Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
Mon Jul 29, 2013, 11:24 AM Jul 2013

More Independence for the FISA Court (Changing How Judges Chosen)

More Independence for the FISA Court
By THE EDITORIAL BOARD
Published: July 28, 2013

All 11 of the current members were assigned to the court by Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. In the nearly eight years he has been making his selections, Chief Justice Roberts has leaned about as far right as it is possible to go. Ten of those 11 members were appointed to the bench by Republican presidents; the two previous chief justices put Republican-appointed judges on the court 66 percent of the time, as reported by Charlie Savage in The Times.

snip

If the surveillance court is to be considered part of the American justice system, it needs to start looking more like an actual court. For starters, there is no good reason the chief justice should have sole authority to appoint the court’s judges. Already, critics of the current system have floated numerous alternative ways for selecting FISA court judges.

One idea worth considering, offered by Senator Richard Blumenthal, Democrat of Connecticut, is for each of the chief judges of the federal appeals courts to select one judge for the surveillance court.

This approach could minimize the risk of politicizing the process. A further step might be to require the chief judges’ choices to be submitted for approval to a board consisting of members of Congress with experience in intelligence matters and experts with experience in protecting civil liberties.

The professional qualifications of the judges appointed by Chief Justice Roberts are not in question. But given the extent to which the FISA court’s rulings have infiltrated our lives, it is appropriate for the public to have a voice in who sits on it.

The authority of our judiciary derives from its independence and its accountability. At the very least, the power to select the judges who are making secret law should not rest in the hands of one man.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/29/opinion/more-independence-for-the-fisa-court.html

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Lint Head

(15,064 posts)
1. I want to know "why" we have judges who are making secret law.
Mon Jul 29, 2013, 11:33 AM
Jul 2013

Secret law? Why are they secret? Are they secret because they are wrong? Immoral? Unethical? Unconstitutional? My opinion. Fuck "any" secret laws. Laws are to be "known" and adhered to. Not secret.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
2. Its a good thing that a whistleblower brought this to the public's attention.
Mon Jul 29, 2013, 11:36 AM
Jul 2013

Too bad he's being crucified for doing the right thing though.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
3. So the only comment you choose to make about changes to FISA court is about S.?
Mon Jul 29, 2013, 11:40 AM
Jul 2013

Very telling.

It says a lot about someone who would do that.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
5. So you self-identify with Nelson… the school bully. Glad you're willing to go public with that.
Mon Jul 29, 2013, 11:51 AM
Jul 2013
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»More Independence for the...