General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDick Cheney Tells Chris Wallace: ‘Traitor’ Snowden Possibly Had Chinese Connection Before Leaking
Dick Cheney staunchly defended the NSA surveillance programs started under his tenure as Vice President, telling Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday that the programs could have stopped 9/11 had they been in effect, and that Edward Snowden was a traitor for revealing the information and fleeing to China.
When you had the hijackers in 9/11, they were in contact with their leadership overseas and the rest of the organization in the States, Cheney said. If we had been able to read their mail and intercept communications, and pick up from the calls overseas the numbers here that they were using in the United States, we would then have been able to thwart the attack.
In contrast to critics like Rand Paul, Cheney believes the government was justified in expanding the scope of surveillance to all phone metadata, even of people not suspected of crimes, claiming that wartime footing allows additional national security measures.
Congress authorized the president to use military force to deal with the crisis, Cheney said, referring to the War on Terror. That puts you in the category of using your military assets, intelligence assets and so forth in order to protect the country against another attack. When you consider somebody smuggling a nuclear device into the United States it becomes very important to gather intelligence on your enemies and stop the attack before it is launched.
<snip>
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/dick-cheney-tells-chris-wallace-traitor-snowden-possibly-had-chinese-connection-before-leaking-info/
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)The irony dripping from his lips is always staggering, isn't it???
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)alp227
(32,020 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)No one is more misunderstood, bless his liquid helium pump.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)By Josh Israel
Former Vice President Dick Cheney (R), whose false statements helped propel the United States into an eight year war in Iraq, said Sunday that citizens should simply trust the federal government on matters of privacy and security.
In an interview on Fox News Sunday, Cheney laughed off questions about why federal surveillance of phone records need be kept secret, suggesting that since the people who authorize the program are elected by voters, voters should simply trust their judgment.
<...>
While Americans do elect the President and Vice President, only a small fraction of voters select who will be in Congressional leadership. Cheneys suggestion that voters should trust them because they elected them sets up a substantial catch-22 if voters cant know what their elected officials are doing on matters of privacy and national security, they cannot know whether they are earning their trust.
And the Bush-Cheney administration is a perfect example of why voters should not always trust their elected leaders. According to the Center for Public Integrity, the administration made at least 935 demonstrably false statements in the lead up to the 2003 Iraq War. Cheney himself made 48 of those, including his infamous 2002 claim that: Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction. There is no doubt he is amassing them to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us.
- more -
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/06/16/2164401/dick-cheney-trust-surveillance/
Dick Cheney, still evil.
Another misleading media report implies that warrantless wiretapping is legal
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023026724
cali
(114,904 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)Cheney: Obama has no credibility but the NSA is to be believed
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/06/16/cheney-obama-has-no-credibility-but-the-nsa-is-to-be-believed/
"Sarin my ass. they're LYING to us again...And no, sorry, I don't automatically believe President Obama. I want fucking indisputable PROOF of claims that supposedly justify military intervention."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023021177
"he and you agree on so much. perfect really."
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)I'll go with the patriot whistle blower
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)WMDs, Dick! Valerie Plame, Torture. Now, again without producing a shred of evidence (he probably has Curveball, the drunken liar, on speed dial so they can produce some more of that 'evidence' they get from their paid 'assets') he makes yet another accusation.
When is this criminal going to be prosecuted?
And when is the President going to get nervous about the sting of war criminals and liars that are lining up behind him?
Wouldn't you wonder if you were on the right side, when Ari Fleischer, Dick Cheney, Peter King et al turned out to be on YOUR side?
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)by the fact that they have covered them up, and/or chosen not to investigate and prosecute them.
We all now live in a grand "potemkin village" as we go about our daily lives, and listen to the news go on and on with their BS like nothing is wrong with the system, everything the gov is gospel, and the only amendment we are allowed to have and "fight" for is the 2nd.
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)Oh yeah, "look forward" and "the people had no stomach for political prosecutions".... so I've been told by DU.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)except for the far right in this country and a few our dictator friends overseas.
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)a "political prosecution" of the War Criminals, the public had "no stomach for it"
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)exempt. The information on the Patriot Act is listed on Wikipedia so how has he blown the whistle? He did violate his Code of Ethics which makes him a criminal. I am not defending Cheney, he has his own problems.
