HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Rand Paul: "Humans Will M...

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 12:25 PM

Rand Paul: "Humans Will Marry Non Humans Without DOMA"

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul (R) on Wednesday worried the defeat of the Defense of Marriage Act could lead to the legalization of human-animal marriages.

“I think this is the conundrum and gets back to what you were saying in the opening — whether or not churches should decide this,” Paul said on Glenn Beck’s radio show Wednesday morning. “But it is difficult because if we have no laws on this people take it to one extension further. Does it have to be humans? You know, I mean. So there really are — the question is what social mores, can some social mores be part of legislation?”

“Historically, we did at the state legislative level, we did allow for some social mores to be part of it,” the Kentucky Republican continued. “Some of them were said to be for health reasons and otherwise, but I’m kind of with you, I see the thousands-of-year tradition of the nucleus of the family unit. I also see that economically, if you just look without any kind of moral periscope and you say, what is it that is the leading cause of poverty in our country? It’s having kids without marriage. The stability of the marriage unit is enormous and we should not just say oh we’re punting on it, marriage can be anything.”

Paul had previously said he opposed DOMA, a federal law that prohibited same-sex couples from receiving federal marriage rights and protections. However, he only opposed the law because it potentially gave the Supreme Court an opening to legalize same-sex marriages nationwide.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/06/26/rand-paul-same-sex-marriage-conundrum-leads-to-marrying-animals/


Once again proving he is the biggest dumbass in the Senate.

