jun 2013

Cheney: Obama has ‘no credibility’ — but the NSA is ‘to be believed’
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/06/16/cheney-obama-has-no-credibility-but-the-nsa-is-to-be-believed/

"Sarin my ass. they're LYING to us again...And no, sorry, I don't automatically believe President Obama. I want fucking indisputable PROOF of claims that supposedly justify military intervention."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023021177

"he and you agree on so much. perfect really."



 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
4. Who's side to take Patriot Whistle Blower or War Criminal Traitor
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 10:32 AM
Jun 2013

I'll go with the patriot whistle blower

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
10. Yes, I was thinking the same thing, didn't take me a minute to get the answer.
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 10:45 AM
Jun 2013

WMDs, Dick! Valerie Plame, Torture. Now, again without producing a shred of evidence (he probably has Curveball, the drunken liar, on speed dial so they can produce some more of that 'evidence' they get from their paid 'assets') he makes yet another accusation.

When is this criminal going to be prosecuted?

And when is the President going to get nervous about the sting of war criminals and liars that are lining up behind him?

Wouldn't you wonder if you were on the right side, when Ari Fleischer, Dick Cheney, Peter King et al turned out to be on YOUR side?

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
20. Yep, and our whole political and media establishments are now complicit in their crimes
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 11:20 AM
Jun 2013

by the fact that they have covered them up, and/or chosen not to investigate and prosecute them.

We all now live in a grand "potemkin village" as we go about our daily lives, and listen to the news go on and on with their BS like nothing is wrong with the system, everything the gov is gospel, and the only amendment we are allowed to have and "fight" for is the 2nd.

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
29. Why didn't he prosecute them?
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 12:04 PM
Jun 2013

Oh yeah, "look forward" and "the people had no stomach for political prosecutions".... so I've been told by DU.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
43. On the contrary, the people were screaming for those particular prosecutions, all over the world
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 01:52 PM
Jun 2013

except for the far right in this country and a few our dictator friends overseas.

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
45. That's what I used to think too, but I've been assured by a DU'er that nobody wanted to see
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 01:57 PM
Jun 2013

a "political prosecution" of the War Criminals, the public had "no stomach for it"

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
12. Except in this case Snowden as a contract employee of NSA his protection as a whistleblower is
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 10:46 AM
Jun 2013

exempt. The information on the Patriot Act is listed on Wikipedia so how has he blown the whistle? He did violate his Code of Ethics which makes him a criminal. I am not defending Cheney, he has his own problems.

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
14. That doesn't change a thing I wrote. Patriot vs War Criminal
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 10:54 AM
Jun 2013

Now before you start quoting the statutes back to me, let me state that I do not believe you have committed a crime when you reveal a crime by our government no matter what laws the totalitarians write.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
24. Since you do not want the statutes then I will state he is a criminal and it has nothing to do with
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 11:51 AM
Jun 2013

whether you perceive it is a crime.

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
26. And I will state the fact that we have the notion of a WHISTLE BLOWER for a reason
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 11:58 AM
Jun 2013

so that corrupt laws, and wrong doing will not go on in perpetuity, even though totalitarians pass laws that "legalize" their crimes.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
28. If you think he is going to have the protection of a Whistleblower, nope, won't happen, his position
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 12:03 PM
Jun 2013

is excluded, no whistleblower title for him, criminal will do.

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
31. No totalitarian in their right mind would grant him any kind of protection, hello...
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 12:06 PM
Jun 2013

But the people will, bet!

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
44. Which statute do you have more faith in? Bush's Patriot Act (I see you referred to it for
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 01:54 PM
Jun 2013

backup) or The US Constitution?

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
49. As a US citizen I am bound by all, i do not get to pick and choose, I may not agree with
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 04:02 PM
Jun 2013

All laws in whatever form they may be covered but by our process it is what we have. We have freedom of speech but we can't yell fire in a crowded theater if it is not true.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
58. So if something is the law you will accept it? How about it being against the law for women to vote
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 05:28 PM
Jun 2013

or African Americans to be segregated from White Americans?

Here's the way I see it. If a law is bad, I do not use it to defend those who ARE using to do bad things. I would never, eg, have used a law that forbade women to vote by referring to it as 'the law which we must abide by'. I would refer to it as 'the law that must be changed'.

The Patriot Act has a sunshine clause, the only way Bush was able to get it passed. It was supposed to be temporary and he even knew it was so bad that he had pretend it was temporary.

Those who believed him were stupid, imo. Or maybe it was just an out for them knowing their constituents would be furious with them for voting for it.

It is a horrible law to which I never refer anyone, especially when we have GOOD laws, the Constitution itself, to refer to.

So when I see someone saying 'it's the law' without adding, 'that damn well needs to go', I'm not sure where they stand.

They can pass all the bad laws they want, they are still bad and still need to go. That's the only reason I would ever mention that Orwellian, Bush piece of garbage 'law'.