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)Now before you start quoting the statutes back to me, let me state that I do not believe you have committed a crime when you reveal a crime by our government no matter what laws the totalitarians write.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)whether you perceive it is a crime.
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)so that corrupt laws, and wrong doing will not go on in perpetuity, even though totalitarians pass laws that "legalize" their crimes.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)is excluded, no whistleblower title for him, criminal will do.
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)But the people will, bet!
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)derp
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)backup) or The US Constitution?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)All laws in whatever form they may be covered but by our process it is what we have. We have freedom of speech but we can't yell fire in a crowded theater if it is not true.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)or African Americans to be segregated from White Americans?
Here's the way I see it. If a law is bad, I do not use it to defend those who ARE using to do bad things. I would never, eg, have used a law that forbade women to vote by referring to it as 'the law which we must abide by'. I would refer to it as 'the law that must be changed'.
The Patriot Act has a sunshine clause, the only way Bush was able to get it passed. It was supposed to be temporary and he even knew it was so bad that he had pretend it was temporary.
Those who believed him were stupid, imo. Or maybe it was just an out for them knowing their constituents would be furious with them for voting for it.
It is a horrible law to which I never refer anyone, especially when we have GOOD laws, the Constitution itself, to refer to.
So when I see someone saying 'it's the law' without adding, 'that damn well needs to go', I'm not sure where they stand.
They can pass all the bad laws they want, they are still bad and still need to go. That's the only reason I would ever mention that Orwellian, Bush piece of garbage 'law'.
We are also not obliged morally to obey bad laws. History teaches us that without those who refused to obey bad laws, this would be a very bad place to be living in for an awful lot of people.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Vote retroactively, just as Snowden can nit be judge and jury on violating his Code of Ethics but in the case of Snowden he accepted the position, there was not a law saying he had to take the job. Somewhere apparently he thought he could take action and not have to answer for his actions. Too many are getting twisted out of shape about "causes". There is nothing which forces anyone to use the services being monitored, don't like being monitored then cease all services which do so and then you can have freedom for intrusions. This is not a hard decision.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)taken by every elected official and military personnel has one requirement of them 'defend and protect the Constitution'. That is ALL that is required in their oaths of office.
Women and African Americans may not have been ALLOWED to vote but they sure did not accept those laws. They WORKED, the violated OTHER laws, they PROTESTED, DEMONSTRATED and got themselves arrested, some even killed by law enforcement, but they did not just say 'well, it's the law'.
And Snowden is doing what they did, he is risking his own freedom and life, as they did (and now we call them heroes, back then they were called traitors) to protect the US Constitution.
That is what he said, and another hero, once a whistle blower himself, Ellsberg, calls him 'the man we have been waiting for for 40 years'.
So what would do to defend the Constitution if you are not going to break any laws to try to save it, what would have done about women voting, if you were not willing to break any laws to get that vote?
'We were only following orders' has not been an acceptable excuse for wrong doing since WW11 when those who WERE following the laws of their countries, were prosecuted for NOT violating those laws and this country was responsible for many of those prosecutions.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)About himself. Go with your cause
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)to someone who doesn't care about the Constitution. It's only the very foundations of this Democracy, but hey, if you'd rather go with gossip and talking points by those who are struggling hard to try to change the conversation but failing miserably, you go right ahead with that useless game.
But they have violated the Constitutional rights of the American people, so get ready to see a lot of people be extremely upset over it.
As the polls are showing, the American people by a large majority care about this country and what has been revealed, no matter by whom, is very disturbing to them as they have demonstrated.
maxrandb
(15,324 posts)Gee, Dick Cheney might actually think that Stalin was wrong for killing millions of his own people, and I'd agree with him...Guess that means I agree with everything Dick Cheney ever says.
I think it's more appropriate to say "a traitor is a traitor", and if anyone would know treason...it's Dick "effing" Cheney.
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)sorry
maxrandb
(15,324 posts)Dick Cheney has NO credibility on anything...BUT, folks are trying to say that "since Dick Cheney thinks this guy committed treason by turning over National Security data to the Chinese", then anyone that agrees that TUNRING OVER SECRET DATA TO THE CHINESE, OR ANY FOREIGN COUNTRY without authorization, must support Dick Cheney in everything. See, the enemy of my enemy is my friend, or so some on DU seem to think.
