Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
Mon Jul 29, 2013, 01:45 PM Jul 2013

Fear of Froth

Anyway, the passage in question is striking; whatever it says about the Fed succession, it does give us a sense of how the people Obama listens to talk. And it’s not good:

And what I’m looking for is somebody who understands the Fed has a dual mandate, that that’s not just lip service; that it is very important to keep inflation in check, to keep our dollar sound, and to ensure stability in the markets. But the idea is not just to promote those things in the abstract. The idea is to promote those things in service of the lives of ordinary Americans getting better.

And when unemployment is still too high, and long-term unemployment is still too high, and there’s still weak demand in a lot of industries, I want a Fed chairman that can step back and look at that objectively and say, let’s make sure that we’re growing the economy, but let’s also keep an eye on inflation, and if it starts heating up, if the markets start frothing up, let’s make sure that we’re not creating new bubbles.


So, here we are with inflation at a long-term low, many economists arguing that we need higher inflation expectations, and unemployment the overwhelming problem we face. Yet Obama appears if anything to give more emphasis to inflation-fighting than to unemployment reduction, and throws in stuff about bubbles; basically, he has a definite tight-money lean. I don’t know who it’s coming from.

And this has, by the way, been true all along. Back in the fall of 2009 the word I got was that senior Administration officials believed that we were in a Treasury bubble,and that long-term interest rates — then around 3.5 percent — might soar any day now. This in turn was partly behind the disastrous “pivot” away from unemployment to deficits.

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/29/fear-of-froth/
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fear of Froth (Original Post) phantom power Jul 2013 OP
Combine this with snot Jul 2013 #1
K&R I can't even bring myself to bother writing about this idiocy any more. Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #2
And I thought this was about Politicalboi Jul 2013 #3

snot

(10,530 posts)
1. Combine this with
Mon Jul 29, 2013, 01:51 PM
Jul 2013

the fact that most of the "stimulus" went to the wealthy, who are still sitting on most of it, rather than to the poor, who would have spent it in ways that might actually have stimulated the economy to the benefit of all . . . . and it's not a pretty picture.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fear of Froth