General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSnowden says he will hand documents over to the foreign press of whatever country is involved,
for them to decide whether the documents should be published or not, without regard to US interests.
Is he now trying to get charged with treason?
http://americablog.com/2013/06/snowden-plans-more-leaks-about-us-spying-abroad-will-let-local-press-decide-whether-to-publish.html
SNIP
If I have time to go through this information, I would like to make it available to journalists in each country to make their own assessment, independent of my bias, as to whether or not the knowledge of US network operations against their people should be published.
Note that Snowden is now admitting a few things. First, that that he plans on releasing the details of US intelligence efforts against far more countries. Whos next? Exposing US efforts against Iran, against Cuba, against North Korea? Against Syria?
SNIP
After he sorts through the documents, Edward Snowden says he will let journalists in those countries decide whether its safe and appropriate to print the classified documents he took from American intelligence, and whether the information hes released poses a danger to our country. He wouldnt want to let his bias as a former NSA employee, someone who actually understands the damage these documents can pose to American lives, interfere with the determination of the damage these documents might pose to American lives. Hed rather let non-experts, foreign experts, decide if information they dont fully understand puts American lives at risk.
Does Edward Snowden really think the press in any foreign country is going to show a lack of bias, as he puts it, as to whether the classified information in their hands is damaging to the United States national security, or that it will put American or other lives at risk? Who is the Chinese press going to side with? How about the Russian media? How about Iran? Or North Korea? Or Syria?
SNIP
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts).
Arctic Dave
(13,812 posts)Sooner the better.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)krawhitham
(4,644 posts)He got the job for the sole season of stealing NSA data
Hekate
(90,674 posts)kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)Hekate
(90,674 posts)... some of the pieces we know about him, what we have is this:
high school GED
highly intelligent
high-achieving but narrowly focused
self taught (and/or learned on the job)
seems to have a cyber-based/internet-based ethos, rather than a recognizable political ideology
What he has missed in his education, quite likely, is the classroom work we used to call Civics, as well as history of any kind. What he has missed is real-life experience outside of the logic of his head and his chosen work.
Greenwald, as we know, has an agenda of his own. I don't know how those two hooked up, but Greenwald may have filled a gap in Snowden's thinking and provided him with a focus for his anger. Or maybe Snowden's thoughts had already clicked into place, and Greenwald just presented him with an ideology that sounded like it fit.
I'm just trying to work out why it is that Snowden seems to be all over the place, and not just geographically.
Hekate
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)is the possibility that he might be somewhere on the autism spectrum -- explaining why he appears to be such a black and white thinker and why he didn't seem to anticipate the reaction he's been getting from the public.
In my community there's a higher number of Asperger's people than average, mostly because of the computer industry. If that is his situation it could explain some things. And whatever made him what he is, the government better figure out how they can keep classified information safer from now on.
siligut
(12,272 posts)One of his attorneys also said he was a kid. Though he said it was because Ed prefers Pepsi to wine, I think it may have something to do with his naivete.
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)Blue_Roses
(12,894 posts)Last edited Tue Jun 25, 2013, 06:17 AM - Edit history (1)
possible Asperger's. Several things come to mind. But, it's hard to know for sure with such limited information.(on his medical history).
Asperger Syndrome
A.D.A.M. Medical Encyclopedia.
Asperger Syndrome
Autistic spectrum disorder - Asperger
Asperger Syndrome is often considered a high functioning form of autism. It can lead to difficulty interacting socially, repeat behaviors, and clumsiness.
-snip-
Asperger syndrome is a pervasive developmental disorder (PDD) or autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The main difference between Asperger syndrome and autistic disorder is that children with Asperger syndrome do not have speech or cognitive delays.
The condition appears to be more common in boys than in girls.
Although people with Asperger syndrome often have difficulty socially, many have above-average intelligence. They may excel in fields such as computer programming and science. There is no delay in their cognitive development, ability to take care of themselves, or curiosity about their environment
more...
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0002516/#adam_001549.disease.symptoms
-----------------
Just to be clear, this could possibly explain some of his baffling and bizarre behavior. Not diagnosing
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)a shy person (not maintaining eye contact, for example). But I've wondered. It would also fit with him being clearly so bright and yet having difficulty getting through school.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)pnwmom
(108,977 posts)At least that's the rumor.
treestar
(82,383 posts)This is just ridiculous.
siligut
(12,272 posts)Even though it makes Obama's job even harder and it may create difficult foreign relations, the NSA has gotten out of control.
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)and spying on our own citizens. Too many people are making incredibly flaky calls for pure transparency and no international spying.
As if China and Russia will stop because we do. . . .
siligut
(12,272 posts)And all of our electronic communications are being recorded and stored.
treestar
(82,383 posts)is gross exaggeration.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)Everybody isn't China and Russia and China would be very difficult to prove on paper as an enemy at all. You look at the trade, the money lent and borrowed, they have most favored status, we buy their shit, they can buy our property, they have McDonald's and KFC.
That war is sub-zero.