Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 09:30 PM Jun 2013

Pentagon says women in all combat units by 2016

Washington (CNN) -- The Pentagon unveiled plans Tuesday for fully integrating women into front-line and special combat roles, including elite forces such as Army Rangers and Navy SEALs.

While Air Force, Army, Navy, Marine and special forces commanders detailed steps they will take, not all shared the same comfort level with the initiative, raising potential real-world scenarios that must be addressed before moving too far forward.

There was concern for how women might handle some of the more taxing physical demands of combat across the board and for how men might view the presence of female troops in tight-knit elite units.

Women are permitted to serve in some hazardous jobs and did so in Iraq and Afghanistan where a number were killed. But it wasn't until January that then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta formally lifted the official ban on women in combat.


http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/18/politics/women-combat/index.html


This discussion is getting lost in all the NSA coverage. What is your opinion on this? Pentagon plans to open pretty much all combat roles to women...including many of the special forces.

Americans dont seem to like the idea though. 9 out of 10 comments on there is very, very negative.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pentagon says women in all combat units by 2016 (Original Post) davidn3600 Jun 2013 OP
Yippee, more canon fodder. Arctic Dave Jun 2013 #1
As long as they can meet the same physical requirements as the men, I don't have any problem. bluedigger Jun 2013 #2
 

Arctic Dave

(13,812 posts)
1. Yippee, more canon fodder.
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 09:40 PM
Jun 2013

If they want to sacrifice themselves to make the corporations richer then who gives a crap.

Stupid will always be stupid.

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
2. As long as they can meet the same physical requirements as the men, I don't have any problem.
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 09:43 PM
Jun 2013

The exact same standards, not the women's standards.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pentagon says women in al...