Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
119 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
You know for those who celebrate Christmas, (Original Post) gopiscrap Nov 2013 OP
Yes the church picked the date to get people to stop celebrating pagan holidays. hrmjustin Nov 2013 #1
yes I know that the statement was for the non thinkers gopiscrap Nov 2013 #6
Was Jesus MagnumUK Nov 2013 #2
Good question gopiscrap Nov 2013 #3
according to virtually all historians the question has been answered arely staircase Nov 2013 #27
you mean according to wikipedia, and "biblical scholars". Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #81
no arely staircase Nov 2013 #87
The only way Richard Dawkins would "know" Jesus existed, would be if he was alive 2000 years ago. Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #93
valid point. he accepts that is the consensus of historians arely staircase Nov 2013 #95
Again, I do not believe that the objective existence of "Jesus" is even a front-burner topic for Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #97
any scholars antiquity arely staircase Nov 2013 #98
I get that it's very important to you to think that everyone accepts that. Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #99
history matters arely staircase Nov 2013 #100
Do you accept that History is based upon objective evidence as opposed to popular consensus? Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #101
funny arely staircase Nov 2013 #102
Again, every "Atheist" in the world could "Say Jesus existed" Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #104
obviosly not everyone arely staircase Nov 2013 #106
I don't know. However, I think there is more objective historical evidence to say so Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #107
ok let us try to underetand one another arely staircase Nov 2013 #112
Fair enough. I'm saying I don't know. Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #113
fair enough arely staircase Nov 2013 #114
*** Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #116
Aww... this has got to be the most heart-warming exchange I've seen on DU in some time. LAGC Nov 2013 #118
one last thing arely staircase Nov 2013 #119
I like to think so. hrmjustin Nov 2013 #5
Like the Tootsie Pop commercial says: Jamaal510 Nov 2013 #11
Depends what the Bible says sakabatou Nov 2013 #109
some of us celebrate Festivus napkinz Nov 2013 #4
Ah, but . . . Petrushka Nov 2013 #7
would that be the Feast of the Annunciation, March 25th? gopiscrap Nov 2013 #8
Nope! Petrushka Nov 2013 #24
you know in the Roman Catholic liturgical calendar gopiscrap Nov 2013 #26
wasn't the IC the conception of Mary by her mother? nt arely staircase Nov 2013 #50
no gopiscrap Nov 2013 #51
I think so arely staircase Nov 2013 #52
Immaculate Conception = Mary Tree-Hugger Nov 2013 #74
Yes Tree-Hugger Nov 2013 #73
Yes it was. Warpy Nov 2013 #111
There was a show... Tree-Hugger Nov 2013 #75
My celebration is all about pscot Nov 2013 #9
You know its funny... yuiyoshida Nov 2013 #10
that to me shows the ethnocentricty of the US gopiscrap Nov 2013 #12
You maybe correct, I suspect this started... yuiyoshida Nov 2013 #14
from what I read, for the most part it did. gopiscrap Nov 2013 #16
Since I am yuiyoshida Nov 2013 #20
I bet gopiscrap Nov 2013 #21
Thank you (seriously) for your informative posts panader0 Nov 2013 #46
lol yuiyoshida Nov 2013 #72
The holiday season is all about LIGHT. . . DinahMoeHum Nov 2013 #13
Why do you hate Santa Claus!? Rex Nov 2013 #15
Virginia, there really is no Santa Claus. gopiscrap Nov 2013 #17
... Rex Nov 2013 #18
What about in the other states? seattle15 Nov 2013 #30
welcome to DU gopiscrap Nov 2013 #31
it's a play on words gopiscrap Nov 2013 #32
Because no one gets his real name right. It's Santa CLAWS. sakabatou Nov 2013 #110
Did you really need to start another Christmas thread, not that long after your first? (nt) Nine Nov 2013 #19
some people can't wait to prove how cool they are n/t ProdigalJunkMail Nov 2013 #37
You going for some kind of record? Union Scribe Nov 2013 #22
ah it's 54 days til Christmas not even 2 months gopiscrap Nov 2013 #23
The crafting catalogs pipi_k Nov 2013 #115
