Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 12:05 PM Jun 2013

The US government did not kill investigative journalist Michael Hastings

Last edited Thu Jun 20, 2013, 01:14 PM - Edit history (1)

What happened to Michael Hastings was a tragic accident. His current investigations into the NSA and CIA had nothing to do with his death.

It's important that any conspiracy theories are quashed before they spin out of control and tarnish his legacy.

This is a tragedy and he most definitely will be missed. He was one of the best investigative reporters out there.

------------------------------------

Edit to add post from zappaman:

After the Weekly reported today that LAPD traffic investigators believe the car tied in reports to journalist Michael Hastings was going faster than 60 miles per hour before a fatal crash in Hollywood, we were tipped off to new video showing a vehicle blasting through a red light just moments before that collision.
The video, by freelance TV news crew LOUD LABS NEWS, shows a vehicle blazing through a red light on Highland Avenue and Santa Monica Boulevard, only four blocks from the crash:
The video appears to have been taken from a LOUD LABS vehicle awaiting the night's news.

Freelance videographers work the night shift in L.A. because local TV stations don't budget enough for expensive, three-person news vans to work overnight. The freelance crews listen to police scanners and sell their footage to the stations.

http://blogs.laweekly.com/informer/2013/06/michael_hastings_red_light_video_speeding.php

