Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Not the Onion..'How we won in Iraq'' by David PETRAEUS (Original Post) Ichingcarpenter Oct 2013 OP
Info from a Tampa man DonCoquixote Oct 2013 #1
Though it was a typo, "ridiclue" is my new favorite word Recursion Oct 2013 #6
hey DonCoquixote Oct 2013 #13
Once again announcing himself to be a world-class asswipe jsr Oct 2013 #2
"Iraq today looks tragically similar to the Iraq of 2006" joshcryer Oct 2013 #3
? Recursion Oct 2013 #7
He does. joshcryer Oct 2013 #15
2013 is pretty close muriel_volestrangler Oct 2013 #19
Fair enough Recursion Oct 2013 #20
I don't know if the kidnapping is still significant muriel_volestrangler Oct 2013 #21
It looks like low-grade civil war to me in the west. bemildred Oct 2013 #25
+1 Festivito Oct 2013 #18
Careful malaise Oct 2013 #4
Blowing an innocent country to smithereens newfie11 Oct 2013 #5
I like your thinking .. we need to send you Ichingcarpenter Oct 2013 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author newfie11 Oct 2013 #12
or 'How we paid off the warlords so we could pretend we won' KG Oct 2013 #9
We won? B Calm Oct 2013 #10
We really really really lost. Enthusiast Oct 2013 #22
We all know what the war profiteers won, but what exactly did 'we' win in Iraq? Snake Plissken Oct 2013 #11
Lying liars and the lies... sendero Oct 2013 #14
All we won was the hatred and loathing of the rest of the World. another_liberal Oct 2013 #16
Agree with everything you said.... ReRe Oct 2013 #17
No doubt he'll get a hero's welcome . . . another_liberal Nov 2013 #30
That bunch just can't believe... ReRe Nov 2013 #32
What he describes is at best "salvaged", not "won" JHB Oct 2013 #23
Petraeus' new talk is on Ichingcarpenter Oct 2013 #26
So ... "Mission Accomplished" ???? JoePhilly Oct 2013 #24
obviously petraeus doesn't know shit from shinola. he's in the war business, what else would he say spanone Oct 2013 #27
We even lost what we wanted the most -- Chinese companies were selected by Iraq govt SDjack Oct 2013 #28
With foreward by Ted Cruz Blue Owl Oct 2013 #29
That's the Orwellian newspeak world we live in. marmar Nov 2013 #31

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
1. Info from a Tampa man
Thu Oct 31, 2013, 05:27 AM
Oct 2013

This idiot Petraus wound up making a fool of himself in Tampa thanks to a bunch of idiot socialites who fashioned themselves Mata Hari, save that they were simply trying to use secrets to become rich and famous. It takles a very special sort of idiot to actually earn consistent ridiclue in a city that provides so much fodder for the tabloids.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/08/20/petraeus-mistress-secretly-followed-tampa-socialite/

Normally I would not quote Fox News, but note how even THEY dare not polish the mess.

So, this tampa Boy would NOT trust Petraus judgement on where to get a decent Cuban Sandwich in Tampa. Actually, no where on Bayshore Blvd (the rich place where he did his work, think of a cheap house being about 2 million) has good Cubans, save the Publix. It does NOT surprise me that he reveals just how follish he was. And to think, if not for a bunch of would be Mata Haris, he would still be in charge, getting primed as a GOP prez in 2016, and probably kill a LOT of people in the process.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
13. hey
Thu Oct 31, 2013, 06:36 AM
Oct 2013

it is early am where I am, so my brain is stillsleepy, but frankly, I think I may have stumbled onto something...

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
3. "Iraq today looks tragically similar to the Iraq of 2006"
Thu Oct 31, 2013, 05:36 AM
Oct 2013

I don't have the stomach to read that whole thing because he starts talking strategy in a monotone robotic military type of writing style, and I don't know what to say. I skipped to the last page to read his conclusion.