Yeah, but my mother and my sister-in-law both were frazzled Nov 2013 #25
Our son was born the day after Christmas. gopiscrap Nov 2013 #36
It doesn't make any difference, it's a good day to have it. Uncle Joe Nov 2013 #28
I don't care. I'm in it for the gifts and food n/t Violet_Crumble Nov 2013 #29
If this is all you have to live for it's not people who celebrate X-mas who have the problem. Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2013 #33
hey my post wan't an opinion it was a fact gopiscrap Nov 2013 #38
The other posters in this thread seem to notice a pattern with your OPs. Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2013 #82
So what? TexasProgresive Nov 2013 #34
Christmas has nothing to do with Jesus Nevernose Nov 2013 #35
I agree it's not about Jesus gopiscrap Nov 2013 #42
True that Nevernose Nov 2013 #43
because the other 364 days there isn't a real connection gopiscrap Nov 2013 #44
Yes you are a victim of Christmas Egnever Nov 2013 #49
That is not true for Christians. Christmas is about the birth of Jesus Christ. hrmjustin Nov 2013 #117
Don't worry about it. WinkyDink Nov 2013 #39
Gee, and you know what else? cherokeeprogressive Nov 2013 #40
So what? It's a wonderful holiday if done with proper Pretzel_Warrior Nov 2013 #41
So? cordelia Nov 2013 #45
I do not celebrate Xmas, just the spirit of the holiday. n/t RebelOne Nov 2013 #47
So? Egnever Nov 2013 #48
Well, I am an asshole then. Texasgal Nov 2013 #53
I celebrate the seasons, family, friends and giving to them and others elfin Nov 2013 #54
Most people who celebrate Christmas know that. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2013 #55
you'd be amazed how many people don't know that. gopiscrap Nov 2013 #56
I don't know anyone who doesn't know that. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2013 #57
I know a shit load of crazy ass fundies who swear to God that if their church says Jesus was born on gopiscrap Nov 2013 #59
Oh, well, fundies are a completely different breed. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2013 #62
I love it gopiscrap Nov 2013 #64
You're like the kid who reminds the teacher she forgot to assign homework for the weekend nt. ProudToBeBlueInRhody Nov 2013 #58
why? because I said Jesus wasn't born on 12/25? gopiscrap Nov 2013 #60
Because no one who enjoys Christmas gives a flying you know what nt. ProudToBeBlueInRhody Nov 2013 #61
historians do gopiscrap Nov 2013 #63
Don't blame the Christians JustAnotherGen Nov 2013 #65
yeah I know gopiscrap Nov 2013 #66
I love the spiritual stance JustAnotherGen Nov 2013 #78
Good for you ProudToBeBlueInRhody Nov 2013 #67
then at least be honest about it, gopiscrap Nov 2013 #69
I've never pretended about anything ProudToBeBlueInRhody Nov 2013 #71
You need an excuse to spend time with family and friends? HangOnKids Nov 2013 #83
I need a day off when they have a day off too ProudToBeBlueInRhody Nov 2013 #91
SO which historians are actively concerned with the objective historical "existence" of Jesus Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #79
Christmas is just a ripoff of Saturnalia. Vashta Nerada Nov 2013 #68
yup gopiscrap Nov 2013 #70
It's much older than that. It's about the days getting longer, etc. Good stuff. Good times. Enjoy. freshwest Nov 2013 #76
I like Easter. Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #80
actually MFM008 Nov 2013 #77
So? DrDan Nov 2013 #84
You know horse birthdays are not recognized on the date of their birth, right? DrDan Nov 2013 #85
and the Declaration of Independence was not signed on July 4th. Motown_Johnny Nov 2013 #86
I hope you have a wonderful holiday season pintobean Nov 2013 #88
You must be a real hoot at children's parties Seeking Serenity Nov 2013 #89
actually I am...all the kids love me because I am crazier than shit gopiscrap Nov 2013 #90
When the Tao is absent, ritual arises. Lao Tse Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2013 #92
So? Glassunion Nov 2013 #94
I'm an atheist, so I don't care. I enjoy Christmas anyway. Throd Nov 2013 #96
*GASP!* NOOOO! The scales have fallen from my eyes! Oh THANK YOU!! nolabear Nov 2013 #103
I celebrate a totally secular Christmas. So did my parents. Manifestor_of_Light Nov 2013 #105
Feel better now? Boom Sound 416 Nov 2013 #108

