Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

diabeticman

(3,121 posts)
4. HELL YEAH!!! My wife will be so pleased. Her Best friend from college has been waiting
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 07:35 PM
Jun 2013

to marry his partner

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
6. Two reasons. 1) Lower courts had found it did have standing, and 2)
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 07:40 PM
Jun 2013

it only take 4 votes to take a case.

And the decision was 5-4, so 4 votes still thought it had standing.

dairydog91

(951 posts)
7. The original District Court ruling is reinstated.
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 07:42 PM
Jun 2013

SCOTUS threw out the Perry case at both its own level and at the Circuit level. The majority held that the traditional marriage group which was bringing the appeal of the original District Court decision lacked standing. Since Federal Courts can only hear actual "cases and controversies", traditional rules of standing prevent a third party who only has an ideological interest in a case from jumping in. Since California didn't want to appeal, and the traditional marriage group couldn't appeal after today's decision, the law reverts to the District Court's decision. Gay marriage is Constitutional, but only in California.

Warpy

(111,254 posts)
8. They couldn't find anything in the lower court's ruling against it
Wed Jun 26, 2013, 07:46 PM
Jun 2013

to pick at and unravel, so they punted it back to California, saying the people who appealed it to the Supreme Court had no legal standing to do so.

The lower court's ruling was nailed down tight. I'm surprised they chose to hear it, at all. It was ironclad.

It's about the best we could have expected from this corrupt and reactionary court.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What did the Supreme cour...