"Iraq today looks tragically similar to the Iraq of 2006"

If Iraq and the Iraqis are to have yet one more opportunity to move forward, they would likely find it useful to revisit the entire array of approaches pursued in 2007 and 2008. It is heartening, thus, to know that some of the veterans of the surge, American as well as Iraqi, are engaged in the effort to help Iraq determine and then pursue the initiatives needed to address the terrible increase in violence in that country. This is a time for them to work together to help Iraqi leaders take the initiative, especially in terms of reaching across the sectarian and ethnic divides that have widened in such a worrisome manner. It is not too late for such action, but time is running short.


If further action is necessary, Petraeus, then we have not "won" in Iraq.

I went back to skim for the surge bullshit, in 2007 and 2008, and it led to many deaths in Americans and Iraqi's alike. He's basically arguing for the Iraqi people to surge and acting as if "that's the winning strategy." What he doesn't understand is that the "surge" led to the current state of unrest in Iraq to begin with. Ethnic cleansing is going on in that country, and the US hasn't won shit.

Read your own fucking words Petraeus. POS war criminal.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
7. ?
Thu Oct 31, 2013, 06:08 AM
Oct 2013
What he doesn't understand is that the "surge" led to the current state of unrest in Iraq to begin with

Eh? I don't think you can compare 2013, or even 2008, with 2005 and early 2006, can you?

muriel_volestrangler

(101,341 posts)
19. 2013 is pretty close
Thu Oct 31, 2013, 07:38 AM
Oct 2013
http://www.iraqbodycount.org/database/ (Monthly table)

2005: 16,212 deaths - 1,351 per month.
1st 4 months of 2006: 1,544, 1,570, 1,940, 1,794.

2013: October casualties so far: 1,056 civilians killed.
Over 7,000 killed this year.

It's not that far below the 2005 figures.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
20. Fair enough
Thu Oct 31, 2013, 07:40 AM
Oct 2013

I didn't realize it was that high. I honestly don't know much at all about the current violence; I was under the impression the "drag people off in the night and torture them to death with power drills" stuff had stopped.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,341 posts)
21. I don't know if the kidnapping is still significant
Thu Oct 31, 2013, 07:47 AM
Oct 2013

but the number of bombs, and the casualties from them, is high at the moment.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
25. It looks like low-grade civil war to me in the west.
Thu Oct 31, 2013, 08:24 AM
Oct 2013

If you want to still consider it separate from the Syrian conflict. I think the chaos in Iraq is not unrelated to the sudden desire to restore some sort of order in Syria, perhaps. Even if the Saudis don't like it.

newfie11

(8,159 posts)
5. Blowing an innocent country to smithereens
Thu Oct 31, 2013, 06:04 AM
Oct 2013

Bombing innocent civilians, distroying infrastructure, poisoning the country with radioactive parts left behind.
Yeah this is sure something to be proud of!!!

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
8. I like your thinking .. we need to send you
Thu Oct 31, 2013, 06:09 AM
Oct 2013

to Afghanistan to head that operation and then to the CIA.

Do you teach? You could get a job at a prestigious university too. You know how to get things done

Response to Ichingcarpenter (Reply #8)

KG

(28,752 posts)
9. or 'How we paid off the warlords so we could pretend we won'
Thu Oct 31, 2013, 06:11 AM
Oct 2013

it's a fucking joke. run of the mill generals defeating a prostate country with the largest army in the world suddenly being hailed as some sort of genius for the not fucking it up.

Snake Plissken

(4,103 posts)
11. We all know what the war profiteers won, but what exactly did 'we' win in Iraq?
Thu Oct 31, 2013, 06:19 AM
Oct 2013

4,486 American fatalities?

32,223 Wounded Americans?

Trillions of dollars in debt?

Providing al Qaeda a base in the Middle East to operate?

One Million dead Iraqis?

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
16. All we won was the hatred and loathing of the rest of the World.
Thu Oct 31, 2013, 07:00 AM
Oct 2013

Despite the bravery, sacrifice and monumental waste that went into our war against Iraq, all we won was the hatred and loathing of the rest of the World, that and, finally, a chance to leave in shame and disgust.