gopiscrap

(23,758 posts)
6. yes I know that the statement was for the non thinkers
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 05:48 PM
Nov 2013

who blindly celebrate more as a cultural holiday ignoring it's historical and religious significance.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
27. according to virtually all historians the question has been answered
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 06:56 PM
Nov 2013

Historical elements[edit]

Existence[edit]

Most modern scholars of antiquity agree that Jesus existed, and most biblical scholars and classical historians see the theories of his non-existence as effectively refuted.[7][9][10][30][31][32] In antiquity, the existence of Jesus was never denied by those who opposed Christianity.[33][34] There is, however, widespread disagreement among scholars on the details of the life of Jesus mentioned in the gospel narratives, and on the meaning of his teachings.[11] Scholars differ on the historicity of specific episodes described in the Biblical accounts of Jesus,[11] and the only two events subject to "almost universal assent" are that Jesus was baptized by John the Baptist and was crucified by the order of the Roman Prefect Pontius Pilate.[12][13][14]

Robert E. Van Voorst states that the idea of the non-historicity of the existence of Jesus has always been controversial, and has consistently failed to convince virtually all scholars of many disciplines.[30] Geoffrey Blainey notes that a few scholars have argued that Jesus did not exist, but writes that Jesus' life was in fact "astonishingly documented" by the standards of the time - more so than any of his contemporaries - with numerous books, stories and memoirs written about him. The problem for the historian, wrote Blainey, is not therefore, determining whether Jesus actually existed, but rather in considering the "sheer multitude of detail and its inconsistencies and contradictions".[35] Although a very small number of modern scholars argue that Jesus never existed, that view is a distinct minority and virtually all scholars consider theories that Jesus' existence was a Christian invention as implausible.[11][36] This is different to supernatural or miraculous claims about Jesus, which historians tend to look on as questions of faith, rather than historical fact.[37]

The sources for the historicity of Jesus are mainly Christian sources, but there are some mentions also in a few non-Christian Jewish and Greco-Roman sources, which have been used in historical analyses of the existence of Jesus.[38] These include the works of 1st-century Roman historians Josephus and Tacitus.[38][39]

Jesus as myth[edit]

Main article: Christ myth theory

The Christ myth theory (also known as the "Jesus myth theory" or "Jesus mythicism&quot is the proposition that Jesus never existed in any form but was invented by the Christian community around 100 CE. The idea was first put forward in the late 18th century and developed and popularised in the 19th century by Bruno Bauer.[40]

A few contemporary writers, notably G. A. Wells, Richard Carrier, Earl Doherty and Robert M. Price[41] still regard the question of whether Jesus ever existed as open. This position is not held by most professional historians, nor the vast majority of New Testament scholars.[9][42][43][44] Richard Dawkins wrote that while Jesus probably existed, it is "possible to mount a serious, though not widely supported, historical case that Jesus never lived at all."[45]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_Jesus#Existence

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
81. you mean according to wikipedia, and "biblical scholars".
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 08:17 AM
Nov 2013

There is zero non-suspect evidence outside the Bible of the historical evidence of Jesus. Now, a lack of evidence is not evidence of lack, but to go back and say "oh, Biblical scholars who study the Bible all agree that Jesus existed... after all, it says so right in the Bible"

that's not really proof.