203 replies, 19985 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 203 replies Author Time Post
Reply Rand Paul: "Humans Will Marry Non Humans Without DOMA" (Original post)
Initech Jun 2013 OP
Democracyinkind Jun 2013 #1
Initech Jun 2013 #11
Democracyinkind Jun 2013 #12
leftstreet Jun 2013 #19
freeplessinseattle Jun 2013 #152
Fortinbras Armstrong Jun 2013 #189
kelliekat44 Jun 2013 #62
freshwest Jun 2013 #190
eridani Jun 2013 #165
trusty elf Jun 2013 #171
Democracyinkind Jun 2013 #172
faithnomore Jun 2013 #186
Half-Century Man Jun 2013 #2
LibertyLover Jun 2013 #4
Half-Century Man Jun 2013 #9
Xyzse Jun 2013 #24
Half-Century Man Jun 2013 #26
Xyzse Jun 2013 #31
Moonwalk Jun 2013 #127
Half-Century Man Jun 2013 #141
Brewinblue Jun 2013 #64
dixiegrrrrl Jun 2013 #14
Initech Jun 2013 #20
longship Jun 2013 #150
Half-Century Man Jun 2013 #159
freshwest Jun 2013 #191
Wait Wut Jun 2013 #3
Amonester Jun 2013 #138
dembotoz Jun 2013 #5
Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #6
Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #7
jmowreader Jun 2013 #155
fleur-de-lisa Jun 2013 #8
Politicalboi Jun 2013 #35
FarCenter Jun 2013 #56
nomorenomore08 Jun 2013 #199
fleur-de-lisa Jun 2013 #63
The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2013 #82
freeplessinseattle Jun 2013 #153
yellerpup Jun 2013 #10
Hekate Jun 2013 #36
yellerpup Jun 2013 #42
HardTimes99 Jun 2013 #45
RZM Jun 2013 #69
Dash87 Jun 2013 #13
REP Jun 2013 #15
IdaBriggs Jun 2013 #16
aquart Jun 2013 #103
Nanjing to Seoul Jun 2013 #143
IdaBriggs Jun 2013 #182
closeupready Jun 2013 #17
struggle4progress Jun 2013 #168
freshwest Jun 2013 #192
Ligyron Jun 2013 #18
LostOne4Ever Jun 2013 #161
Fortinbras Armstrong Jun 2013 #196
magellan Jun 2013 #21
ornotna Jun 2013 #174
Logical Jun 2013 #22
wtmusic Jun 2013 #23
baldguy Jun 2013 #25
wtmusic Jun 2013 #28
baldguy Jun 2013 #34
wtmusic Jun 2013 #40
baldguy Jun 2013 #41
wtmusic Jun 2013 #43
baldguy Jun 2013 #79
wtmusic Jun 2013 #88
baldguy Jun 2013 #94
iamthebandfanman Jun 2013 #184
wtmusic Jun 2013 #188
eridani Jun 2013 #167
leftstreet Jun 2013 #29
wtmusic Jun 2013 #30
Initech Jun 2013 #44
PDJane Jun 2013 #27
eridani Jun 2013 #166
PDJane Jun 2013 #187
alp227 Jun 2013 #32
Major Hogwash Jun 2013 #33
hunter Jun 2013 #37
Initech Jun 2013 #47
randome Jun 2013 #48
Buns_of_Fire Jun 2013 #38
Nanjing to Seoul Jun 2013 #144
janlyn Jun 2013 #39
OnionPatch Jun 2013 #65
janlyn Jun 2013 #68
freeplessinseattle Jun 2013 #156
UTUSN Jun 2013 #46
JDPriestly Jun 2013 #96
lunasun Jun 2013 #121
Wounded Bear Jun 2013 #49
ellie Jun 2013 #50
Nanjing to Seoul Jun 2013 #145
JHB Jun 2013 #179
kentauros Jun 2013 #51
Orsino Jun 2013 #52
Johonny Jun 2013 #53
KansDem Jun 2013 #54
Historic NY Jun 2013 #55
athenasatanjesus Jun 2013 #57
Sand Wind Jun 2013 #58
MineralMan Jun 2013 #59
npk Jun 2013 #60
Matariki Jun 2013 #61
haele Jun 2013 #66
The Wizard Jun 2013 #67
notadmblnd Jun 2013 #70
Spirochete Jun 2013 #71
Kurovski Jun 2013 #72
Sancho Jun 2013 #73
Initech Jun 2013 #75
felix_numinous Jun 2013 #74
SemperEadem Jun 2013 #76
kestrel91316 Jun 2013 #77
Demoiselle Jun 2013 #78
SDjack Jun 2013 #80
Javaman Jun 2013 #81
still_one Jun 2013 #83
dhill926 Jun 2013 #84
bl968 Jun 2013 #85
LiberalEsto Jun 2013 #90
Moonwalk Jun 2013 #140
tridim Jun 2013 #86
Posteritatis Jun 2013 #93
Tree-Hugger Jun 2013 #111
lunasun Jun 2013 #122
Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2013 #162
lunasun Jun 2013 #194
Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2013 #195
grattsl Jun 2013 #87
Beacool Jun 2013 #89
davidpdx Jun 2013 #113
Beacool Jun 2013 #120
Beacool Jun 2013 #132
Thor_MN Jun 2013 #91
Theyletmeeatcake2 Jun 2013 #92
JDPriestly Jun 2013 #95
H2O Man Jun 2013 #97
SoapBox Jun 2013 #98
valerief Jun 2013 #99
winter is coming Jun 2013 #100
Phlem Jun 2013 #101
DirkGently Jun 2013 #102
Initech Jun 2013 #129
tclambert Jun 2013 #104
SummerSnow Jun 2013 #105
truebluegreen Jun 2013 #106
totodeinhere Jun 2013 #107
SammyWinstonJack Jun 2013 #108
DesertFlower Jun 2013 #109
randome Jun 2013 #110
angrychair Jun 2013 #112
randome Jun 2013 #114
Arugula Latte Jun 2013 #136
davidpdx Jun 2013 #115
JHB Jun 2013 #175
MNBrewer Jun 2013 #116
fascisthunter Jun 2013 #117
displacedtexan Jun 2013 #118
undeterred Jun 2013 #119
Cha Jun 2013 #123
Ilsa Jun 2013 #124
freshwest Jun 2013 #193
Marie Marie Jun 2013 #125
eridani Jun 2013 #170
Turbineguy Jun 2013 #126
MotherPetrie Jun 2013 #128
AgingAmerican Jun 2013 #130
SunSeeker Jun 2013 #131
Arugula Latte Jun 2013 #133
Coyotl Jun 2013 #134
Beacool Jun 2013 #135
Lex Jun 2013 #137
samsingh Jun 2013 #139
Nanjing to Seoul Jun 2013 #142
backscatter712 Jun 2013 #146
Nanjing to Seoul Jun 2013 #147
backscatter712 Jun 2013 #148
Nanjing to Seoul Jun 2013 #149
patrice Jun 2013 #151
Revanchist Jun 2013 #154
Lil Missy Jun 2013 #157
customerserviceguy Jun 2013 #158
Fire Walk With Me Jun 2013 #160
blkmusclmachine Jun 2013 #163
eridani Jun 2013 #164
hobbit709 Jun 2013 #169
lbrtbell Jun 2013 #173
quaker bill Jun 2013 #176
maxcopper Jun 2013 #177
Enthusiast Jun 2013 #178
BenzoDia Jun 2013 #180
get the red out Jun 2013 #181
Grateful for Hope Jun 2013 #183
Jamaal510 Jun 2013 #185
Cleita Jun 2013 #197
Rhiannon12866 Jun 2013 #198
AnnieBW Jun 2013 #200
Bjorn Against Jun 2013 #201
WinkyDink Jun 2013 #202
Wolf Frankula Jun 2013 #203

Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 12:26 PM

1. They are so perverted.

Conservatives constantly muse about bestiality and about marrying vegetables.

Meanwhile, no gay, bisexual or liberal person that I ever met has ever concerned himself with such smut.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Democracyinkind (Reply #1)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 12:40 PM

11. I know, I always find it hilarious that they're the first ones to bring it up.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Reply #11)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 12:41 PM

12. Not just the first, but basically the only ones.


It's positively mindboggling.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Democracyinkind (Reply #12)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 12:59 PM

19. Remember Bush's 'human-animal hybrids' SOTU speech?

Tonight I ask you to pass legislation to prohibit the most egregious abuses of medical research: human cloning in all its forms; creating or implanting embryos for experiments; creating human-animal hybrids; and buying, selling or patenting human embryos.