117 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The US government did not kill investigative journalist Michael Hastings (Original Post) Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 OP
Because the government has never killed anyone, or... The Link Jun 2013 #1
Motive does not equal guilt. Liberal Veteran Jun 2013 #8
The question on whether their was government involvement is legitimate avaistheone1 Jun 2013 #16
+1 forestpath Jun 2013 #21
-1 Agschmid Jun 2013 #43
+1 bahrbearian Jun 2013 #47
Sounds like your mind is made up to me. stopbush Jun 2013 #102
Having an open mind and asking a question does Not equal having made up my mine. I haven't. avaistheone1 Jun 2013 #104
+1 more. Smarmie Doofus Jun 2013 #105
It doesn't equal innocence, either. EOTE Jun 2013 #17
Presumption of innocence. Liberal Veteran Jun 2013 #28
Presumption of innocence is not the same thing as declaring innocence. EOTE Jun 2013 #31
You are free to believe what you will. Liberal Veteran Jun 2013 #36
Presumption of innocence has to do with an accused person's status . . . markpkessinger Jun 2013 #113
the fact is that there is zero evidence that there was foul play involved, let alone geek tragedy Jun 2013 #54
There is also zero evidence it wasn't involved. EOTE Jun 2013 #58
There is zero evidence Justin Bieber wasn't involved. Should we treat his involvement as geek tragedy Jun 2013 #74
Get a grip BainsBane Jun 2013 #25
Whew! I am glad thats settled. Katashi_itto Jun 2013 #26
"Government spying on citizens is only done in countries like the USSR, Art_from_Ark Jun 2013 #96
What's the point of killing a journalist? treestar Jun 2013 #37
Right. And no one with a history of alcohol and drugs pnwmom Jun 2013 #61
I'm sure the first thing they'll test for is Scopolamine think Jun 2013 #106
+1000. premium Jun 2013 #2
you can't quash cts and how on earth would this one "tarnish his legacy"? cali Jun 2013 #3
So, you're open to thinking Obama had Mr Hastings killed? DevonRex Jun 2013 #51
No. And I've made that crystal fucking clear. cali Jun 2013 #84
Oh really. Odd reaction to the OP then since DevonRex Jun 2013 #107
bullshit. how dare you. You have a lot of fucking nerve, cali Jun 2013 #110
But you don't actually squash any CTs, you just reinforced them Rex Jun 2013 #4
Wow, I hope you are alright. EOTE Jun 2013 #5
Who said the government killed Hastings? railsback Jun 2013 #6
Pretty much Recursion Jun 2013 #15
Did InfoWars take over DU giftedgirl77 Jun 2013 #52
The same loons that thought the government was lying about WMDs to start a war NoOneMan Jun 2013 #82
If the Gov't insists on "investigating" reporters they will also have to put up with bemildred Jun 2013 #7
This topic will provide endless infotainment on DU Floyd_Gondolli Jun 2013 #9
It's making me sick. Like I'm in the company of the DevonRex Jun 2013 #55
Best solution is to make fun of them rather than insulting or debating. geek tragedy Jun 2013 #56
The purpose of the whole world is to entertain you? MNBrewer Jun 2013 #80
Did you notice "infotainment" in the post to which I replied? Part of which comes from DevonRex Jun 2013 #98
Same here. When is "enough is enough" time, Skinner and Co.? FSogol Jun 2013 #92
Nothing DevonRex Jun 2013 #97
Hillary Clinton had him killed via automobile for asking hard questions about Libya. WilliamPitt Jun 2013 #10
Vince Foster was the second gunman who killed Hastings from the grassy knoll. Orrex Jun 2013 #14
I wonder if they will chalk up another victim in the "Clinton body count" Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #23
I prefer to wait for the facts quinnox Jun 2013 #11
That's not the New Yorker. Its NY Magazine, also a decent publication but it is not Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #27
Yea, thanks, I missed that quinnox Jun 2013 #99
Odd details, but this quote from the article says it for me: let's wait for the facts. mountain grammy Jun 2013 #108
Quashed! whatchamacallit Jun 2013 #12
I don't know, the picture's still a bit murky on this. randome Jun 2013 #13
Seems like a map of one of the PvP areas from Dark Age of Camelot, I think the Keep was called TheKentuckian Jun 2013 #71
No one knows yet. But I would tend to agree. n-t Logical Jun 2013 #18
And you know this because...? avaistheone1 Jun 2013 #19
See my update Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #66
This is certainly going to put more attention on his call for the press to go to "war" with the Gov. dkf Jun 2013 #20
You're welcome Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #70
I think we should wait for more facts before deciding one way or another. snot Jun 2013 #22
Your post is just declaration of your opinion, and as I rarely agree with your opinions I'll have to Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #24
And each side doesn't do that? Funny accusation run rampant, though no one still_one Jun 2013 #35
I think we agree on more things than you might imagine Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #53
He killed himself driving recklessly like so many other folks in SoCal do. kestrel91316 Jun 2013 #29
Did he have any speeding tickets adric mutelovic Jun 2013 #34
He certainly had a violation that night. zappaman Jun 2013 #42
"... In his first book, I Lost My Love in Baghdad: A Modern War Story, Hastings says that he crashed struggle4progress Jun 2013 #57
Or he simply drove recklessly pnwmom Jun 2013 #63
It is much easier to pile on to the president especially since there are no facts to back up the still_one Jun 2013 #30
The president has much more important citizens to drone kill NoOneMan Jun 2013 #88
Whatever still_one Jun 2013 #94
Thanks for your opinion adric mutelovic Jun 2013 #32
You don't know that. HooptieWagon Jun 2013 #33
This place has truly become unbelievable alcibiades_mystery Jun 2013 #38
This site is just too funny sometimes. bunnies Jun 2013 #39
How in the hell would you know? Vinnie From Indy Jun 2013 #40
Absolutely right. zappaman Jun 2013 #41
Thank you. n/t Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #44
Are you saying they made his gas pedal stick? RobertEarl Jun 2013 #48
This still doesn't exclude the possibility that his accelerator and brakes might have been failing.. cascadiance Jun 2013 #49
OP has been updated with evidence. n/t Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #45
Evidence from zappaman? Octafish Jun 2013 #86
Yes it appears the car was speeding. Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #87
The car matches the car that hit the tree. zappaman Jun 2013 #90
Not directly, I agree. But... MindPilot Jun 2013 #46
The government drugged him, loaded him up with Progressive dog Jun 2013 #50
I got two ignores today BainsBane Jun 2013 #59
Wear them with pride Progressive dog Jun 2013 #60
This message was self-deleted by its author Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #62
You don't even wanna know how many I picked up recently Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #64
someone told me I was in denial BainsBane Jun 2013 #65
I'm up to 70. geek tragedy Jun 2013 #69
Now, now, "the government" is presumed guilty treestar Jun 2013 #111
It's not a binary "the government did it" vs. "simple accident" starroute Jun 2013 #67
It was a tragic accident. n/t Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #68
Correct: "suspicious". The difficulty w. "sitting back and waiting"... Smarmie Doofus Jun 2013 #112
One thing about murderers ... Deny and Shred Jun 2013 #72
As long as we don't blame Obama warrprayer Jun 2013 #73
What are you talking about? Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #75
nothing at all. n/t warrprayer Jun 2013 #76
Go sell crazy some place else Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #77
and the masks warrprayer Jun 2013 #81
I've noticed you've been following me around lately since I called you a board nanny Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #85
follow you around? Really? LMAO warrprayer Jun 2013 #89
" I don't hold a grudge" Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #91
OK. warrprayer Jun 2013 #93
Taunting people is cute? And enjoying it? HangOnKids Jun 2013 #109
How the hell do YOU know? MNBrewer Jun 2013 #78
Its as unlikely that he was killed as the theory that the government is spying on us NoOneMan Jun 2013 #79
yes warrprayer Jun 2013 #83
Oh lordy, some people truly are stuck on stupid. tritsofme Jun 2013 #95
OH GOOD GOD, you're taking LAPD's word? The Rodney King/Rampart/Macarthur Park LAPD???? Fire Walk With Me Jun 2013 #100
Ridiculous thread Trajan Jun 2013 #101
This is truly dennis4868 Jun 2013 #103
Obama is not the government. reusrename Jun 2013 #114
So your opinion is that it must have been a suicide? cbdo2007 Jun 2013 #115
I watched the video ... Eddie Haskell Jun 2013 #116
The damage is consistent with a bomb. Eddie Haskell Jun 2013 #117
 