We are also not obliged morally to obey bad laws. History teaches us that without those who refused to obey bad laws, this would be a very bad place to be living in for an awful lot of people.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
59. Until those rights was changed the women and blacks did not vote, they was not able to
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 06:23 PM
Jun 2013

Vote retroactively, just as Snowden can nit be judge and jury on violating his Code of Ethics but in the case of Snowden he accepted the position, there was not a law saying he had to take the job. Somewhere apparently he thought he could take action and not have to answer for his actions. Too many are getting twisted out of shape about "causes". There is nothing which forces anyone to use the services being monitored, don't like being monitored then cease all services which do so and then you can have freedom for intrusions. This is not a hard decision.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
60. Well the cause is the defense and protection of the Constitution. Did you know that the oath
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 06:32 PM
Jun 2013

taken by every elected official and military personnel has one requirement of them 'defend and protect the Constitution'. That is ALL that is required in their oaths of office.

Women and African Americans may not have been ALLOWED to vote but they sure did not accept those laws. They WORKED, the violated OTHER laws, they PROTESTED, DEMONSTRATED and got themselves arrested, some even killed by law enforcement, but they did not just say 'well, it's the law'.

And Snowden is doing what they did, he is risking his own freedom and life, as they did (and now we call them heroes, back then they were called traitors) to protect the US Constitution.

That is what he said, and another hero, once a whistle blower himself, Ellsberg, calls him 'the man we have been waiting for for 40 years'.

So what would do to defend the Constitution if you are not going to break any laws to try to save it, what would have done about women voting, if you were not willing to break any laws to get that vote?

'We were only following orders' has not been an acceptable excuse for wrong doing since WW11 when those who WERE following the laws of their countries, were prosecuted for NOT violating those laws and this country was responsible for many of those prosecutions.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
61. Perhaps this is your cause but it is not my cause. Snowden is probably not about the cause, he is
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 07:22 PM
Jun 2013

About himself. Go with your cause

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
63. Okay! You don't care about the Constitution. There's not much more to say
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 10:33 PM
Jun 2013

to someone who doesn't care about the Constitution. It's only the very foundations of this Democracy, but hey, if you'd rather go with gossip and talking points by those who are struggling hard to try to change the conversation but failing miserably, you go right ahead with that useless game.

But they have violated the Constitutional rights of the American people, so get ready to see a lot of people be extremely upset over it.

As the polls are showing, the American people by a large majority care about this country and what has been revealed, no matter by whom, is very disturbing to them as they have demonstrated.

maxrandb

(15,324 posts)
50. False Argument, but nice Strawman
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 04:10 PM
Jun 2013

Gee, Dick Cheney might actually think that Stalin was wrong for killing millions of his own people, and I'd agree with him...Guess that means I agree with everything Dick Cheney ever says.

I think it's more appropriate to say "a traitor is a traitor", and if anyone would know treason...it's Dick "effing" Cheney.

maxrandb

(15,324 posts)
55. Oh I agree with you
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 05:04 PM
Jun 2013

Dick Cheney has NO credibility on anything...BUT, folks are trying to say that "since Dick Cheney thinks this guy committed treason by turning over National Security data to the Chinese", then anyone that agrees that TUNRING OVER SECRET DATA TO THE CHINESE, OR ANY FOREIGN COUNTRY without authorization, must support Dick Cheney in everything. See, the enemy of my enemy is my friend, or so some on DU seem to think.

I expect that from the mouth-breathing T-Baggers, but, I guess I expected more from DU.

Oh well, I guess since Dick Morris once worked for the Clinton's, I should just get in line with anything he says now.

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
57. You agree with the totalitarian Dick Cheney, on this spying issue, and that is where we part ways
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 05:12 PM
Jun 2013

Revealing to the world that the US is spying on EVERYONE, terrorist or not, is a public service, especially to us Americans.

Of course, you are free to disagree, but I am not a partisan on this issue, I was against it when cheney and bush were doing it, and I am still against it now even with a dem in office.

Hypocrisy, the tribute vice pays to virtue.

WCGreen

(45,558 posts)
5. But, Mr. Cheney, we were NOT under a declared state of war...
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 10:34 AM
Jun 2013

Nothing destroys a free society quicker when people are willing to cede rights for safety. And in this situation, the spetacular trumps the reality and it is people like Cheney who will jump to take advantage of circumstance to erode civil liberty.

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
32. Authoritarians in both Parties will use the AUMF to justify anything
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 12:08 PM
Jun 2013

regardless of what it is. Torture? No problem! Domestic surveillance? Done! Indefinite detention? You took the words right out of my mouth!

JHB

(37,160 posts)
6. Geez. "If we'd been able to...". You WERE able to, Dick!
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 10:35 AM
Jun 2013

Everything needed to find those guys was already available to you. You guys just dismissed and deprioritized it.