I expect that from the mouth-breathing T-Baggers, but, I guess I expected more from DU.
Oh well, I guess since Dick Morris once worked for the Clinton's, I should just get in line with anything he says now.
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)Revealing to the world that the US is spying on EVERYONE, terrorist or not, is a public service, especially to us Americans.
Of course, you are free to disagree, but I am not a partisan on this issue, I was against it when cheney and bush were doing it, and I am still against it now even with a dem in office.
Hypocrisy, the tribute vice pays to virtue.
WCGreen
(45,558 posts)Nothing destroys a free society quicker when people are willing to cede rights for safety. And in this situation, the spetacular trumps the reality and it is people like Cheney who will jump to take advantage of circumstance to erode civil liberty.
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)regardless of what it is. Torture? No problem! Domestic surveillance? Done! Indefinite detention? You took the words right out of my mouth!
JHB
(37,160 posts)Everything needed to find those guys was already available to you. You guys just dismissed and deprioritized it.
Catherina
(35,568 posts)...
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/23/opinion/the-national-security-agencys-domestic-spying-program.html?_r=0
Bill Binney resigned from his 40 year career as a Director at NSA when the programs he wrote for foreign surveillance were used against fellow Americans. And they tried to destroy him for blowing the whistle as surely as they're trying to destroy Edward Snowden right now for the same thing.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023024549
Why is that war criminal roaming free?
TRAITOR Cheney.
Enough said.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Why, Cheney and his toadies would never lie or conceal the truth about national security issues (*COUGH* Valerie Plame!)
Zen Democrat
(5,901 posts)magellan
(13,257 posts)Daniel537
(1,560 posts)Snowden broke the law. Whatever the govt. tells you to keep secret, you keep secret damn it! So their spying on all of us? Big whoop. Deal with it. Its for National Security. That's all you need to know. Damn limp-wrist civil libertarians.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)...unless you're serious.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)Don't they know that we write the laws!?
They got some nerve, especially being a high school dropout and all, sheesh!
/sarcasm
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)as it doesn't happen to your old mechanical insulated ass. So just shut the fuck up and fuck you. "Determined to strike." Yeah could have you fuckwad.
malaise
(268,976 posts)and he outed a CIA agent.
Just croak Cheney and do the planet a favor.
Vinnie From Indy
(10,820 posts)I would not be surprised at all if Cheney still had complete access to NSA superpowers.
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)He'll give us the straight dope on national security and who our real enemies are.
Because, that's totally his thing.
Er.
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)... I think anyone opposed to widespread domestic surveillance just won.
"Snowden isn't a friendly neighbor" doesn't seem so damning (wait, when did it seem damning?) compared to Señor Waterboarding's resume, eh?
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)which is corporate fascists against the rest of us. And the corporate fascists live in both parties.
When the people finally wake up to what is being done to them and start to demand answers and accountability regardless of party, *of course* the long denied collusion between corporatists in both parties is finally exposed.
These corporatists have been walking hand in hand all along, on virtually every major issue important to the One Percent. We are only seeing their collusion and clinging together more clearly on *this* issue, because the outage across the country is finally bipartisan, and they can no longer hide behind their carefully propagandized Red and Blue Teams to pretend they are on opposite sides.
xiamiam
(4,906 posts)I could not find one image with cheney and either of them. I found a couple images with bush and cheney and alexander taken at the same time. If its evil and awful, Cheney usually has his hand in it are my thoughts. The only good thing about seeing current images of Cheney is that he looks healthy enough to stand trial and be sent to jail. Stranger things have happened and I have yet to give up hope for justice to eventually be served. I think its interesting that I couldn't find any photos with the nsa directors spanning his time in office. Hayden, director of the NSA during 911 said he heard about the world trade center from cnn.
bowens43
(16,064 posts)heather blossom
(174 posts)Why isn't this war criminal in jail?
Marr
(20,317 posts)Imagine being on the same side of an argument as Dick Cheney, mocking "the Left" as villains, and *still* having to convince yourself that you're the base of the Democratic Party.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Except they didn't like the program Snowden revealed when it was under Cheney. Curious.