The Josephus account is the ONLY non-Biblical piece of data, and it is widely considered suspect because, among other things, the tone was wildly off for allegedly coming from a prominent Jewish historian of the time.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
87. no
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 09:52 AM
Nov 2013

According to Wikipedia's sources. Which are scholarly articless. Name half a dozen published peer reviewd historians who argue Jesus didnt exist. They are about as plentiful as scientists who argue their is no man made climate change. Even richard dawkins knows Jesus existed. The mythicist argument is fringe stuff.

http://old.richarddawkins.net/articles/20

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
93. The only way Richard Dawkins would "know" Jesus existed, would be if he was alive 2000 years ago.
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 04:10 PM
Nov 2013

Again, the objective historical evidence is simply not there. Sorry if that fact upsets you, for whatever reason.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
97. Again, I do not believe that the objective existence of "Jesus" is even a front-burner topic for
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 04:35 PM
Nov 2013

"historians" who are not, again, "Biblical Scholars".

Dare I say it again, "Biblical Scholars" have sort of a tautological vested interest in the validity of the Scholarlyness of the Bible. But the Josephus account is highly suspect, and all the other "evidence" is in the NT.

It's a pointless debate, which is probably why most Historians who aren't somehow already invested in religious narratives, don't touch it. If you want to study Rome in the time of Caesar and Augustus, "Jesus" isn't on the radar.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
99. I get that it's very important to you to think that everyone accepts that.
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 04:41 PM
Nov 2013

"Not wanting to go there" is not the same thing as "accepting that the man lived".

Also, there's nowhere in the Dawkins piece that says "Jesus had an objective historical existence blah blah blah". Dawkins is talking about certain broad moral take-aways that are commonly attributed to Jesus, although some of them can be traced back to Buddha or other traditions as well.

He is not, in that article, weighing in on the historical debate.

But again, it's a pointless argument. "He did SO live!" Okay, whatever. There's no evidence outside the Bible. And the Bible is not exactly an infallible document, from where I sit.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
100. history matters
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 04:45 PM
Nov 2013

Amd the argument that Jesus didn't even live is not the consensus of historians and represents a fringe even among ouspoken atheists. It just is.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
101. Do you accept that History is based upon objective evidence as opposed to popular consensus?
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 04:55 PM
Nov 2013

Because the objective evidence for the existence of "Jesus" is not there.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
102. funny
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 05:05 PM
Nov 2013

When Bart Ermhan wrote his book, Did Jesus Exist? The complaint among atheists was that he was setting up a stawman. "I don't know any atheists who say Jesus didn't exist" was the complaint. I guess the atheists quoted in this article should tune in to DU's religion page. See in the real world it is considered an insult and a strawman among most atheists scholars to even be acused of thinking Jesus wasn't an actaul person. Funny, that.

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/1400465

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
104. Again, every "Atheist" in the world could "Say Jesus existed"
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 05:14 PM
Nov 2013

it still wouldn't mean that the objective Historical evidence is there.

Why don't you go track down the objective historical evidence, rather than sitting here engaging in endless iterations of "everyone says it so it MUST be TRRRUEEE!"

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
107. I don't know. However, I think there is more objective historical evidence to say so
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 05:30 PM
Nov 2013

in the form of contemporary accounts from the time of his alleged existence, as opposed to retroactive stories told centuries later.

You seem far more emotionally invested in this "debate", such as it is, than I am. I don't need to believe "Jesus" DID "exist", or didn't. Actually, I think it's a compelling story, which -regardless of whether or not a man like that actually followed that story trajectory in Nazareth/Galillee/Jerusalem, or not- I am sure contributed to its popularity in the ensuing centuries.

But my predisposition towards the scientific method and evidence-based analysis means I am not inclined to give "special treatment" to ANY idea or assertion, and if the assertion is that "Jesus" had an objective existence roughly akin to that which is told in the NT, the evidence outside the bible just isn't there.

That doesn't mean he DIDN'T exist- and the huffpo article you link is far more focused on debunking arguments comprising "no he definitely did not" than it is providing any additional evidence that, yes, he did. Saying "Oh the arguments saying he didn't are ideological and the people making them are silly pooopy-heads" does not contribute one factual iota to any claims that yes, he did.

