Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
Wed Feb 15, 2012, 08:06 PM Feb 2012

Payroll Tax Deal Would Allow Drug Testing, Reduce Unemployment Benefits To 73 Weeks


SNIP

A GOP aide said the deal would overturn a federal law that prevents states from screening and then drug testing people who apply for unemployment insurance. States would be permitted to screen claimants who lost their jobs because they failed or refused a drug test and people seeking new jobs that generally require drug tests. According to a 2006 survey cited by Republicans, 84 percent of employers required new hires to pass a drug test. Federal law currently does not allow states to deny benefits for reasons other than misconduct, fraud or disqualifying earnings.

"I'm glad that it's in there," Rep. Jack Kingston (R-Ga.) told HuffPost in an interview. Kingston was the first Republican in Congress last year to propose drug testing for those collecting unemployment. "I think that it will be a helpful tool for states."

SNIP

Democrats cautioned Wednesday morning that no deal has been finalized.

SNIP

Full article here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/15/unemployment-insurance-unemployment_n_1279415.html


4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Payroll Tax Deal Would Allow Drug Testing, Reduce Unemployment Benefits To 73 Weeks (Original Post) Tx4obama Feb 2012 OP
Are they going to exempt Politicalboi Feb 2012 #1
If the job "generally requires a drug test" customerserviceguy Feb 2012 #3
Not needed. Drug use on the job should fall under misconduct notadmblnd Feb 2012 #2
I hope the requirement to piss on a drug test extends to lawmakers. Denver Donkeys Feb 2012 #4

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
3. If the job "generally requires a drug test"
Wed Feb 15, 2012, 10:02 PM
Feb 2012

and you're a medical marijuana user, then, yes. If the job is driving a bus, then I want medical marijuana users excluded, too.

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
2. Not needed. Drug use on the job should fall under misconduct
Wed Feb 15, 2012, 08:18 PM
Feb 2012

and every one has to state reason for losing job such as lack of work, quit, fired. Most employers will fight paying unemployment if they have a valid reason for terminating employment anyway. It is then that the unemployment office will decide if benefits are payable. If it was found that the reason for the termination was drug use, benefits could be denied. Therefore there is no need for drug testing. Besides, who is going to pay for it?

 

Denver Donkeys

(39 posts)
4. I hope the requirement to piss on a drug test extends to lawmakers.
Wed Feb 15, 2012, 10:09 PM
Feb 2012

No-one is above the law.

Remember the fatal words of Tom "Squashed Bug" Delay (R-Bugville): "I AM THE GOVERNMENT!".

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Payroll Tax Deal Would Al...