Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Northerner

(5,040 posts)
Thu Feb 16, 2012, 05:19 PM Feb 2012

Intel: Iran not likely to attack if not provoked

Iran is not likely to attack the United States abroad or domestically if it is not provoked, according to a top military intelligence official.

Lt. Gen. Ronald Burgess, director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, told senators on Thursday that Iran is prepared to retaliate against the United States and its allies in the Middle East if it is attacked, but is unlikely to do so if not provoked.

“Iran can close the Strait of Hormuz — at least temporarily — and may launch missiles against United States forces and our allies in the region if it is attacked,” Burgess said in testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee.

“Iran could also attempt to employ terrorist surrogates worldwide — however, the agency assesses [that] Iran is unlikely to initiate or intentionally provoke a conflict.”

Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/defcon-hill/policy-and-strategy/211123-iran-not-likely-to-attack-if-not-provoked

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Intel: Iran not likely to attack if not provoked (Original Post) The Northerner Feb 2012 OP
Same thing was said about Iraq surfdog Feb 2012 #1
Iraq didn't have a military or an air force worth a damn. Iran does. truebrit71 Feb 2012 #2
The trouble is, that's exactly what I see happening. Sure hope that the US is smart enough to teddy51 Feb 2012 #3
Yup...me too... truebrit71 Feb 2012 #6
Bullying is a big problem. Ghost Dog Feb 2012 #4
Posted by mistake? truebrit71 Feb 2012 #7
Nope. Ghost Dog Feb 2012 #15
What makes you think a nuclear-armed Iran wouldn't be a bully RZM Feb 2012 #8
Exactly... WCGreen Feb 2012 #10
Next: Operation Poke the Bear gratuitous Feb 2012 #5
Whom do you think is President right now? nt Dreamer Tatum Feb 2012 #9
From what I've seen . . . gratuitous Feb 2012 #12
And these "political realities" will ensure that our choices remain limited in this way woo me with science Feb 2012 #13
There's the rub Cali_Democrat Feb 2012 #11
Indeed. woo me with science Feb 2012 #14
No one is likely to attack if unprovoked. Problem is, the definitions of 'provoked' vary stevenleser Feb 2012 #16
Duh? LadyHawkAZ Feb 2012 #17
 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
2. Iraq didn't have a military or an air force worth a damn. Iran does.
Thu Feb 16, 2012, 05:33 PM
Feb 2012

No way Iran attacks anyone first as they know that doing so would unleash hell on earth...the only way this gets started is if Nutty-Yahoo decides he's going to strike first and hope that his American Sugar Daddy has his back...

 

teddy51

(3,491 posts)
3. The trouble is, that's exactly what I see happening. Sure hope that the US is smart enough to
Thu Feb 16, 2012, 05:36 PM
Feb 2012

not have Netanyahu's back.

 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
4. Bullying is a big problem.
Thu Feb 16, 2012, 05:44 PM
Feb 2012

Bullying is a big problem. It can make kids feel hurt, scared, sick, lonely, embarrassed and sad. Bullies might hit, kick, or push to hurt people, or use words to call names, threaten, tease, or scare them.

A bully might say mean things about someone, grab a kid's stuff, make fun of someone, or leave a kid out of the group on purpose.

Some bullies threaten people or try to make them do things they don't want to do...

... Some bullies are looking for attention. They might think bullying is a way to be popular or to get what they want. Most bullies are trying to make themselves feel more important. When they pick on someone else, it can make them feel big and powerful...

/... http://kidshealth.org/kid/feeling/emotion/bullies.html

... Okay, so there you are, and someone is bullying you. What do you do "in the moment"?

- Ignore the bully. Pretend you didn't hear him. Don't even look at him. Walk right past him if you can.
- Don't cry, get angry, or show that you're upset. That's the bully's goal. Don't give her the satisfaction. Even if you're feeling really hurt, don't let it show. You can talk about or write down your reactions later.
- Respond to the bully evenly and firmly. Example: "No." "That's what you think."
- If you can, turn a comment into a joke. Example: The bully says, "Stupid outfit!" You say: "Thanks! I'm glad you noticed."
- Turn and walk away, or run if you have to. Remove yourself from the situation. Go to a place where an adult is present.
- Remember that you are not the one with the problem. It's the bully who has the problem...

/... http://pbskids.org/itsmylife/friends/bullies/article4.html

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
8. What makes you think a nuclear-armed Iran wouldn't be a bully
Thu Feb 16, 2012, 05:56 PM
Feb 2012

I think their desire for the bomb is twofold:

1) To deter aggression, notably American and Israeli aggression.

2) To have leverage over the non-nuclear Sunni Arab states in the region.

You hear a lot about the first, but not so much about the second. A common mistake people make is to fail to appreciate the perspectives other countries see the world from. While Americans (and others) may view Iran as a middling power at best, I don't think many Iranians (especially in the leadership) see it that way. Many probably see their country's rightful place as that of a great power. The bomb is one means of achieving that status.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
5. Next: Operation Poke the Bear
Thu Feb 16, 2012, 05:48 PM
Feb 2012

If Iran isn't going to provide us a casus belli, we'll just have to force them to do so. And, as we've seen in the past (Gulf of Tonkin anent Vietnam, World Trade Center anent Iraq), the United States will institute military action based on anything or even nothing.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
12. From what I've seen . . .
Thu Feb 16, 2012, 06:38 PM
Feb 2012

A person who revels in extra-judicial executions of persons domestically and abroad, who continues to hold prisoners incommunicado without counsel or charge, and who isn't terribly respectful of the Bill of Rights.

All in the name of expediency and "protecting" the United States, of course. Oh, and because of political realities that he doesn't dare disturb.

I'd prefer someone who takes his oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution a little more seriously. Unfortunately, none of the current crop of political Lilliputians in a position to win office in 2012 qualifies, so we're stuck with the best of a bad lot.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
13. And these "political realities" will ensure that our choices remain limited in this way
Thu Feb 16, 2012, 06:46 PM
Feb 2012

until we get the corporate money out of our political system. '

Good post.

Occupy.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
11. There's the rub
Thu Feb 16, 2012, 06:00 PM
Feb 2012

They WILL be provoked by Israel and/or the US. It started with the flying of drones over their territory and the assassination of Iranian scientists on Iranian soil.

Iran has shown tremendous restraint thus far.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
16. No one is likely to attack if unprovoked. Problem is, the definitions of 'provoked' vary
Thu Feb 16, 2012, 07:00 PM
Feb 2012

That is really where the issue is.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Intel: Iran not likely to...