Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

NotThisTime

(3,657 posts) Mon Sep 30, 2013, 07:32 PM Sep 2013

How is it under the ACA corporations can hold off paying your healthcare bill for the first three

months of employment? In this case instead of paying the employee rate you pay the Cobra rate? There's an eleven hundred dollar difference per month between the employee rate and the new hire rate? Anybody know anything about this sort of situation?

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How is it under the ACA corporations can hold off paying your healthcare bill for the first three (Original Post) NotThisTime Sep 2013 OP

healthcare.gov? Tarheel_Dem Sep 2013 #1

So you do not know the answer either, Riftaxe Sep 2013 #2

Never said I knew the answer, nor do I care. But, if it's REALLY information... Tarheel_Dem Oct 2013 #3

Tarheel_Dem

(31,234 posts)

1. healthcare.gov?

Reply to NotThisTime (Original post)

Mon Sep 30, 2013, 07:36 PM

Sep 2013

https://www.healthcare.gov/ There are people who get paid to answer these questions.

Riftaxe

(2,693 posts)

2. So you do not know the answer either,

Reply to Tarheel_Dem (Reply #1)

Mon Sep 30, 2013, 10:15 PM

Sep 2013

I know procedurally why, and I think it is BS. Surprisingly enough, you will not find the real answer at your link, which kind of makes one think why you bothered with the useless deflection.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,234 posts)

3. Never said I knew the answer, nor do I care. But, if it's REALLY information...

Reply to Riftaxe (Reply #2)

Tue Oct 1, 2013, 02:01 AM

Oct 2013

you're looking for, I think the source is much better than a chat board, don't you?

Reply to this discussion