Petraeus is a war criminal and a self-serving liar. Look for him to run for political office soon.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
17. Agree with everything you said....
Thu Oct 31, 2013, 07:30 AM
Oct 2013

... that SOB needs to go somewhere and never come out in public again. Does he have bodyguards?

Should read "How I won in Iraq!" It was party time all the while he was over there, right? What a POS. Nothing more disgusting than a dude who is a legend in his own mind, when in fact he is a pure-tee narcissistic psychopath.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
30. No doubt he'll get a hero's welcome . . .
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 09:37 AM
Nov 2013

He's just waiting for most people to forget about the mistress, then he'll run for office on the slogan: "Our military won in Iraq and Afghanistan, but Obama stabbed us in the back!"

Look for him to receive a hero's welcome at the next Republican national convention.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
32. That bunch just can't believe...
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 10:48 AM
Nov 2013

... that the party is over. They have no idea how ridiculous they look and sound. This one ('Betrayus) needs to go to his retreat and become an outdoors-man for the rest of his life and stay OUT of the publics eye.

JHB

(37,161 posts)
23. What he describes is at best "salvaged", not "won"
Thu Oct 31, 2013, 08:18 AM
Oct 2013

Here's the money quote:

At the highest level, President Bush's decision to conduct the surge was exceedingly courageous. His advisers were split on the decision, with many favoring other approaches that in my view would have failed. And as the going did get tougher over the early months of the surge, President Bush's steadfast leadership and his personal commitment to seeing the war through to a successful conclusion (albeit one that might take many years to unfold) took on enormous significance.

***
President Bush's commitment had an enormous psychological effect on our men and women in Iraq, as well as on the Iraqi people. Our troopers recognized that we had a chance to do what was needed to reverse the terrible cycle of violence that had gripped Iraq in the throes of civil war. And the citizens of the Land of the Two Rivers realized that there was still hope that the new Iraq could realize the potential that so many had hoped for in the wake of the ousting of Saddam Hussein and the collapse of the Ba'athist regime in 2003.

Nowhere does he mention that everything he writes about was due to the complete, double-barreled failures of Bush: first and foremost for launching the war under false pretenses, and second -- having launched the war -- the absolute and complete failure to maintain order and provide the public with basic security and other needs. Everything in Petraeus's article is about cleaning up the mess that took root because Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, and the rest of the neocon PNAC gallery bet the lives of soldiers and civilians that their pet power play could be done on the cheap. And what would they care if it didn't? They got rid of Saddam like they wanted to, and the rest didn't cost them anything, did it? What price did they pay?

Iraq is not a "win", certainly not on the alleged (and now obviously false to anyone not infoxicated) reasons for launching the invasion, nor even on "oust Saddam and let Iraqis move on" grounds. Accepted counterinsurgency doctrine would have required at least twice the number of troops Rumsfeld sent in, with three- or four-times the number more likely to be effective. Of course, troop levels that high would have made it impossible to keep claiming that the war could be done quickly and cheaply, which would have changed the political calculations of those who voted for the AUMF. So the Bushies said whatever would get their foot in the door, and to hell with whoever paid the actual price for it.

That observation is glaringly absent from Petraeus' talk about his "win".

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
26. Petraeus' new talk is on
Thu Oct 31, 2013, 08:32 AM
Oct 2013

How Normandy was really a diversion and the real attack was supposed to be on the Pas-de-Calais. It was only when the Allies' diversion worked better than expected that they called off the main invasion at the Pas-de-Calais.

Anyway thanks for your input because I know many couldn't stand reading his revision of history and needed some insight on his article.

It made me so angry I had to make a joke about it and not tear it apart as it needed to be done.

I'm sure his op ed will get tons of rebuttals over time.

spanone

(135,855 posts)
27. obviously petraeus doesn't know shit from shinola. he's in the war business, what else would he say
Thu Oct 31, 2013, 09:10 AM
Oct 2013

fuck the warriors

SDjack

(1,448 posts)
28. We even lost what we wanted the most -- Chinese companies were selected by Iraq govt
Thu Oct 31, 2013, 09:44 AM
Oct 2013

to exploit its oil fields.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Not the Onion..'How we wo...