I don't know, that's the bottom line: these alleged events were 2000 years ago. I do find it interesting, from a psychological standpoint, any time I see what I perceive as clothesless emperor freaking-outage.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
112. ok let us try to underetand one another
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 05:45 PM
Nov 2013

I am not arguing that Jesus existed. OK? Only that the general consensus among historians is that he did. Yes I am a Christian. But I am not a fundie who thinks everyone has to agree with me. Ok?. I have a degree in history and I have done a lot of reading on this subject. I reject any pseudo-historian claiming that Jesus walked on water or preformed any miracles. That is not history. No historian will go on the record and claim he did. But like Socrates, Jesus of Nazareth is thought by most historians to have been a real person. That could change. I am from a religious tradition that accepts science and othet scholarly persuits even if the condradict our beliefs. I am not trying to push religion here.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
113. Fair enough. I'm saying I don't know.
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 05:47 PM
Nov 2013

And I'm saying that if you take away the accounts of the New Testament, there's not much evidence to back up the assertion, and what evidence there is- like the Josephus stuff- is considered highly suspect by the same Historians who agree on Jesus's existence.

They're taking the same data and coming to a different conclusion.

LAGC

(5,330 posts)
118. Aww... this has got to be the most heart-warming exchange I've seen on DU in some time.
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 06:28 PM
Nov 2013

Two seemingly opposing viewpoints, settled amicably in the end.

Time for a group hug:

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
119. one last thing
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 06:34 PM
Nov 2013

I appreciate greatly your last two posts. The only things I accept about jesus as a historian are that he was baptised by John the baptist and crucified under Pontius Pilate. That is all I would be willing to vouch for. If you would like to debate the existence of Jesus as a historical figure I would be willing to do it on the religion page. We would have to give ourselves time to respond, etc. If you dont that is cool too. These things can be exhausting as shit.But you seem to doubt the existence of the historical Jesus while I accept it. This isn't a call out. Send me a PM and we will lay the ground rules. I only suggest it because it would make ME do some research and would be fun. Please excuse phne sent typos.

Petrushka

(3,709 posts)
24. Nope!
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 06:21 PM
Nov 2013

When Jesus was born, there were shepherds in the fields watching their flocks at night. Shepherds, in the Middle East at that time, kept their flocks in the fields only from Spring to Fall but not during the Winter months when they sheltered them from the rain and cold---which makes December 25th the unlikely date of His birth. If, however, Jesus was conceived in December, some might celebrate His birth in September during the Feast of Booths.


gopiscrap

(23,758 posts)
26. you know in the Roman Catholic liturgical calendar
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 06:47 PM
Nov 2013

Last edited Sat Nov 2, 2013, 09:34 PM - Edit history (1)

the Feast of the Immaculate Conception is December 8th

Tree-Hugger

(3,370 posts)
73. Yes
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:37 AM
Nov 2013

Mary is the Immaculate Conception. The IC refers to the conception of Mary, free of Original Sin, within the womb of her mother, St. Anne.

The term "Immaculate Conception" is often erroneously used to refer to Jesus.

Warpy

(111,254 posts)
111. Yes it was.
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 05:44 PM
Nov 2013

Mary was "conceived without sin," which meant without sex. She is the first purely parthenogenetic human being and therefore the only suitable vessel to receive god's offspring.

By the way, the term "virgin birth" meant the first child of any woman back then.

Tree-Hugger

(3,370 posts)
75. There was a show...
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:48 AM
Nov 2013

Years ago, I watched a show where they were discussing theories regarding the true date of His birth. Based on positions of stars and planets they came up with September in the year 7 BCE. I think they figured out an exact day, too.