That was so...weird LOL

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftstreet (Reply #19)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 01:52 AM

152. OMG, I almost forgot about that. Such a WTF? moment! n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Democracyinkind (Reply #12)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 12:44 PM

189. Well, it held them hide the fact that they don't have an actual argument against gay marriage

It's an example of the logical fallacies of The Red Herring and The Slippery Slope. That's two fallacies for the price of one!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Democracyinkind (Reply #1)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 03:15 PM

62. But somebody married him, didn't they? What's the diff? nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kelliekat44 (Reply #62)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 12:55 PM

190. Started my day off with a laugh, thanks!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Democracyinkind (Reply #1)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 05:31 AM

165. If cats and dogs and vegetables all have higher IQs than conservatives-

--maybe it makes sense to allow animals and vegetables to sign contracts with them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to trusty elf (Reply #171)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 06:10 AM

172. Wow.


I didn't know that I was literally telling the truth. Case in point, though, isn't it?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Democracyinkind (Reply #1)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 11:23 AM

186. Oh no...........You mean people will start marrying Republicans!!!!!

 

Oh, the humanity!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 12:27 PM

2. He has been waiting for this...

...He has been talking about it for years,. So , go young rand, find that special sheep.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Half-Century Man (Reply #2)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 12:29 PM

4. I hope Rand and his ewe

are very happy together. Baaaaaaa.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LibertyLover (Reply #4)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 12:39 PM

9. That's sexist..

It could be a ram. The defeat of DOMA opens a lot of doors. I just hope the sheep can see past his flaws (He looks to me like a sleep-drooler), and accept him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Half-Century Man (Reply #9)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:03 PM

24. A Ram?

He's liable to get poked...
Not in a good way...
-snork-

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Xyzse (Reply #24)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:06 PM

26. Rainbow colored world.

Poke or get poked...enjoy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Half-Century Man (Reply #26)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:13 PM

31. Cool beans

You're right, he might even enjoy it.
Didn't even think of that...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Half-Century Man (Reply #9)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:54 PM

127. A ram, huh? So you're saying that for Rand...

...there'll never be another ewe?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Moonwalk (Reply #127)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 11:16 PM

141. Ewe made me leave my happy home......

....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LibertyLover (Reply #4)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 03:17 PM

64. I love ewe.

Ewe loves me.
We're a happy family . . .


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Half-Century Man (Reply #2)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 12:53 PM

14. ewwwwwwwwww

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Half-Century Man (Reply #2)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:00 PM

20. He represents the tea party, which are sheep.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Half-Century Man (Reply #2)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 01:24 AM

150. And end up disgraced, on the street, in shabby clothes...

Leaning against a grimy brick wall drinking Woolite.














(Gene Wilder in Woody Allen's "Everything you wanted to know about sex"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to longship (Reply #150)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 02:47 AM

159. Aqualung

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Half-Century Man (Reply #159)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 01:11 PM

191. Or Aqua Buddha?

Last edited Fri Jun 28, 2013, 02:05 PM - Edit history (1)

Rand Paul’s debate interrupted by Aqua Buddha

The Kentucky Tea Partier and his Democratic opponent argue about Paul's college days and an old prank kidnapping


By Alex Pareene, October 18., 2010



Rand Paul’s debate last night with Democratic opponent Jack Conway turned very ugly. Conway has begun running ads that reference Paul’s now-infamous membership in a “secret” college group called the NoZe Brotherhood. The Brotherhood was dedicated to “blasphemy,” and they once staged a joke “kidnapping” of a female student, whom they “forced” to worship an idol they called the Aqua Buddha.

All the story shows is that in college, Rand Paul probably enjoyed smoking weed. (And he may not have taken his faith all that seriously.) The woman says the entire thing was “weird” but not especially threatening.*

So at his debate last night, Rand went off on Conway for referencing the incident. Paul went all-out on the aggrieved outrage. He accused Conway of “attacking a man’s religious beliefs to gain higher office.” He said Conway should be ashamed of himself...

“Why did he freely join a group known for mocking, for making fun of people with faith?” Conway asked during the debate. “When is it ever a good idea to tie up a woman and ask her to kneel before a false idol, your god, which you call Aqua Buddha?”


http://www.salon.com/2010/10/18/rand_paul_debate_aqua_buddha/

*Rand-holm Syndrome: “Kidnap” victim defends “THC Party” candidate

...“They never hurt me, they never did anything wrong,” the unnamed woman told GQ, “but the whole thing was kind of sadistic...”

Today, the Washington Post’s Greg Sargent got an exclusive with the woman, who totally vindicated Paul by saying she was never kidnapped! Except that her story did not change, at all — the facts of it are the same — she just doesn’t consider it a proper, illegal kidnapping.

The Paul campaign, obviously, was thrilled to see that false and salacious “kidnapping” story debunked, because words don’t mean anything anymore, which is how he was able to deny “illegally kidnapping” someone while never addressing the actual incident, and now claim that that nonexistent charge was “completely shot down” by a reiteration of what he actually did do.

Also, uh:

In our conversation, she elaborated that she doesn’t want her name in print because she’s a clinical psychologist who works with former members of the military, some of whom are Tea Partyers, and fears that complicating Paul’s Senate run could put her in danger.


http://www.salon.com/2010/08/11/rand_paul_kidnap_victim/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 12:29 PM

3. He should support that.

His mother married a non-human alien.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Wait Wut (Reply #3)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 11:13 PM

138. Here here (pic)


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 12:31 PM

5. maybe he might but i was not planning on it

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 12:31 PM

6. The bride/groom might have a problem with the "I do" part unless it's a parrot.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 12:33 PM

7. The mind boggles at the thought of wedding gifts. Scratching post? Doggie bowl?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tierra_y_Libertad (Reply #7)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 02:05 AM

155. Sheep shears

Y'know, Rand, most of us didn't go to the Neal Horsley School of Dating.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 12:33 PM

8. So can I marry my cat now? - n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fleur-de-lisa (Reply #8)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:20 PM

35. What are you waiting for

 

I married mine yesterday. Her name is Amity. She's into weed too.

