Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf you think the Udall / Wyden Proposal is a good idea
thank Snowden.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 786 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If you think the Udall / Wyden Proposal is a good idea (Original Post)
whatchamacallit
Jun 2013
OP
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)1. A good first step
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)2. +1
Octafish
(55,745 posts)3. Who?
Senators Wyden and Udall still fighting against Patriot Act secrecy
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=443717
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)4. I wil always be indebted to people like Snowden
And fuck every little pansy ass government apologist who says differently.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)5. "The bill’s language is based closely on similar legislation that passed the Senate...
Udall and Wyden called on Gen. Keith B. Alexander, the head of the National Security Agency and U.S. Cyber Command, to clarify his remarks last week that the surveillance programs disclosed through leaks and declassification have helped avert "dozens of terrorist attacks" in recent years. They also recently questioned assertions that the NSA's bulk collection of Americans' phone records "has actually provided any uniquely valuable intelligence" beyond what is available through other, less intrusive surveillance programs. The bills language is based closely on similar legislation that passed the Senate by unanimous consent in 2005.
http://www.markudall.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=3507
http://www.markudall.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=3507
The question is what is Congress waiting for?
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)6. Maybe they needed the public backlash to push them
Don't forget to thank Snowden.
allin99
(894 posts)7. i was a little confused about that line....
if something basically the same was already passed why would they need to pass it again, and if it already passed, then what good did it do?