I went to Catholic school and by 5th grade, we were taught that December 25 was a symbolic date, used to take over the Solstice or Saturnalia, and not Jesus' true birthday.

yuiyoshida

(41,831 posts)
10. You know its funny...
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 06:00 PM
Nov 2013

Most Japanese are considered Shinto Buddhist. Maybe less than 1% of the population are actually Christians. But yet, "Kurisumasu" is celebrated in Japan anyway. That is because there, it is a Romantic holiday, like Valentines Day is here. Gifts are given, couples go out to dinner (Yes KFC, is pushed but hey,they got their claws embedded in the culture there now) and there are the traditional Christmas Cakes;


There are tons of Xmas trees, lights and all the trimmings, but its a holiday that does not involve people taking time off from work.. The biggest Holiday in Japan is New Years! Xmas in Japan is so very different from the United States. Its like a pretty wrapped up christmas gift with nothing inside, like those fake boxes you see under a tree, in a store window.

People there enjoy the holiday, if they have it off. Most people work that day, as any normal day. There is lots of music, celebrations, Christmas Trees and gift giving, especially to small children. But very few look at it as a religious holiday. Its never treated as a religious holiday.

Bill O'Reilly would just hate it!

yuiyoshida

(41,831 posts)
20. Since I am
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 06:15 PM
Nov 2013

Shinto Buddhist, I enjoy their idea of Christmas... but its sure is hard to find someone to share that Kurisumasu Keki with!

DinahMoeHum

(21,784 posts)
13. The holiday season is all about LIGHT. . .
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 06:03 PM
Nov 2013

. . .during the shortest daylight time of the year.

What do Christmas, Chanukah, Kwanzaa, Winter Solstice, Saturnalia, etc. all have in common?

Candles, ie. LIGHT

"Newborn Sun" (solstice) . . . . . . . . . . "Newborn Son" (Christmas)

gopiscrap

(23,758 posts)
32. it's a play on words
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 07:44 PM
Nov 2013

remember the famous response of an editor to the little girl named Virginia?

"Yes Virginia, there really is a Santa Claus."

gopiscrap

(23,758 posts)
23. ah it's 54 days til Christmas not even 2 months
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 06:20 PM
Nov 2013

I fgure if the stores can put up their shit before Halloween, I can at least bitch about it after Halloween

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
25. Yeah, but my mother and my sister-in-law both were
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 06:27 PM
Nov 2013

Two December 25 birthdays in one Jewish family. Pretty cool. (Though I imagine my grandmother and my mother-in-law had a tough time at the hospital giving birth on Christmas Day!)

gopiscrap

(23,758 posts)
36. Our son was born the day after Christmas.
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 08:03 PM
Nov 2013

we used to kid him and tall him that he would get the toy for Christmas and the batteries for them for his birthday. In reality because we were always so busy and trashed at Christmas, he was allowed to have two friends over for a very small party and then on his half birthday (June 26th) we would have his big party. It was funny when he turned 18, we told him he was old enough to just celebrate his birthday on it's regular date. He was bummed that he wouldn't get two birthdays anymore.

Uncle Joe

(58,355 posts)
28. It doesn't make any difference, it's a good day to have it.
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 07:17 PM
Nov 2013

That's only three to four days after the darkest day of the year, at least in the Northern Hemisphere.

So from a symbolic stand point that date works.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winter_solstice

In the Northern Hemisphere this is the Southern solstice, the time at which the Sun is at its southernmost point in the sky, which usually occurs on December 21 to 22 each year.[3] In the Southern Hemisphere this is the Northern solstice, the time at which the Sun is at its northernmost point in the sky, which usually occurs on June 20 to 21 each year.[4]






Thanks for the thread, gopiscrap.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
33. If this is all you have to live for it's not people who celebrate X-mas who have the problem.
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 07:45 PM
Nov 2013

There's no point in sifting through every facet of something looking for reasons to ruin it for other people who simply want to enjoy the time with family and friends.

gopiscrap

(23,758 posts)
38. hey my post wan't an opinion it was a fact
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 08:05 PM
Nov 2013

I didn't say either way whether is was good or bad..me thinks this Christmas celebrator has thin skin and is a bit judgmental of others.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
82. The other posters in this thread seem to notice a pattern with your OPs.
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 08:17 AM
Nov 2013

You don't like Christmas, we get it, but maybe there's a reason you only find lumps of coal in your stocking.