<a href="http://imgur.com/L8zhoY6"><img src="" title="Hosted by imgur.com"/></a>

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Politicalboi (Reply #35)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 03:09 PM

56. Doesn't look to be over 18; did you get her parents' consent?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FarCenter (Reply #56)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 09:11 PM

199. In fairness, an 18-year-old cat would be pretty damn old. Eligible for Kitty Social Security.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Politicalboi (Reply #35)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 03:17 PM

63. Congrats!

On both your marriage and your green thumb!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fleur-de-lisa (Reply #8)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 04:28 PM

82. Can I marry my three cats?

Might as well throw in polygamy (polyfelinity?) while we're at it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The Velveteen Ocelot (Reply #82)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 01:54 AM

153. I vote, Yes! Then I can marry my 3 too!

I'm always telling them how in love with them I am.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 12:40 PM

10. I could never let Rand have the run of the farm.

I'm afraid he would cast sheep's eyes at all the livestock.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to yellerpup (Reply #10)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:23 PM

36. He knows that some animals are more equal than others

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hekate (Reply #36)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:48 PM

42. Equal or not, Rand finds them hot.

Otherwise, he wouldn't be so obsessed with beastiality.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hekate (Reply #36)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:52 PM

45. DUZY for sure! - nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hekate (Reply #36)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 03:38 PM

69. Didn't Liza Minnelli do that already? n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 12:46 PM

13. That entire family is full of fucking tools

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 12:54 PM

15. Well, someone did marry HIM

He's not human (and not just because he's a jackass).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 12:55 PM

16. We know jackasses (Republicans) are copulating with human females -

 

and they are marrying them, too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to IdaBriggs (Reply #16)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 08:09 PM

103. Uh, the jackass is the Democratic symbol.

I know, it doesn't seem right. Why do THEY get the noble elephant?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aquart (Reply #103)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 11:45 PM

143. fine, troglodytes are marrying human females and producing republicans

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aquart (Reply #103)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 09:28 AM

182. Urk - so much for that analogy! Lol!

 

I tried!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 12:56 PM

17. Yes - in fact, I find myself strangely attracted to my Tupperware.

 

Can't seem to leave home in the morning without it.

Now, I can MARRY it! Haha! Take THAT Christians!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to closeupready (Reply #17)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 05:53 AM

168. I'm personally raising purple cabbages as mail-order brides

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to struggle4progress (Reply #168)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 01:20 PM

192. I lust after trees. I'll give up being monogamous for this.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 12:58 PM

18. Wait, I thought he was a Libertarian

and hence, People are free to marry whatever the F they want, and gov is to stay out of their every business. Period.

Drugs, yes, Sheep no?

huh?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ligyron (Reply #18)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 02:59 AM

161. Exactly

But as im finding out with my right wing libertarian friend....they are libertarian in name only.

These people pay lip-service to liberty and rights, but their actual positions never match. Abortion, gay marriage, and so on? OH THOSE ARE STATES RIGHTS ISSUES. If the FUCKING hypocrites ACTUALLY GAVE ONE RATS ASS ABOUT LIBERTY they would fucking want all of this to be national. The Libertarian party and Rand and Ron Paul in particular are two faced SOBs who talk the talk but never walk the walk.

ALL THEY CARE ABOUT IS THEIR FUCKING MONEY and getting high. FUCK em. Real libertarians like the ACLU celebrated the ruling.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LostOne4Ever (Reply #161)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 04:28 PM

196. For many right-wing types

When they say "I believe in individual freedom," they actually mean "I believe in individual freedom, as long as I, personally, approve of what they are doing." In other words, they do not believe in individual freedom.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:00 PM

21. Because that happened before DOMA, right?

Where do they find these nitwits? Is there some ongoing "dumbass-for-congress" fire sale that only Repubs know about?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to magellan (Reply #21)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 06:54 AM

174. But only in America

I hear the rest of the world has a little bit more self control than us.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:01 PM

22. Is he saying I might marry a GOP supporter? n-t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:02 PM

23. And someone told me Snowden agrees with Paul!

What a narcissistic asshole.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to baldguy (Reply #25)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:09 PM

28. That proves it...Snowden hates gays.

Thanks for that, I'm going to send a bulk email with thousands of CCs about Snowden's REAL anti-gay agenda.

What's your email? I'll put you on the list.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to wtmusic (Reply #28)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:19 PM

34. Given that he's a RW libertarian douchebag, I wouldn't be surprised if Snowden was anti-gay.

 

He didn't have a big problem with the US govts surveillance programs until Obama got into office either. He was really pissed at the NYT for publishing leaks:

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/06/26/what-nsa-leaker-edward-snowden-said-four-years-ago-about-whistleblowers-might-surprise-you/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to baldguy (Reply #34)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:39 PM

40. I'm going to put all that stuff in the email.

This is great connecting-the-dots, character assassination stuff.

What's your email?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to wtmusic (Reply #40)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:44 PM

41. Love the fact that you have no clue about Snowdens objectives, but still support him anyway.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to baldguy (Reply #41)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:48 PM

43. His objectives are unimportant to me.

He undertook substantial risk to his own life to expose what is widely acknowledged as widespread government wrongdoing.

I don't care about his objectives, his glasses, his facial stubble, or his manner of speaking, or his past support for this candidate or that.