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
7. Of course he does. It was in 2001 that the equipment for all this was installed
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 10:39 AM
Jun 2013
“The decision must have been made in September 2001,” Mr. Binney told me and the cinematographer Kirsten Johnson. “That’s when the equipment started coming in.” In this Op-Doc, Mr. Binney explains how the program he created for foreign intelligence gathering was turned inward on this country. He resigned over this in 2001 and began speaking out publicly in the last year. He is among a group of N.S.A. whistle-blowers, including Thomas A. Drake, who have each risked everything — their freedom, livelihoods and personal relationships — to warn Americans about the dangers of N.S.A. domestic spying.

...

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/23/opinion/the-national-security-agencys-domestic-spying-program.html?_r=0


Bill Binney resigned from his 40 year career as a Director at NSA when the programs he wrote for foreign surveillance were used against fellow Americans. And they tried to destroy him for blowing the whistle as surely as they're trying to destroy Edward Snowden right now for the same thing.

director of the NSA’s World Geopolitical and Military Analysis Reporting Group and was a senior NSA crypto-mathematician largely responsible for automating the agency’s worldwide eavesdropping network.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023024549


Why is that war criminal roaming free?

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
9. Ah, it came from Dick Cheney, so it must be true!
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 10:41 AM
Jun 2013

Why, Cheney and his toadies would never lie or conceal the truth about national security issues (*COUGH* Valerie Plame!)

 

Daniel537

(1,560 posts)
15. I'm with Cheney!
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 10:56 AM
Jun 2013

Snowden broke the law. Whatever the govt. tells you to keep secret, you keep secret damn it! So their spying on all of us? Big whoop. Deal with it. Its for National Security. That's all you need to know. Damn limp-wrist civil libertarians.

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
27. Yeah! Where do these peons get off thinking they know the law better than we?!
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 12:01 PM
Jun 2013

Don't they know that we write the laws!?

They got some nerve, especially being a high school dropout and all, sheesh!

/sarcasm

 

lonestarnot

(77,097 posts)
16. Hey shootemintheface. Fuck you. You couldn't give a rat's ass what happens to Americans, as long
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 11:04 AM
Jun 2013

as it doesn't happen to your old mechanical insulated ass. So just shut the fuck up and fuck you. "Determined to strike." Yeah could have you fuckwad.

malaise

(268,976 posts)
19. Remember Cheney wiretapped people without warrants
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 11:18 AM
Jun 2013

and he outed a CIA agent.

Just croak Cheney and do the planet a favor.

Vinnie From Indy

(10,820 posts)
23. An evil prick that deserves a jail cell
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 11:37 AM
Jun 2013

I would not be surprised at all if Cheney still had complete access to NSA superpowers.

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
33. Thank god Dick Cheney is on the case!
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 12:10 PM
Jun 2013

He'll give us the straight dope on national security and who our real enemies are.

Because, that's totally his thing.














Er.

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
36. If the whole issue comes down to who the worst MESSENGER is ...
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 12:48 PM
Jun 2013

... I think anyone opposed to widespread domestic surveillance just won.

"Snowden isn't a friendly neighbor" doesn't seem so damning (wait, when did it seem damning?) compared to Señor Waterboarding's resume, eh?

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
46. The facade of Red versus Blue is falling apart and revealing he REAL battle,
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 02:01 PM
Jun 2013

which is corporate fascists against the rest of us. And the corporate fascists live in both parties.

When the people finally wake up to what is being done to them and start to demand answers and accountability regardless of party, *of course* the long denied collusion between corporatists in both parties is finally exposed.

These corporatists have been walking hand in hand all along, on virtually every major issue important to the One Percent. We are only seeing their collusion and clinging together more clearly on *this* issue, because the outage across the country is finally bipartisan, and they can no longer hide behind their carefully propagandized Red and Blue Teams to pretend they are on opposite sides.

xiamiam

(4,906 posts)
47. interestingly enough, yesterday i googled cheney and the current and last director of nsa
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 02:09 PM
Jun 2013

I could not find one image with cheney and either of them. I found a couple images with bush and cheney and alexander taken at the same time. If its evil and awful, Cheney usually has his hand in it are my thoughts. The only good thing about seeing current images of Cheney is that he looks healthy enough to stand trial and be sent to jail. Stranger things have happened and I have yet to give up hope for justice to eventually be served. I think its interesting that I couldn't find any photos with the nsa directors spanning his time in office. Hayden, director of the NSA during 911 said he heard about the world trade center from cnn.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
56. Wow. I don't envy the apologists right now.
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 05:06 PM
Jun 2013

Imagine being on the same side of an argument as Dick Cheney, mocking "the Left" as villains, and *still* having to convince yourself that you're the base of the Democratic Party.

 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
62. And apparently about half of DU agrees with Cheney.
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 07:27 PM
Jun 2013

Except they didn't like the program Snowden revealed when it was under Cheney. Curious.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dick Cheney Tells Chris W...