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
35. Christmas has nothing to do with Jesus
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 08:01 PM
Nov 2013

It's about getting together with family and friends, putting up decorations, giving presents, ridiculous outdoor lights, traditional songs, drinking too much (as a warm-up for New Year's!), finding some snow if you're lucky, roaring fires, days off from work, greeting cards from people you don't see often, and a whole lot more that has little -- if anything -- to do with Jesus.

gopiscrap

(23,758 posts)
42. I agree it's not about Jesus
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 08:08 PM
Nov 2013

but it's also become not about friends and family and celebration either...it's become about giant corporations fucking folks out of their money.

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
43. True that
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 08:55 PM
Nov 2013

Of course, how does that make it any different than the other 364 days we're getting fucked in the nose? If it ain't the sanctity of Santa, it's graduation specials, or the Easter bunny! or Memorial Day, or Columbus Day, or President's Day. They can and will do everything in their power to fuck us out of our money.

Is it really the corporations' fault, I wonder? People don't have to sell their souls for cheap consumer products on Black Friday, nor do they have to do anything other than spend time with family and friends. What's lacking in our society? What's lacking that makes us so much more willing to shoot each other, or neglect one another, or neglect ourselves? Other countries have the same conglomerates shoving shit down their throats, but the people don't seem to have lost their "souls."

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
40. Gee, and you know what else?
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 08:07 PM
Nov 2013

Martin Luther King Jr. wasn't born on the third Monday in January...

Inauguration wasn't born on the first Jan 20 following a Presidential Election...

George Washington wasn't born on the third Monday in February...

Memorials weren't born on the last Monday in May...

Independence wasn't born on the 4th of July...

Labor wasn't born on the first Monday in September...

Columbus wasn't born on the second Monday in October...

and

Turkeys weren't born on the fourth Thursday in November...

So I would hope that in the spirit of your attitude concerning the birth of Jesus Christ, that you demand the right to WORK on all of those days, and for no more than your regular hourly pay.

I hope I covered it all.

Texasgal

(17,045 posts)
53. Well, I am an asshole then.
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 09:44 PM
Nov 2013

thank you for that.

I enjoy spending time with my family, putting lights on the house and eating good food.

I am not a jesus freak, I am a normal American that enjoys the holidays.

Thanks for shitting on me.

elfin

(6,262 posts)
54. I celebrate the seasons, family, friends and giving to them and others
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 09:59 PM
Nov 2013

Even tho not a believer, do like the carols, the tree, decorations and lights.

Can celebrate all the year around, but somehow the holiday is special that way.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,683 posts)
55. Most people who celebrate Christmas know that.
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 10:06 PM
Nov 2013

The celebration is symbolic; it doesn't matter what the real date was. It was set to correspond with pagan ceremonies celebrate the return of the sun (when the days start getting longer after the winter solstice). It does seem like a good time of year to have a big party.

gopiscrap

(23,758 posts)
59. I know a shit load of crazy ass fundies who swear to God that if their church says Jesus was born on
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 10:12 PM
Nov 2013

12/25 then by God, he was born on 12/25!

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,683 posts)
62. Oh, well, fundies are a completely different breed.
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 10:15 PM
Nov 2013

I was just referring to normal people who happen to celebrate Christmas.

gopiscrap

(23,758 posts)
60. why? because I said Jesus wasn't born on 12/25?
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 10:13 PM
Nov 2013

I didn't supply a positive nor negative opinion on it, just made a statement and left it that.

JustAnotherGen

(31,818 posts)
78. I love the spiritual stance
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 05:15 AM
Nov 2013

Or non stance.