Incomprehensibly, his actions speak for themselves.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to wtmusic (Reply #43)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 04:08 PM

79. "... substantial risk to his own life..." So, Obama is activly trying to get him assasinated?

 

You're really far out on the deep end of RW libertarian lunacy, aren't you? This is Alex Jones territory.

And Snowden's actions do speak for themselves.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to baldguy (Reply #79)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 04:48 PM

88. No, you're naive.

Bye!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to wtmusic (Reply #88)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 06:15 PM

94. RIIIIIIIIGHT!

 

You think Barack Obama is targeting his enemies for assassination, and I'M being naive.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to wtmusic (Reply #43)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 10:34 AM

184. LMAO

way to list a bunch of nonsense in an attempt to downplay something..

you know damn well someones intent of doing an action is different than their facial features or looks.

he would have been a hero if he had kept his actions to whistleblowing.
unfortunately he might have let those foreign countries have a look at his laptop and info he had..
and im sorry but by definition that makes him a traitor and chargeable with treason.
he only is giving them more reason.

does that make spying on americans okay?
of course not.
but doesn't make him in the right for his latter actions if they turn out to be true.

its kind of the job of intelligence agencies to spy on other nations tho.. and giving said foreign nations classified info about that sort of thing is definitely a violation of law here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to iamthebandfanman (Reply #184)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 12:00 PM

188. "...someones intent of doing an action is different than their facial features or looks"

Maybe says more about your own experiences than Snowden, but whatever.

That's interesting, the definition of traitor is, "Maybe letting those foreign countries have a look your laptop..."

That's one of the most ignorant statements I've read here.

Sorry you're so afraid.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to baldguy (Reply #34)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 05:50 AM

167. I get it now. Whether or not I think our national security state is a good idea--

--really ought to depend only on whether or not Snowden is a nice guy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to wtmusic (Reply #23)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:09 PM

29. OMG! Was Snowden's ex actually a 'stuffed animal' ballerina?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftstreet (Reply #29)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:12 PM

30. A "stuffed animal pole dancer" is probably more accurate.

According to Google, they're a rare breed:

No results found for "stuffed animal pole dancer".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to wtmusic (Reply #30)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:50 PM

44. Not sure I'd want to see the safe search turned off on this one.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:07 PM

27. That hasn't proven the case in Canada.

Or, for that matter, anywhere else that gay marriage is legal.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PDJane (Reply #27)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 05:41 AM

166. But what about mooses?

I've heard that they fall in love with Canadian cows.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to eridani (Reply #166)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 11:41 AM

187. Frankly, inter-species matings aren't my problem, either.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:15 PM

32. Hey Medea Benjamin do u still STAND WITH RAND?

Libertarianism: freedom unless you are non white, a woman, gay, or poor.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:16 PM

33. Too late! Sister Sarah has already married and replicated several drone clones.

We are doomed!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:28 PM

37. What's going on inside Rand Paul's brain, translated... (May be NSFW)


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hunter (Reply #37)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:55 PM

47. I was thinking this:



Or this:



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hunter (Reply #37)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:57 PM

48. That's disgusting! And funny! And weird!

 


[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font]
[hr]

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:28 PM

38. Maybe, but I've yet to find a cow that REALLY understands me.

Ah, there was this one many years ago, but she left me for a permanent position at Armour Packing Company. I wonder whatever happened to her?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buns_of_Fire (Reply #38)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 11:49 PM

144. Cows are such bullheaded creatures.

 

Meerkats. . .now there's love and understanding.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:39 PM

39. Wait, what ???

The leading cause of poverty in this country is people having children out of wedlock???? WTF!!!! So by his own reasoning people being married would lessen poverty? The dumb ass doesn't even get that there is a contradiction, typical conservative suffering from cognitive dissonance! !

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to janlyn (Reply #39)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 03:18 PM

65. The leading cause of poverty

Is the fact that we, as a nation, believe morals don't apply to business practices, hence it's A-ok not to pay a living wage.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to OnionPatch (Reply #65)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 03:32 PM

68. +10000

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to janlyn (Reply #39)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 02:06 AM

156. Exactly what I was thinking! Just mind-boggling n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:52 PM

46. Gone shopping for a bridal gown now:

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to UTUSN (Reply #46)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 06:43 PM

96. +10000

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to UTUSN (Reply #46)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 09:52 PM

121. And they call it puppy love............


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 02:00 PM

49. Well, will those 'non-humans' be taxpayers?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 02:01 PM

50. I just wanted to take this opportunity to say

FUCK RAND PAUL.

That is all.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ellie (Reply #50)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 11:50 PM

145. Not with a stolen dick

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ellie (Reply #50)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 07:38 AM

179. He thinks that without DOMA you'll make it a threesome...

...with the horse he rode in on.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 02:03 PM

51. Does this mean we can legally start combining various animal DNA with human DNA,

and I can finally have my centaur mate?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 02:08 PM

52. He's just checking. Asking for a friend.

And he never specifically mentioned goats, so get that thought out of your heads.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 02:08 PM

53. You know what the leading cause of poverty is in this country, elitist selfish bastards like Rand

Wouldn't a libertarian not like Government in his marriage? Hmm.....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 02:46 PM

54. Beg your pardon? I have no desire to marry a Republican!

(no text)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 03:04 PM

55. I guess Aqua Buddha will perform the ceremony, right Rand.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 03:10 PM

57. Great!,now I just need to find a Vulcan,or an Elf to marry and I'll be happy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 03:11 PM

58. Lol, nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 03:11 PM

59. This Paul statement calls out for satire.

I'm going to leave that to someone else, though.