The Link

(757 posts)
1. Because the government has never killed anyone, or...
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 12:07 PM
Jun 2013

because the government had no vested interest in Hastings' death?

 

avaistheone1

(14,626 posts)
16. The question on whether their was government involvement is legitimate
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 12:32 PM
Jun 2013

since we do not know whether they had some role or not -particularly given our government has not has a great history regarding how it handles its critics, opposition, truth-tellers or whisteblowers. imo

My mind is open on this one.

 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
105. +1 more.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 10:15 PM
Jun 2013

Why some DUers are so anxious for this topic to disappear is truly a puzzler.

They won't be able to sleep if someone on the internet thinks it might have been a gov't hit?

Or a hit from some other source.

EOTE

(13,409 posts)
17. It doesn't equal innocence, either.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 12:32 PM
Jun 2013

And to immediately claim that there is no foul play involved in his death is jumping to conclusions in a much more insidious way than any CTer could.

EOTE

(13,409 posts)
31. Presumption of innocence is not the same thing as declaring innocence.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 01:00 PM
Jun 2013

And then denigrating those who might believe otherwise. Especially when so little is known about the accident. Dismissing wrong doing right off the bat is especially stupid considering the government's penchant for going after ones they deem a threat.

Liberal Veteran

(22,239 posts)
36. You are free to believe what you will.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 01:03 PM
Jun 2013

It is all Vince Foster stuff in my mind until actual evidence is put forward.

markpkessinger

(8,395 posts)
113. Presumption of innocence has to do with an accused person's status . . .
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 08:49 AM
Jun 2013

. . . before a court of law, and nothing more.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
54. the fact is that there is zero evidence that there was foul play involved, let alone
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 02:40 PM
Jun 2013

when of those scary government conspiracies Alex Jones is always warning us about.

EOTE

(13,409 posts)
58. There is also zero evidence it wasn't involved.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 02:46 PM
Jun 2013

Yet people feel the need to make bizarre proclamations that they know the truth of the situation and immediately dismissing anything resembling a conspiracy because it makes them uncomfortable. TPTB count on this very behavior. Those wacky "Grassy knoll conspiracy theorists" need to be put in their place, you know. We all know the conspiracies never occur, so best to simply mock those who believe they can at every opportunity.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
74. There is zero evidence Justin Bieber wasn't involved. Should we treat his involvement as
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 06:06 PM
Jun 2013

a serious possibility?

Those making the allegation/suggestion have the burden of providing proof. Otherwise, they're just making shit up.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
96. "Government spying on citizens is only done in countries like the USSR,
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 08:01 PM
Jun 2013

East Germany, Red China and North Korea. We live in a free society where it would never be condoned, much less accepted."*

*Quote is from my 1970s American Government teacher

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
61. Right. And no one with a history of alcohol and drugs
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 03:16 PM
Jun 2013

ever fell off the wagon and had another DUI.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
106. I'm sure the first thing they'll test for is Scopolamine
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 11:42 PM
Jun 2013

That'll put all the conspiracy theories to rest.