It's the only philosophy that lets me say "What would Moses do?", Good Friday and Easter are macabre, and believe a human being got married, started to be referred to as Rabbi, died a horrific macabre death, and naturally for his time and stature had a wife and kids. It's okay to believe in his words, reject every single other thing in the "New Testament" and believe not in a ghost - but in the words and example handed down with his birth anytime on earth . . . Regardless of when his birth to two Human beings took place.

And I'm of the mindset he was most likely born in March.

Politics aside you will be hard pressed to find two UUs that believe in the exact same thing outside of no one really knows until we die. . But - when you take the words (including the Gnostics and how they appear there) our "politics" as members are very much in alignment with his words.

I rarely jump into spiritual conversations at DU - but to me Christmas on speed is kind of thumbing our nose at stopping the world for the PDR "celebration". One human being - not a supernatural being with several ancient religions attached to it to make it more palatable for the people of the time.

So we (UUs) brought our European solstice based traditions of lit trees, merriment, food and celebration to America and stong armed America (much as Adams snuck in our philosophy of One God in a sucker punch - deism) into taking a day to be joyful at life and kindness and light - since we are all wonky and weird over the macabre PDR (Easter).

Arius would be quite proud of us - the Syrian Rabbi was murdered as a result of trying to stop the trinitarian imposition of pagan traditions being pegged on an extremely devout Jewish Rabbi - but alas - the Coptics prevailed.

That said as a UU - I will ask the universe to surround and protect Coptics Christians and Muslims in Egypt once again- at Christmas. It's where the split happened and where I'm of the mindset Unitarian's had our first declaration of defiance.

ETA - we made up for it (Christmas - reminding Christians that THEIR founders put all the Pagan/Earth Based Trappings on Christmas) by giving America non Sect Public Education. Look up Horace Mann. A man of his time who had to work within the framework of ignorance in the 1800's but his Unitarian personal cause was Public Education. Mine is feeding the hungry. And I LIVE it.

gopiscrap

(23,758 posts)
69. then at least be honest about it,
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 10:25 PM
Nov 2013

that you're pretending to be celebrating the birth of Jesus on an artificially contrived day of his birth.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
79. SO which historians are actively concerned with the objective historical "existence" of Jesus
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 08:12 AM
Nov 2013

and what actual non-biblical evidence are they basing it on?

Here's a hint; if you're talking about anyone except "Biblical scholars" (who have a vested interest in the subject matter) you'll be hard pressed to find anyone who will argue that "he" was "born" on Dec. 25, to be sure.

You'll also find there's not a hell of a lot of objective evidence proving "he" was "born" on any of the other 364 days of the year.

But since you're dealing with religion and mythology, who gives a shit? It's like arguing whether Quetzlcoatl's feathers were "really" yellow or orange.

MFM008

(19,808 posts)
77. actually
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 05:10 AM
Nov 2013

some scholars have said he was born in the summer, closer to mid july. I dont remember why at the moment. Oh well the Queen wasnt born on her 'official' birthday either....

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
84. So?
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 08:37 AM
Nov 2013

I celebrate it. I am a non-believer. I celebrate it on the 25th . . . but every once in a while we might celebrate it a day or so in either direction.

We give gifts. We get together and have a nice meal.

What is your point?

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
85. You know horse birthdays are not recognized on the date of their birth, right?
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 08:41 AM
Nov 2013

Guess that puts a pox on the Kentucky Derby - a race for 3-year olds.

Throd

(7,208 posts)
96. I'm an atheist, so I don't care. I enjoy Christmas anyway.
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 04:33 PM
Nov 2013

When I was an art-school hipster I hated Christmas, but being a cynical asshole was a requirement at that time in my life.

 

Manifestor_of_Light

(21,046 posts)
105. I celebrate a totally secular Christmas. So did my parents.
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 05:15 PM
Nov 2013

No nativity scenes. I'm a UU secular humanist who studies Buddhism.

So what's the big deal? I love to cook at Turkey Day and Christmas. Unfortunately I have very few family to celebrate with.


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You know for those who ce...