And fuck Ron Paul and his little Rand Paul, too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 03:12 PM

60. Rand Paul is a classless, idiotic loser.

Please tell me his time in the Senate will be short lived.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 03:13 PM

61. In his part of the country perhaps...

or in his imagination, late at night, alone.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 03:20 PM

66. Isn't a legal marriage a contract that needs to be signed and witnessed?

I can see joke marriages where someone prints up a certificate saying they married their dog or box turtle, but ain't no way a county clerk who's job depends on taxpayer dollars is going to accept a pawprint on an official, noterized state document...

As for the IRS accepting John and Fluffy (with no social security number or official birth certificate) Smith as "married" for tax purposes due to no DOMA? Did it ever happen before DOMA in the 200+ years of United States history?

Gimme a break.


Haele

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 03:29 PM

67. Kim Jong Paul

is headed for the rubber room. And his father should have used better rubbers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 03:42 PM

70. Well he would know,wouldn't he

or is he still single?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 03:44 PM

71. Only in a forced choice

between an animal and a republican.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 03:45 PM

72. If this is all that prickwit has as argument against Teh Gay, I ain't worried.

If Rand Paul thinks repealing The Defense of Marriage Act will lead to humans marrying non-humans, he's not doing much thinking at all.

He's a racist, bigoted little troll, just like his papa-doodle.

Everybody knows it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 03:53 PM

73. I corporations are people, why not marry a turnip???

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sancho (Reply #73)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 04:00 PM

75. Only if I can marry InBev!

I'll have billions and all the free beer I could drink!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 03:53 PM

74. How can anyone hallucinate

this man has followers around here? What a lame meme.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 04:02 PM

76. but according to you and your dad's ideology, they should be free to do whatever they want

including marrying non humans... it should be none of the government's business.

see, he's a lying asshole--he's for government that's big enough to enforce his point of view on everyone else--and that's a pretty big government.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 04:04 PM

77. I swear these people all think Americans have IQs of about 15.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 04:06 PM

78. As a Pennsylvanian, I'm proud he's taking up Sen. Man-on-Dog Santorum's cause.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 04:21 PM

80. Waiting for Republican to marry a corporation. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 04:29 PM

83. rand paul may call himself a libertarian, but he is not. He is just another repuke bigot

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 04:32 PM

84. I'm infatuated by my new office chair......

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 04:46 PM

85. Contracts

A marriage is a contract, and legally you can't enter into a contract unless you are capable of understanding the terms of the contract. Non-humans will not be able to do so, and will not be able to sign the marriage license, and thus would always be unable to get married.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to bl968 (Reply #85)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 05:21 PM

90. They must also be able to SIGN contracts

 

Some critters are smart, but I have yet to see a dog or a cat picking up a pen and signing its name on the dotted line.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LiberalEsto (Reply #90)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 11:16 PM

140. You've yet to see a dog or cat picking up a pen? You have obviously...

...never met my cat.

Nor this cat:

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 04:48 PM

86. Posted on FB today...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tridim (Reply #86)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 06:08 PM

93. Okay, I didn't expect the lower right one. (nt)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tridim (Reply #86)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 09:16 PM

111. Holy crap!

Look at the size of that grasshopper or whatever bug is sucking face with the dude. That is freaky!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tridim (Reply #86)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 09:56 PM

122. Duck goat love!!


is that a goat?
why a duck?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lunasun (Reply #122)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 03:32 AM

162. "why a duck?"

 

Marxist!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Spitfire of ATJ (Reply #162)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 02:28 PM

194. yes a Marxist question + pic =

insight in to what will come with no DOMA!!!

(oh how I wish they were around to add humor to all the silliness going on nowdays)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lunasun (Reply #194)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 03:34 PM

195. It's a slippery slope leading to communication by horn.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 04:48 PM

87. And I thought Rand was already married to a human!?!?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 04:51 PM

89. He must know.

His father must have mated with a poodle, considering that curly mop growing on top of Randy's head.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Beacool (Reply #89)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 09:20 PM

113. Oh owch

That was good..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to davidpdx (Reply #113)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 09:49 PM

120. Except, that it is an insult to poodles.

They are cuter and nicer than crazy Randy.

Also, poodles have better haircuts.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Beacool (Reply #89)


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 05:30 PM

91. Rand is having an affair with whatever it is on top of his head, so

 

now he is free to leave his marriage and settle down with the (rodent?)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 05:57 PM

92. I don't see a problem

As long as there are 2 consenting parties and they can both say " I do" .Oops I've opened the gates to people with talking birds.....There's an Australian politician named Bernardi who seems to think that gay marriage will lead to bestiality as well....we wonder WTF!!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 06:37 PM

95. Rand Paul needs to read the 14th Amendment.

U.S. Constitution

. . . .
Amendment XIV
Section 1.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxiv

I suppose a human could marry a corporation since the same Supreme Court that declared corporations to be persons with constitutional rights decided that DOMA was unconstitutional.

But corporations have been marrying without regard for gender for years now. They just call their marriages mergers and takeovers.

