Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
Mon Sep 30, 2013, 06:20 PM Sep 2013

Ruh roh, sane Republicans may pick fight with Boehner and the Teahadists.

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/359969/moderates-revolt-over-cr-jonathan-strong

In what is by far their boldest stand since the GOP took control of the House in 2010, a group of them are threatening to bring down a vote on the rule for the government-funding bill scheduled for 6:30 p.m.

New York representative Peter King is leading the charge, and his fellow New Yorker Michael Grimm is close behind him. The group told leadership on Saturday they have 25 members who are willing to bring down the rule.

That number of defections would defeat the rule, which, like all such votes, is a party-line affair. “How many of them are going to follow up today with the pressure and everything else, I don’t know,” King told me in a phone interview.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ruh roh, sane Republicans may pick fight with Boehner and the Teahadists. (Original Post) geek tragedy Sep 2013 OP
Works for me. Andy823 Sep 2013 #1
what took them so long warrior1 Sep 2013 #2
Cowardice nt geek tragedy Sep 2013 #5
what took them so long warrior1 Sep 2013 #3
The "rule" I assume is the "Hastert Rule" BlueStreak Sep 2013 #4
No, it's a procedural rule to bring the resolution up for a vote. nt geek tragedy Sep 2013 #6
OK. I guess the effect is the same either way. BlueStreak Sep 2013 #7

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
1. Works for me.
Mon Sep 30, 2013, 06:25 PM
Sep 2013

Peter King doesn't much care for Cruz, and he has said he too will run for the nomination in 2016, so it looks like he is going to be the one running for the more "sane" part of the party, if there is one, while Cruz is trying to get the "insane" part of the party. This is going to be good! I can hardly wait for Cruz to start telling Boehner what to do.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
4. The "rule" I assume is the "Hastert Rule"
Mon Sep 30, 2013, 06:27 PM
Sep 2013

which isn't actually a rule, I don't think -- only a gentleman's agreement that the speaker won't bring up any bill that doesn't have a majority of the Republican caucus. What is significant here is that if there are 25 Republicans willing to vote for a clean bill, then obviously a clean bill would pass the House.

I almost never agree with King about anything, but he is absolutely right when he says (my paraphrase) that if Obamacare is only 1/100th as bad as they are claiming, then they will take over the House and Senate in 2014 and sail to a GOP President in 2016. And if they do that, they can repeal the whole thing fair and square. So what are they afraid of?

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
7. OK. I guess the effect is the same either way.
Mon Sep 30, 2013, 06:36 PM
Sep 2013

If there are 25 Republicans willing to vote for a clean bill, then it would be a done deal. All Boehner has to do is bring it up for a vote.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ruh roh, sane Republicans...