In 1910, it was detected in the remains believed to be those of Cora Crippen, wife of Dr. Hawley Harvey Crippen, and was accepted at the time as the cause of her death, since her husband was known to have bought some at the start of the year.[19]

In 2008, Vice News aired an episode called "Colombian Devil's Breath" recounting the use of scopolamine by Colombian criminals as a suggestion drug. The two-part investigation contains multiple first-hand accounts of its use.[20]

A 2012 example claims small amounts are blown into victims' faces on the street to turn the victims into "mindless zombies".[21]

Scopolamine has been used under the name burundanga in Venezuelan and Thailand resorts in order to drug and then rob tourists. While there are unfounded rumors that delivery mechanisms include using pamphlets and flyers laced with the drug, not enough is readily absorbed through the skin to have an effect. However, spiked alcoholic drinks are occasionally used.

In recent years the criminal use of scopolamine has become an epidemic. Approximately half of emergency room admissions for poisoning in Bogotá have been attributed to scopolamine.[22]

Victims of this crime are often admitted to a hospital in police custody, under the assumption that the patient is experiencing a psychotic episode.[citation needed] A telltale sign is a fever accompanied by a lack of sweat.[citation needed]

Scopolamine is used criminally as a date rape drug and as an aid to robbery,[23] the most common act being the clandestine drugging of a victim's drink.[23] It is preferred because it induces anterograde amnesia, or an inability to recall events a certain amount of time after its administration or during the time of intoxication.[citation needed]

Per the United States State Department (March 4, 2012):

"One common and particularly dangerous method that criminals use in order to rob a victim is through the use of drugs. The most common has been scopolamine. Unofficial estimates put the number of annual scopolamine incidents in Colombia at approximately 50,000. Scopolamine can render a victim unconscious for 24 hours or more. In large doses, it can cause respiratory failure and death. It is most often administered in liquid or powder form in foods and beverages. The majority of these incidents occur in night clubs and bars, and usually men, perceived to be wealthy, are targeted by young, attractive women. To avoid becoming a victim of scopolamine, one should never accept food or beverages offered by strangers or new acquaintances or leave food or beverages unattended. Victims of scopolamine or other drugs should seek immediate medical attention."[24]

~Snip~

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scopolamine#Criminal_use


 

premium

(3,731 posts)
2. +1000.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 12:09 PM
Jun 2013

I know that the U.S. govt. has ordered the assassination of people, but that's not the case here, it was a tragic accident not related to what he was investigating.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
3. you can't quash cts and how on earth would this one "tarnish his legacy"?
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 12:10 PM
Jun 2013

the problem with most cts is that there is virtually no way to convince the believers that it is a ct. it's pointless to try. for instance, if Hastings has a high blood alcohol content, the response will be that "they" could have arranged that.

That said we don't know anything yet about what happened.

your op, btw, will do the opposite of quashing this.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
84. No. And I've made that crystal fucking clear.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 06:33 PM
Jun 2013

and nothing in the post I wrote that you are responding to indicates any fucking such thing. so screw your nasty, silly gotcha question

I have never disrespected President Obama with that kind of dogshit and you know it.

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
107. Oh really. Odd reaction to the OP then since
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 12:59 AM
Jun 2013

you effectively told him that he couldn't post the video of Mr. Hastings running a red light 2 minutes prior to his accident without spreading the conspiracy theory that Obama had Mr. Hastings murdered. Seriously? Anyone who has been accused of anything has to STFU? AND anyone who would defend someone ELSE who's been accused of something has to STFU and if they don't it's their fault the accusations happened in the first place?

Your reply to the OP contains a fair amount of negativity. Never once did you express any exasperation that idiots would start these kinds of rumors about Obama. But you did say there's just no use in even trying to combat the conspiracy theories. And you were just horrified that the OP mentioned that those CTs can also harm the original victim, as if conspiracy theory freaks give a shit who they have to drag through the mud when they have to change course - as they always do when one bizarre theory hits the inevitable dead end.