Ron Paul has just shown how stupid he really is. Oh, dear. How did he get through medical school much less into the Senate. It's unbelievable.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 06:44 PM

97. I actually have to agree.

Call me old-fashioned, and even conservative if you must, but as the father of two boys and two girls, I'm not able to think of human beings marrying republicans. Species marrying other species could be a dangerous thing.

As far as marriage equality among human beings, I am absolutely for it. I am not huge on thanking politicians for doing the correct thing, and so I think the recent USSC ruling is positive, but would prefer that it allows those whom were denied human rights be able to sue for damages. And I'm not joking about that. Where the fuck do the shitheads like Rand Paul get off, denying people the right to participate fully in our society? I think that they should pay, and not just on election day.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 06:47 PM

98. STFU you POS Jag-Off.

What a worthless crazy piece of dung.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 07:41 PM

99. But it's already been done. Lynn Cheney married Dick. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 07:48 PM

100. Yeah, because law is the only thing that's been stopping humans from marrying nonhumans.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 07:52 PM

101. Oh FFS

Will someone slap him in the face already.

-p

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 07:55 PM

102. Time for Santorum to dig out all his "Man on Dog" nutwaddery again.


These guys spend a LOT of time thinking about bestiality.

Just saying.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DirkGently (Reply #102)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:59 PM

129. Don't forget John "Man-On-Box-Turtle" Cornyn.

Or Bryan "polygamy" Fischer. These freaks are a dime a dozen.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 08:10 PM

104. Well, some space aliens are kinda purty.

Yessir, some men just might wanna get them some of that space alien poon tang.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 08:40 PM

105. What the hell is he talking about??!!

So damn perverted

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 08:48 PM

106. You know how the worst anti-gay zealots always seem to be

 

closeted self-hating gays? So that, for them, allowing same-sex marriage really does threaten their own marriages?

Maybe alleged Senator Rand Paul is secretly attracted to pigs, or hyenas? Or snakes!....actually, I can't think of any creatures more loathsome than alleged Senator Rand Paul.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 08:56 PM

107. This just goes to show that Rand Paul is a fraud. He claims to be a libertarian.

But true libertarians, while I disagree with them on many issues, have been in the forefront of opposing government intrusions into social issues such as gay marriage. It would be a true libertarian's view that if two people of the same gender want to marry each other that is nobody's business but their own. Rand Paul is an opportunistic politician and certainty not a libertarian.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 08:58 PM

108. Embarrassingly stupid.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 09:06 PM

109. a few months ago bill maher commented

about this. he said (paraphrasing) "what is it with these people and animals? hey that goat looks good to me".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 09:08 PM

110. Wow. I didn't know non-humans HAD their own DOMA.

 

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font]
[hr]

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 09:18 PM

112. for not kicking the Christ baby

Of all the bullshit that gets slung by these slack-jawed asshats this is the one that convinces me that the best part of their parental DNA slide out the back end of their daddy's sister. Why the fuck do these monkey dildos get a pass for saying the most ignorant, bigoted, misogynist and bat-shit crazy carrying a cowbell statements and the press gives them a pass. The general public gives them a pass. Despite caring so much about the subject, the phrase "two consenting adults" -human implied-is not hard to understand. If you don't get it than you should get Tommy-Boyed "raise your hand so Tommy can come over to your seat and hit you in the head with a tack-hammer because you are a Republican" (the last word has been altered out of respect for our mentally-challenged bothers and sisters).
I have no desire to gain a hint of insight into the websites or blogs you have on your favorites Goathummer243. What we have here isn't a "cry" for help, its a hysterical, holy shit, 3-year old in the middle of the toy isle meltdown on free tickle me Elmo day. So, if you ever find yourself with a overwhelming desire to play with your poodle's pee-pee or toss the salad of your best friend's Emu, my advice to you is to punch yourself in the genitals until those thoughts pass. Rinse. Repeat if needed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to angrychair (Reply #112)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 09:20 PM

114. Inventively phrased!

 


[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font]
[hr]

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to angrychair (Reply #112)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 11:10 PM

136. Wasn't "Best Friend's Emu" a song by the Cars in the 80s?

 

Or maybe I'm thinking of "Jesse's Emu" by Rick Springfield.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 09:21 PM

115. He should marry a pig

It would suit him well.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to davidpdx (Reply #115)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 06:56 AM

175. Stacy's cochon has got it goin' on...



To the tune of...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 09:22 PM

116. Is this an Onion article?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 09:23 PM

117. Nazis shared this malformed thinking process

 

different time, same mental illness.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 09:32 PM

118. What he said v what he wants...

He wants morons to send him money. He doesn't believe any of this "Dogs and cats living together. Mass hysteria" crap he's spewing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 09:33 PM

119. Non-humans don't want to marry.

I'm watching "Species" tonight.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:09 PM

123. Rand Paul is such an ignorant asshole and so's that "dreamy"

father of his.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:15 PM

124. They really don't understand terms like legal capacity and

Informed consent, do they?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ilsa (Reply #124)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 01:33 PM

193. They already see half the human race in that group, so I'd say they misunderstood a lot.

Last edited Fri Jun 28, 2013, 02:07 PM - Edit history (1)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:35 PM

125. Finally, I can have my pony and marry it too.

It's a good day.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Marie Marie (Reply #125)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 06:04 AM

170. Such low standards!

I insist on a unicorn that farts rainbows myself.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:45 PM

126. Well,

some of those humans elected him. He might just be right.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:57 PM

128. So the lack of DOMA is why his own wife married a horse's ass?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 11:00 PM

130. I thought he was a leading Libertarian?

 

Sure sounds like a Republican to me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 11:01 PM

131. Why are you complaining, Rand? Now you can finally marry Aqua Buddha.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 11:03 PM

133. Marriage with a Non-Human has already happened many times in the past. Look at the Romneys.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 11:03 PM

134. Let me guess, the Vulcans?

 

LMAO

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 11:05 PM

135. Rand Paul bestiality comment 'sarcasm,' office says.

"This is a conundrum, and it gets back to what you were saying …whether or not churches should decide this," Paul said. "And it is difficult, because if we have no laws on this, people take it to one extension further. Does it have to be humans?"

