Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 01:13 PM Aug 2013

Obama Anti-War Stance Strained by Calls to Act on Syria

By Mike Dorning - Aug 27, 2013
Among the pivotal moments of Barack Obama’s political career was an October 2002 speech challenging the tide of public opinion to oppose war with Iraq. His anti-war stance helped him win the Democratic nomination in 2008, and later the White House.

Now, inside the Oval Office, Obama confronts the possibility of embroiling the U.S. in another Mideast conflict, as he considers how to respond to evidence that the Syrian government used chemical weapons against civilians.

On one side is a drumbeat for intervention from allies around the world and some Republicans in Congress. On the other is a U.S. public weary of 12 years of war in Iraq and Afghanistan and offering little support for new military commitments in the region.

“There’s a level of irony,” in Obama’s dilemma, said Tad Devine, a Democratic strategist and an adviser on the 2004 presidential campaign of John Kerry, who’s now Obama’s secretary of state.

While his administration begins laying the groundwork for a decision on military action, the president hasn’t hidden his reluctance to act against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime. To move forward, he would have to rally the U.S. public.

MORE...

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2013-08-27/obama-anti-war-stance-strained-by-calls-to-act-on-syria.html

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

leftstreet

(36,112 posts)
1. Maybe he could offer to wash Assad's car
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 01:14 PM
Aug 2013

This is all such bullshit

Just one more PR spin about how Obama is FORCED!!!11 to do the opposite of what he wants

Drale

(7,932 posts)
2. He was against the current wars because he saw they were based on lies but
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 01:16 PM
Aug 2013

if Assad really has used Chemical Weapons on his people well that is an Act of War and I really doubt the President would get us stuck in another un-winnable war, that's a Republican thing. Any response from the US is going to be fast hard, and short much like Libya.

 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
5. "but if" is not justification for launching an attack. Show me the proof Assad used chems. That
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 01:58 PM
Aug 2013

is all I'm asking...

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
4. He was anti Iraq war. It was a very good thing.
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 01:54 PM
Aug 2013

He is very far from anti war. The term anti war and Obama should not go together unless Iraq is added.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
6. "anti-war stance"? I bet the lede-writer makes fun of Republicans for living in their own alternate
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 02:02 PM
Aug 2013

reality all the time...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama Anti-War Stance Str...