So, in my opinion, your post was just a way to say STFU. As is the way you talked to me just now. But I won't be intimidated. Not when people on this very site are insinuating administration involvement in Hastings' death. Oh yeah, and speaking up against that stupid RW CT bullshit isn't the CAUSE of the Hastings CT bullshit. The Hastings conspiracy theorists have to bear that responsibility all by themselves. See, his name is already linked to something he never intended. And it sure as fuck isn't the fault of people trying to dispel the crazy.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
110. bullshit. how dare you. You have a lot of fucking nerve,
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 04:55 AM
Jun 2013

Here's my post. Then let's examine the crap YOU fucking make up and fling at me:

you can't quash cts and how on earth would this one "tarnish his legacy"?

the problem with most cts is that there is virtually no way to convince the believers that it is a ct. it's pointless to try. for instance, if Hastings has a high blood alcohol content, the response will be that "they" could have arranged that.

That said we don't know anything yet about what happened.

your op, btw, will do the opposite of quashing this.



I didn't even fucking mention a video, let alone tell the op that he couldn't post it. and you know what, genius? I

Yeah, my reply was negative. So the fuck what? It's was a silly OP for the very reasons I mentioned. duh. try reading for comprehension.

YOU need help with your reading skills. You read into my post so much shit that wasn't there, it's like you read another post entirely. It's paranoid and none too swift. sad, dear.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
4. But you don't actually squash any CTs, you just reinforced them
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 12:11 PM
Jun 2013

with your instant disclaimer. Funny how that works.

EOTE

(13,409 posts)
5. Wow, I hope you are alright.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 12:12 PM
Jun 2013

Things must have been awfully scary in that crash. I'm so glad you made it out in one piece and you're able to relay the story to us.

 

railsback

(1,881 posts)
6. Who said the government killed Hastings?
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 12:13 PM
Jun 2013

Are these the same people who say the government is listening to every single person in the U.S.?

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
7. If the Gov't insists on "investigating" reporters they will also have to put up with
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 12:14 PM
Jun 2013

theories that they might have done something more. It's not exactly an original idea or an uncommon occurrence for some reporter to get offed for sticking his nose in the wrong place, and anyone paying attention knows reporters are unusually prone to "accidents".

 

Floyd_Gondolli

(1,277 posts)
9. This topic will provide endless infotainment on DU
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 12:14 PM
Jun 2013

Not just this thread but the many that will come after it. I suspect there will be a lot of burning hair.


DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
55. It's making me sick. Like I'm in the company of the
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 02:40 PM
Jun 2013

Vince Foster conspiracy theorists. This has gone way too far.
I am not entertained.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
56. Best solution is to make fun of them rather than insulting or debating.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 02:41 PM
Jun 2013

Eventually, they'll decide it's not worth the mockery.

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
98. Did you notice "infotainment" in the post to which I replied? Part of which comes from
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 09:16 PM
Jun 2013

"entertainment" you might or might not know. If not, then you've learned something - gotten some information - the "info" portion of the aforementioned word. See how that works? Thus far, I've found every single person who believes that the Obama Administration might have had Hastings killed to be lacking in any accurate information and certainly none of their nutty conspiracy musings are even slightly entertaining. Just as none of the Clintons' stalker-serial-conspiracy theorists were entertaining in the 90s. But at least none of them claimed to be liberal.

 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
10. Hillary Clinton had him killed via automobile for asking hard questions about Libya.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 12:17 PM
Jun 2013

Read that one yesterday on Facebook.

Y'know...I'm sure there were just as many batshit crazy fever-dream nutbag people in America before the internet. Isn't it great that they all have a place to meet each other now so they can make little crazies out of their big crazies? Progress, y'all.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
11. I prefer to wait for the facts
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 12:20 PM
Jun 2013

But, a quick google search turned up this interesting article from the New Yorker magazine. There were some odd details about his death.

Anyone who is interested - http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/06/michael-hastings-fbi-wikileaks-death-conspiracies.html

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
27. That's not the New Yorker. Its NY Magazine, also a decent publication but it is not
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 12:57 PM
Jun 2013

the New Yorker. Easy mistake to make....

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
99. Yea, thanks, I missed that
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 09:17 PM
Jun 2013

heh, I'm not familiar with East Coast stuff (never been very far East), so I assumed it was the New Yorker, I didn't know about the "NY Magazine".

mountain grammy

(26,620 posts)
108. Odd details, but this quote from the article says it for me: let's wait for the facts.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 01:11 AM
Jun 2013

Mother Jones editor Clara Jeffery put it plainly: "Ugh, the people posting Vince Foster style comments re Hastings death do a disservice to his no BS truth telling." Let's wait for the facts.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
13. I don't know, the picture's still a bit murky on this.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 12:24 PM
Jun 2013

When I Google 'Snowden magic', this is the first image that appears. Now try to explain that!



[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font]
[hr]

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
71. Seems like a map of one of the PvP areas from Dark Age of Camelot, I think the Keep was called
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 05:05 PM
Jun 2013

Snowden's for the Norse area.

 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
20. This is certainly going to put more attention on his call for the press to go to "war" with the Gov.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 12:35 PM
Jun 2013

Hastings actually said that..the Press needs to go to war against the government and they should not cooperate in any manner with the government when doing national security stories.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023051146

Prior to your post I was thinking it was a ridiculous notion and what could Michael Hastings possibly say or do that would make him a target. Now that you bring it up, I can see why they would have not wanted to deal with him if he made this a crusade.

So I don't seriously entertain the idea that the Government had him killed...yet...but thanks for bringing this to my notice.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
70. You're welcome
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 04:57 PM
Jun 2013

Let me know any additional information you find out as you research this.

Thank gawd you're on top of this.

snot

(10,524 posts)
22. I think we should wait for more facts before deciding one way or another.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 12:44 PM
Jun 2013

F.w.i.w., per http://www.nsc.org/news_resources/injury_and_death_statistics/Documents/Injury_Facts_43.pdf , as of 2009, if I've done the math correctly, the lifetime odds of any particular individual's dying in a car accident were ca. 0.24%.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
24. Your post is just declaration of your opinion, and as I rarely agree with your opinions I'll have to
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 12:55 PM
Jun 2013

go read up on the story, assuming that you are 100% incorrect because you offer zero support and preach a faith based sort of sermonette, I tire of the sermonette society and prefer those who persuade with fact and that sort of thing.
That fact free faith crap is how centrists sell everything.

still_one

(92,190 posts)
35. And each side doesn't do that? Funny accusation run rampant, though no one
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 01:02 PM
Jun 2013

needs proof if it justifies their position

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
29. He killed himself driving recklessly like so many other folks in SoCal do.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 12:58 PM
Jun 2013

He may have been a good journalist, but on the road it seems he was a menace to society.

zappaman

(20,606 posts)
42. He certainly had a violation that night.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 01:08 PM
Jun 2013
http://blogs.laweekly.com/informer/2013/06/michael_hastings_red_light_video_speeding.php

After the Weekly reported today that LAPD traffic investigators believe the car tied in reports to journalist Michael Hastings was going faster than 60 miles per hour before a fatal crash in Hollywood, we were tipped off to new video showing a vehicle blasting through a red light just moments before that collision.
The video, by freelance TV news crew LOUD LABS NEWS, shows a vehicle blazing through a red light on Highland Avenue and Santa Monica Boulevard, only four blocks from the crash:
The video appears to have been taken from a LOUD LABS vehicle awaiting the night's news.

Freelance videographers work the night shift in L.A. because local TV stations don't budget enough for expensive, three-person news vans to work overnight. The freelance crews listen to police scanners and sell their footage to the stations.

struggle4progress

(118,282 posts)
57. "... In his first book, I Lost My Love in Baghdad: A Modern War Story, Hastings says that he crashed
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 02:43 PM
Jun 2013

a car in a drunk driving accident when he was 19 ...
Michael Hastings Crash: Car Was Speeding, Engine Flew 100 Feet, Cops Say
By Dennis Romero
Wed., Jun. 19 2013 at 4:37 PM
http://blogs.laweekly.com/informer/2013/06/michael_hastings_crash_engine_flew_speeding_recovery.php

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
63. Or he simply drove recklessly
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 03:18 PM
Jun 2013

after falling off the wagon. It's not unheard of. And it's not unheard of to simply have a heart attack or stroke while driving -- it happened to a thirty-something friend of ours while he was playing tennis.

But the most common cause of an accident like that, late at night, involves substance abuse of some sort.

still_one

(92,190 posts)
30. It is much easier to pile on to the president especially since there are no facts to back up the
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 01:00 PM
Jun 2013

Assertion that the government was involved

Much of these innuendos is perfect joe McCarthy tactics, they don't need proof

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
88. The president has much more important citizens to drone kill
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 06:40 PM
Jun 2013

Why would he waste his time with Hastings? Where is it implied this has anything to do with Obama? Why the knee-jerk defense? Do you even evaluate what happens anymore, or just how it could reflect on Obama? Can you perceive any even close to reality if all you are thinking about is how it relates to the president?

People can certainly be suspicious if a renegade reporter with enemies in a corrupt, intrustive Government dies without so much as thinking about the guy behind the podium being involved.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
33. You don't know that.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 01:01 PM
Jun 2013

Although a lower probability than other possible causes, it has not been eliminated as a possible cause. Wishful thinking or blind obedience doesn't change that fact.

 

bunnies

(15,859 posts)
39. This site is just too funny sometimes.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 01:06 PM
Jun 2013

Ive seen people questioning Snowdens connections called 'truthers' on DU. And yet... days later this CT floats around.

edit: clarity

Vinnie From Indy

(10,820 posts)
40. How in the hell would you know?
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 01:07 PM
Jun 2013

Unless you provide DU with your inside knowledge of this matter, why would anyone take your comments seriously? I really miss the unrec button sometimes.

Cheers!

zappaman

(20,606 posts)
41. Absolutely right.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 01:07 PM
Jun 2013

and now we have video of his car before the wreck.

After the Weekly reported today that LAPD traffic investigators believe the car tied in reports to journalist Michael Hastings was going faster than 60 miles per hour before a fatal crash in Hollywood, we were tipped off to new video showing a vehicle blasting through a red light just moments before that collision.
The video, by freelance TV news crew LOUD LABS NEWS, shows a vehicle blazing through a red light on Highland Avenue and Santa Monica Boulevard, only four blocks from the crash:
The video appears to have been taken from a LOUD LABS vehicle awaiting the night's news.

Freelance videographers work the night shift in L.A. because local TV stations don't budget enough for expensive, three-person news vans to work overnight. The freelance crews listen to police scanners and sell their footage to the stations.

http://blogs.laweekly.com/informer/2013/06/michael_hastings_red_light_video_speeding.php

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
48. Are you saying they made his gas pedal stick?
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 02:05 PM
Jun 2013

You know it all, can you give us ANY details about the crash? Please?

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
49. This still doesn't exclude the possibility that his accelerator and brakes might have been failing..
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 02:27 PM
Jun 2013

... which might have been due to someone screwing up his car. This video perhaps might dismiss the possibility that he was being chased by someone though. I do hope they check his transmission (that looks like it flew away so that it wasn't damaged as much by fire) and his car to see if it might have been tampered with. And if the cops are doing their job, they'll try to track back when he was with his car and when he wasn't to see if there was any opportunity for someone to have done such a tampering too. Don't know how badly his body was burned, but hopefully not so much that they could do enough of a study on it to verify if he had or hadn't been affected by drinking or using other inebriating substances.

We should not be out there saying someone killed him, but at the same time, we shouldn't dismiss the possibility of foul play yet until those who are investigating it have the chance to finish their jobs. Any abrogation of officials responsibilities in doing a thorough investigation should be watched for and not accepted.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
86. Evidence from zappaman?
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 06:36 PM
Jun 2013

The blog entry from LA Weekly he quoted adds that a car sped through a red light.

That doesn't add evidence to whether the government is in the clear or not.

zappaman

(20,606 posts)
90. The car matches the car that hit the tree.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 06:43 PM
Jun 2013

And a witness reported it going 100mph.
That's called evidence.
You got any that the government was involved?
Bring it.

 

MindPilot

(12,693 posts)
46. Not directly, I agree. But...
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 01:24 PM
Jun 2013

My first thought is that it was a Aaron Swartz suicide because he was being investigated.

OTOH, maybe he just got really drunk and drove crazy until he hit a tree.

Progressive dog

(6,902 posts)
50. The government drugged him, loaded him up with
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 02:29 PM
Jun 2013

alcohol, and put him in a remote control car. They destroyed all non flammable evidence after the crash. They've done this hundreds of times. Mostly they mange to erase all evidence of their existence, but this is the one they screwed up and is proof that it is a government conspiracy.
Thanks for the sane post.

Response to BainsBane (Reply #59)

BainsBane

(53,032 posts)
65. someone told me I was in denial
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 03:21 PM
Jun 2013

for not recognizing the fact the journalist was murdered by the govt. I told him for me to be in denial, there would need to be evidence for me to deny. I also pointed out that I do not under any circumstances consider a tweet evidence.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
111. Now, now, "the government" is presumed guilty
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 05:00 AM
Jun 2013


Which is funny because it would be OK if they controlled the economy in any way or nationalized the banks or prosecuted "the corporatists."

starroute

(12,977 posts)
67. It's not a binary "the government did it" vs. "simple accident"
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 04:14 PM
Jun 2013

He'd already pissed off the military with the McChrystal business. He was supposedly working on a story about Barrett Brown, which brings defense and intelligence contractors into the mix. He may have had other things on the back burner and have started sticking his nose into places where he wasn't welcome.

Right now, if I was a cop I'd be flagging this as suspicious -- if only because who drives down a residential street at 100 miles an hour, no matter how drunk? And if I did find indications of foul play, I'd conclude that the field of possible suspects was wide open.

I'd say that what's called for is to sit back, wait to see how this develops, and not jump to premature conclusions of any kind.

 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
112. Correct: "suspicious". The difficulty w. "sitting back and waiting"...
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 08:03 AM
Jun 2013

...is that no one has confidence in any entity that might conduct an "official" investigation.

LAPD, FBI... the rest of the nat'l security state alphabet soup.

That is the difficulty and the paradox.

Deny and Shred

(1,061 posts)
72. One thing about murderers ...
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 05:23 PM
Jun 2013

... they don't want to leave behind evidence of their crime. Some even plan ahead meticulously and make sure there is no evidence. Some are even so adept that they can fool investigators into believing it was an accident, or suicide.

Smoking gun proof is a high hurdle, and will probably not be forthcoming here, nor in many other murders. State-sponsored political murders are as old as mankind, rarely admitted, and those responsible rarely celebrated. I doubt this is a government hit, but we'll never know anything beyond a fiery car crash. That doesn't completely rule out suspicion. To say otherwise is akin to the same faith that CTers have in the falsity of the cover story.


warrprayer

(4,734 posts)
73. As long as we don't blame Obama
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 06:03 PM
Jun 2013

... it's ok right?

"It's important that any conspiracy theories are quashed before they spin out of control and tarnish his (Obama's) legacy."

fixed that for you!

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
85. I've noticed you've been following me around lately since I called you a board nanny
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 06:36 PM
Jun 2013

Your feelings still hurt from that?

warrprayer

(4,734 posts)
89. follow you around? Really? LMAO
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 06:42 PM
Jun 2013

quite a feat considering I am on a library computer and only have 1.5 hours of time on line any day of the week. Even more incredible considering I don't come here every day. But yes, I do remember the "board nanny" taunt. And no, I don't hold a grudge.

p.s. - The death of Michael Hastings bothered me especially since there is such an effort to smear him posthumously. Let alone the seemingly desperate attempts to write his death off as non-suspicious.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
91. " I don't hold a grudge"
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 06:45 PM
Jun 2013

riiiiiiiiight.

I thought it was a pretty effective taunt actually. So effective that it still obviously bothers you to this day.

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
79. Its as unlikely that he was killed as the theory that the government is spying on us
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 06:29 PM
Jun 2013

Gosh guys. If you want to know the truth just ask the government what happened

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
100. OH GOOD GOD, you're taking LAPD's word? The Rodney King/Rampart/Macarthur Park LAPD????
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 09:23 PM
Jun 2013

There are not enough emoticons.

 

reusrename

(1,716 posts)
114. Obama is not the government.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 09:17 AM
Jun 2013

I don't think anyone here believes that Obama had Hastings killed, so you can take a deep breath and relax.

There is a shadow government that exists. And they are always suspect, of everything, and with good reason.

Just relax and try to come to grips with reality.

Eddie Haskell

(1,628 posts)
117. The damage is consistent with a bomb.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 12:36 PM
Jun 2013

It's obvious, the damage is consistent with a bomb under the dash. The witnesses describe an explosion that shook their house. Another witness saw the car jackknife and parts flying in all directions ... that doesn't happen in a crash. It's basic physics. Look at the pictures.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The US government did not...