Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If for nothing else, this is why elections have consequences, The Supreme Court (Original Post) still_one Jun 2013 OP
+1 pinto Jun 2013 #1
Absolutely. HappyMe Jun 2013 #2
For sure! Puglover Jun 2013 #3
don't ever tell me both parties are the same. Scotus nominees matter Coexist Jun 2013 #4
Sotomayor voted against us on the Prop 8 case. Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #5
The issue seems to have been exclusively about standing BainsBane Jun 2013 #6
Seems? Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #7
They rule on points of law BainsBane Jun 2013 #9
Yep. Maybe the Democratic leaders should do a better job of inspiring people to go vote for them quinnox Jun 2013 #8
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
5. Sotomayor voted against us on the Prop 8 case.
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 10:47 AM
Jun 2013

So. Of the 4 votes cast on two cases by Obama appointees, 3 out of 4 were not soaked in bigotry and contempt for gay people. Don't be sad,3 out of 4 ain't bad....

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
7. Seems?
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 11:06 AM
Jun 2013

As a pragmatist, her 'thinking' is only proven by her actions. She voted with the right wing. I am glad she was with us on DOMA, I expected her to vote against us on that one too.

BainsBane

(53,032 posts)
9. They rule on points of law
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 11:09 AM
Jun 2013

I say seems because I've only read the SCOTUS blog summary, not the ruling or dissent as it's not yet posted. Justices don't vote like politicians. The rule on points of law. The prop 8 ruling didn't touch the merits of the case. They ruled exclusively on the point that a private citizen does not have standing to challenge constitutionality when the state does not. They made no determination about whether gay marriage was constitutional in that ruling.

You can go to SCOTUS blog in a bit and read the ruling yourself, or read the summaries on the live blog now.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If for nothing else, this...