Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 07:19 PM Jun 2013

Tokyo court says Samsung infringed Apple 'bounce-back' patent

TOKYO (Reuters) - A Tokyo court ruled on Friday that Samsung Electronics Co Ltd had infringed rival Apple Inc's patent for a so-called bounce-back feature on earlier models of its popular smartphones.

Samsung and Apple, the world's top two smartphone makers, are fighting patent disputes across the globe as they compete to dominate the lucrative mobile market and win customers with their latest gadgets.

Apple claimed that Samsung had copied the feature, in which icons on its smartphones and tablets quiver back when users scroll to the end of an electronic document. Samsung has already changed its interface on recent models to show a blue line at the end of documents.

The Japanese court's decision comes after the U.S. Patent and Trademark office judged earlier this year that Apple's bounce-back patent was invalid, allowing older Samsung models that had a similar feature to remain on sale.

http://news.yahoo.com/tokyo-court-says-samsung-infringed-apple-bounce-back-050406105.html

In the not so distant future, if you buy a Samsung phone, American Apple will make more money off of the purchase than Korean Samsung.

Google is next.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tokyo court says Samsung infringed Apple 'bounce-back' patent (Original Post) onehandle Jun 2013 OP
This is sooo much like the Wright-Curtiss aileron patent wars... Cooley Hurd Jun 2013 #1
If you buy an "Apple phone" WestStar Jun 2013 #2
Keep up. Apple is killing those contracts. onehandle Jun 2013 #3
They've been saying that for years. We used to call that "vaporware" WestStar Jun 2013 #4
 

Cooley Hurd

(26,877 posts)
1. This is sooo much like the Wright-Curtiss aileron patent wars...
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 07:27 PM
Jun 2013

Wing warping vs a movable surface on the trailing edge on the wing. Both did the exact same thing - it banked the aircraft.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wright_brothers_patent_war

 

WestStar

(202 posts)
2. If you buy an "Apple phone"
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 07:31 PM
Jun 2013

Samsung makes almost as much as Apple because they make the processors, memory and many of the screens for the I-Phones.

So they got that goin' for 'em.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
3. Keep up. Apple is killing those contracts.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 08:23 PM
Jun 2013

Pretty soon, Samsung will have to actually do something original to survive.

 

WestStar

(202 posts)
4. They've been saying that for years. We used to call that "vaporware"
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 08:31 PM
Jun 2013

Apple tried to find a manufacturer for the retina display too, they found only Samsung was equipped to do it.

Of course that doesn't mean they won't keep trying. Hell, they dumped Motorola and went with Intel finally too. That was a bit of a "scandal" to the fanbois.

I have no problem with Apple but they don't really make anything, they design it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tokyo court says Samsung ...