That remark, his office said, wasn't meant to be taken seriously.

"Sarcasm sometimes doesn't translate adequately from radio conversation," his communications director Moira Bagley said. "Sen. Paul did not suggest that striking down DOMA could lead to unusual marriage arrangements. What he was discussing was that having the state recognize marriage without definition could lead to marriages with no basis in reality."

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/06/27/rand-paul-bestiality-comment-sarcasm-office-says/

Yeah, it was sarcasm........

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 11:11 PM

137. He thinks about weird sexual things

a lot it seems like.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 11:15 PM

139. if that's his only problem, easy solution

doma = man-man, man-woman, woman-woman

minimum age can be included as well

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 11:41 PM

142. Paulbots piss me off. Especially DU Paulbots. They support shit like this

 

Libertarian my ass!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nanjing to Seoul (Reply #142)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 12:08 AM

146. Why don't you name names.

You're throwing the accusations out. Who's supporting Rand Paul?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to backscatter712 (Reply #146)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 12:12 AM

147. Go to any Paul discussion. I am in no mood to go through DU thread by thread

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nanjing to Seoul (Reply #147)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 12:15 AM

148. No, you threw the accusation. Name names. I'm not doing your work for you. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to backscatter712 (Reply #148)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 12:28 AM

149. Again, I have a life and a wife that loves me and wants to spend time with me.

 

When I feel like it, I will. Right now, I'd rather wipe my ass than go through thread-by-thread looking shit up.

I've dealt personally with Paulbots and, at a greatest extent, Gundamentalists here. I normally put them on full ignore and forget they exist.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nanjing to Seoul (Reply #142)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 01:32 AM

151. While it is true that general public perception of Paul support does not differentiate issues, so

there is synergy as you suggest in the commercial media-sphere and amongst simple-minded media consumers, here at the DU we are making an effort not to stereotype individuals, even if we disagree with them, so what you said has less relevance here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 02:04 AM

154. It's too late, we're all doooooooomed!!!!!!!!!!!!!









?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328467361039




Just type man marries... into a google search and see what pops up

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 02:16 AM

157. That explains my sudden urge to screw small animals. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 02:20 AM

158. Playing to the fundies

Fundies normally don't warm up to libertarians, because their orientation is command-and-control, and libertarianism challenges that notion. However, Paul knows that his only shot is to win the nomination in 2016, when Rethugs with better pedigrees will have the sense to stay out of Hillary's way, and then hope she stumbles before reaching the finish line.

Sucking up to the snake handlers needs to be done to accomplish this. Right now, they're very, very disturbed about this ruling, and he's moved quickly to assure them that he's on their side.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 02:55 AM

160. He's obviously thinking about something in particular. A lot. n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 05:14 AM

163. NUTZ

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 05:22 AM

164. So he represents a state full of jackasses who allow animals to sign contracts?

Interesting. Feeling sorry for all the intelligent DU posters from Kentucky right about now.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 06:03 AM

169. That explains HIS ancestry.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 06:41 AM

173. A human has already married an animal

Rand Paul's wife married an animal.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 07:01 AM

176. As a "libertarian" Paul should know

That if people are going to do it, whatever it is, they will do it with or without government assistance / interference.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 07:03 AM

177. humans will marry Non Humans without DOMA

Good job done

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 07:36 AM

178. Gee, Rand, how did we ever get by before DOMA?

Fucking idiot.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 07:41 AM

180. Good bye, Paul! You silly, silly man.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 09:04 AM

181. Already have

The evidence is that a woman is married to Rand Paul, whatever he is.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 10:31 AM

183. This is absolutely ridiculous.

I can't believe this man was actually elected.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 10:56 AM

185. That's weird...I don't feel the urge to marry my Nintendo DS, though.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 04:34 PM

197. We need to send these guys to the cyber sanitarium for bat shit crazy public figures,

whether they are in media or politics. Right now, off the top of my head I would send Glenn Beck and Michele Bachmann to keep him company. They do not deserve one iota of our respect for their opinions because their opinions are bat shit crazy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cleita (Reply #197)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 06:36 PM

198. Too bad Reagan shut down the institutions

So they ended up in Congress. Who voted for these nut jobs?!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 09:14 PM

200. Forget Marrying my Cats...

I want to claim them as dependents!

Honestly, what a dumbass.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 09:31 PM

201. Sounds like Rand is training his pet goat to sign a marriage license

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 09:39 PM

202. My Sock Monkey Tim is very happy to learn this!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Initech (Original post)

Fri Jun 28, 2013, 10:21 PM

203. Just So Long as I Don't Have to Marry Randroid Paul

And Trump T. Trump's mother married an orangutan.

Wolf

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread