General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNye Bevan
(25,406 posts)they would be fully in favor of handing condoms out like candy.
niyad
(113,600 posts)fund one brand of contraceptives as "approved by the church". of course, he did not know at the time that the rcc is actually one of the big funders of a pharma whose main product is. . .
jeff47
(26,549 posts)And reproduction is easier than recruiting.
niyad
(113,600 posts)seriously, though, accurate, reliable reproductive health education is also a must (another thing the woman-hating, pro-forced-birthers are trying to destroy)
OnionPatch
(6,169 posts)Their stance against abortion is just a way to punish women who have sex out of wedlock. They don't even like married women to have too much fun. (Sex is for procreation doncha know?) Free and ample birth control for all women is even scarier to them than access to abortion is.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)Frankly, it would go a long way toward solving a lot of societal ills.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)SunSeeker
(51,741 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)fierywoman
(7,696 posts)I agree with the basic premise. But, dear DU-niks, you are avoiding or evading something built into a part of our culture. Twenty or so years ago I was burnt out from being a classical musician, so I got a job for 14 months on a psychic line reading tarot and astrology (yeah, yeah, bash and pooh-pooh all you want, but listen...) We had a standard call, the bread and butter of the business, called the Do He Love Me? call. The second question that always followed: Is she pregnant? (meaning the third person in the relationship.). This is the only time in my life I talked to this segment of the population. It became clear to me that these women's identities and/or personal sense of self rested on the idea of: (1) being connected to a male and (2) thinking/assuming that they would seal the deal by creating a child to bind the male to them. I even had a girl call to find out when she could become pregnant, and she knew nothing of her cycle, and did not understand the word "conceive." After a few dozen of these calls (I did over 2,000 readings in my time there) I started giving safe sex advice (it was the early '90s and AIDS was raging.) Interesting to be "the psychic" and telling them to use condoms!
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Bye.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)niyad
(113,600 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Am I misinterpreting the post?
niyad
(113,600 posts)scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)whose sense of self-worth totally revolves around getting a man, and who believe that getting pregnant will "seal the deal", as you said.
Thank you for your post - I imagine that the psychic phone line job was an interesting, if disheartening, window into human behavior. At least you tried to do some good by telling them to use condoms.
sw
progressoid
(49,999 posts)willing to throw their money away on telephone psychics.
RainDog
(28,784 posts)The stigma of birth control use is tied to people who slut shame younger women into not taking precautions for pregnancy.
They get beyond the reality that they want to have sex by pretending "It just happened!" - see the Palin girl, whatever her name is.
Teenage and younger unmarried women have sex.
This nation needs to deal with this reality and instead of saying "Abstinence only!", say, "Don't have sex until you're ready. Don't have sex unless you can deal with the reality that this relationship may not last."
Don't have sex without birth control protection until you are ready and able to take care of a child for the rest of your life.
Children should be planned and wanted. We no longer live in the 1800s.
Not to say birth control failures don't happen. They do. And that's a case when abortion should also be available.
Iris
(15,673 posts)um... well, no. children do grow up.
and no sex at all unless you are willing to take care of a child until you die? what's the point of a conversation about contraceptives then?
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)unless you are ready to take care of a child. For the rest, I think the idea was to emphasize the amount of commitment a child requires.
RainDog
(28,784 posts)It IS a lifetime commitment in many cases when a child is born with a disability, and, the reality is that children grow up and most are fine, but it's also a reality that children, even when they are grown, look to parents for the emotional support that is part of an unconditional love in an often harsh world.
Too often, kids have kids so that someone will love them. That's backwards.
But the point I was trying to make, most of all, is that children shouldn't be an "oops" moment.
Sex isn't just about having children, so people shouldn't pretend that having children is something that cannot be planned for - that's good for children, not just for people having sex. Not to say that children cannot be loved and wanted even when they're not planned, and, even when planning birth control is not 100% effective.
I don't think having sex automatically means someone is ready to be a parent.
Those are two moments that are no longer automatically connected since the advent of safe, reliable birth control.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)seveneyes
(4,631 posts)And not just to avoid abortions. We really need to reduce the number of kids born into poverty and the disaster it is leads to.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)Make no mistake, there are a few who believe that abortion is absolutely wrong. Those people are few. Most in the "pro-life" anti-Choice) movement oppose abortion because it is a form of birth control. They do not care about "ending" life in the womb. They are angry that women have autonomy.