Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DesMoinesDem

(1,569 posts)
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 08:45 PM Jun 2013

Dirty Wars author Jeremy Scahill: is journalism being criminalised? – video interview

http://m.guardiannews.com/commentisfree/video/2013/jun/25/dirty-wars-jeremy-scahill-video-interview

In the wake of whistleblower Edward Snowden's leak of NSA files, Jeremy Scahill, author of Dirty Wars: The World is a Battlefield and featured reporter in the new documentary film of the same name, says under the Obama administration journalists are being intruded upon and whistleblowers are being charged with crimes. Scahill is also a national security correspondent for the Nation
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dirty Wars author Jeremy Scahill: is journalism being criminalised? – video interview (Original Post) DesMoinesDem Jun 2013 OP
i think that's ecuador JI7 Jun 2013 #1
Oh, look! Another libertarian spouting more of the same tired bullshit! struggle4progress Jun 2013 #2
Oh look! Another struggle4progress post spouting more of the same tired bullshit! MNBrewer Jun 2013 #4
And he's wrong. See post #5 Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #6
Wrong?? THAT poster??? WRONG????11?!?1? MNBrewer Jun 2013 #7
I hated to do it to him. Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #9
4 progress, I guess? MNBrewer Jun 2013 #11
struggle4progress exists to shoot messengers MNBrewer Jun 2013 #8
Schahill on Rand Paul Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #5
Regarding the filibuster Savannahmann Jun 2013 #10
Wendy Davis has managed to do it for 9 hours. Texas rules require that the challenger stay on topic. Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #12
Scahill is always worth listening to... ljm2002 Jun 2013 #3
kr HiPointDem Jun 2013 #13

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
5. Schahill on Rand Paul
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 09:13 PM
Jun 2013
Scahill: Rand Paul is a Libertarian. I think it’s really unfortunate that the one senator that started to raise legitimate questions not just about the drone program but the targeting of U.S. citizens and what’s the standard, how does an American get on the kill list, how do they get off the kill list, how do you surrender to a drone.

I would say that about a third of Rand Paul’s filibuster was sane and some of the best information that’s been put on the public record, and then the other two-thirds was this kind of bizarre Tea Party carnival where it was almost like a burlesque show or something.

They roll onto the floor of the Senate and it was like a hodgepodge of every crazy conspiracy theory that they have about President Obama – how he wants to come after the Tea Party zine editor in a café in Montana, and they’re going to drone-bomb this person from the Tea Party.

I think it was a sort of two-edged sword. On the one hand I’m glad that Rand Paul did that, and he tried to hold up the nomination of Brennan on these very serious issues. On the other hand, I think it diminished the seriousness of the issue, because quite frankly, I think Rand Paul has utterly reprehensible views on so many things.

We could spend hours talking about some of the despicable positions of Rand Paul and other people within the Tea Party. On this issue, I do think that he was being sincere in wanting to raise issues about it, but then he flips his position on it a couple weeks later and talks about drone-bombing someone who robbed a liquor store.


So that’s unfortunate. If someone like – if we had a credible Democratic senator, someone like Dick Durbin out of Illinois, who said, “You know what? I’m a major supporter of this president, but this has gone too far and I want to hold serious hearings of this to see is our national security being degraded by our pursuit of a small group of terrorists and our killing of a larger group of civilians? What are the actual national security implications of that?”


http://www.pbs.org/wnet/tavissmiley/interviews/investigative-journalist-jeremy-scahill/
 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
10. Regarding the filibuster
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 09:21 PM
Jun 2013

First, let me say that Rand is a nut. I agree with you that he raised serious questions on the Drone Strike programs, and I agree it's sad he is about the only one doing so.

However, if you told me that I had to speak for hours on end nonstop, I could probably fill and hour, or two, with well conceived and well expressed opinions based in logic and common constitutional sense. After that, I would be floundering, any of us would be. The strain of standing and talking would get to you, and the strain of perpetually making sure you spoke logically and reasonably would almost be too much for any of us.

So I can forgive him for that, which is another reason I didn't watch it live. I figured 90% of it would be repetitive filler, and I had other things to do.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dirty Wars author Jeremy ...