General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Heartbreaking Story Of A Harmless Deadhead Sentenced To Die In Prison
http://www.businessinsider.com/timothy-tylers-mandatory-minimum-sentence--life-in-prison-2013-7Timothy Tyler's sister took this picture in her West Hartford, Conn. apartment when he was a teenager, around the time he went to his first Grateful Dead show.
Timothy Tyler was 25 when he was sentenced to die in prison.
Tyler, a Grateful Dead fan with no history of violence, got life without the possibility of parole for selling LSD to a police informant.
He'd never gone to prison before.
But a judge was forced to give him life because of two prior drug convictions even though both those convictions resulted in probation.
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/timothy-tylers-mandatory-minimum-sentence--life-in-prison-2013-7#ixzz2aSC3ie3C
brooklynite
(94,595 posts)...and why is he "harmless"?
I don't support "Three Strikes", but I'm not overly sympathetic to drug dealers.
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Whereas most establishments that sell harmful drugs like alcohol and tobacco are grossly rewarded with profits
Drug dealer? He was selling enlightenment. Who fuckn cares?
Cronus Protagonist
(15,574 posts)I would place it below mushrooms.
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)And I'm not sure about that. Maybe if I did shrooms as much as cannabis I could subjectively compare, but psilocybin is more like a twice a year kind of thing. In any case, this study also doesn't look at the health benefits (both of these substances have plenty).
DonRedwood
(4,359 posts)Cheap student loans to help a kid get a career is a much better investment in our youth...
just saying.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I hate mandatory sentencing laws in general, but there's a very easy way to avoid going to jail for selling drugs, too.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)How hard is it to not stand naked out on the highway trying to build a dam in the dirt? He did that, too.
There just has to be a better way to deal with this case than to put a nonviolent 25-year-old away for life with no possibility of parole.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)It tips them off the subject is white.
reusrename
(1,716 posts)I would rather see it work the other way 'round, where connected dealers were rounded up while independents were allowed to prosper.
They can start with the Bush crime family and their heroin enterprise.
I guess you could say I'm not sympathetic to organized crime. It's probably easier to just look the other way and then you can blame the victims instead of the oppressors.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)to the crowds and got busted in Connecticut...
According to him it cost all his meager possessions plus the $45 grand in profits he'd made on the tour, but he was able to bribe the prosecutor into a much lesser charge and only a few months jail time...
closeupready
(29,503 posts)I'd not be real interested in hearing about him.
But since his crime was non-violent, I can't support a life sentence for this.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Catherina
(35,568 posts)n2doc
(47,953 posts)kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)system that the RWingers in Congress and state legislatures vote for.
ET Awful
(24,753 posts)Both of them sentenced under absurd "carrier weight" laws.
What this basically did was allow sentencing to occur not on the actual amount of LSD being sold, but on the medium it was distributed on.
For example, you could be sentenced to 5 years for having 300 grams of LSD and an additional 10-15 years for having that LSD embedded in 500 grams of paper.
Or, put another way, if you had 1,000 doses of LSD on paper, you would do 3 times as long a prison term as if you had the same number of doses in liquid form.
Drug law and policy in this country has been and continues to be absurd.
busterbrown
(8,515 posts)Abused and still an animal lover.. This just can not be true.. Its heartbreaking...
Isnt there an organization to help this kid? I would participate!. It could be anyones child.. People just dont give a shit until it happens to one of their own...This is so American these days...
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)prohibitionists, especially by using government criminal codes, do enjoy inflicting pain on others. Oh, how they long to do that:
"The surest way to work up a crusade in favor of some good cause is to promise people they will have a chance of maltreating someone. To be able to destroy with good conscience, to be able to behave badly and call your bad behavior 'righteous indignation' this is the height of psychological luxury, the most delicious of moral treats."
attributed to Aldous Huxley, Chrome Yellow (1921)
warrprayer
(4,734 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)He seems to really get down to the world of "pleasure;" not just the day-to-day hedonism which rarely goes beyond the degrees of sensuousness one feels. He probed deeply into other kinds of pleasures, especially those reflected (whether he intended or not) in the social policy of what I call "prohibitionism." I find his outlook, as capsuled in the quote, consistent in most any kind of prohibition. Gin, gays, guns, ganja; reproductive rights and the new kid-on-the-block, tobacco (which WILL become full-blown prohibitionism very soon).
One can get lost in the old rabbit hole that everything is economically determined. Before our eyes, everyday, people act on impulses which are at best only tangentially related to money and economy: The drunk man or woman who pushes away from the bar to follow home an easy mark and get some easy, steamy sex; the millions of bullies on-line who take pleasure in both inflicting pain and that peculiarly pleasurable sensation of anonymity; the pol who with "sad" eyes sympathizes with the parents of a kid left in jail. But who would vote again for the legislation that put the kid there, in a heart beat.
Economic determinism does nothing but lend a cheap worldliness to anyone's argument.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)warrprayer
(4,734 posts)of the dark ages.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)Someone asked upthread about a group working to stop this. From the article, a couple of links:
Families against mandatory minimums: http://www.famm.org/aboutus/StaffandBoard/JulieStewart.aspx
Legislation to give judges more flexibility in mandatory minimum cases: https://www.leahy.senate.gov/press/bipartisan-legislation-to-give-judges-more-flexibility-for-federal-sentences-introduced
As a longtime Deadhead myself (first Dead show 1979, still seeing the surviving members play music when I can) I found myself wondering how many people this happened to. Never heard of this guy before, which made me wonder if it's even all that unusual. Unbelievable, what a country we live in.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)Sick drug laws in this country.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)Sad.
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)free tim tyler
(1 post)[link:http://tbo.com/news/crime/mandatory-minimums-keep-many-nonviolent-people-behind-bars-20130817/|
http://tbo.com/news/crime/mandatory-minimums-keep-many-nonviolent-people-behind-bars-20130817/
This is a story that came out today. tbo.com/news/crime/mandatory-minimums-keep-many-nonviolent-people-behind-bars-20130817/
Below is an op-ed from Rand Paul.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/aug/16/paul-the-madness-of-mandatory-minimums/?page=2
washingtontimes.com/news/2013/aug/16/paul-the-madness-of-mandatory-minimums/?page=2
[link:http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/aug/16/paul-the-madness-of-mandatory-minimums/?page=2|
Not sure if I can put links in here.
He's already been in prison for over 21 years. How long is enough time?
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)Rand Paul and the Washington Times are not respected sources around here. This is a site for members of the Democratic Party, hence the name Democratic Underground.