Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums3 reasons why Fukushima has nothing to do with Starfish Wasting Syndrome
http://fukushimaupdate.com/three-reasons-why-fukushima-radiation-has-nothing-to-do-with-starfish-wasting-syndrome/This post is authored by Chris Mah, a Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History researcher. Chris is one of the worlds leading experts on starfish and echinoderms in general. He created and writes for Echinoblog, a one stop reading place for everything echinoderm. You can find him at Twitter @echinoblog.
Some have become concerned that there is a direct influence from Fukushima. Much of this seems unlikely. Deep-Sea News (among many other sources) have presented excellent reviews of data that can help the rational person make sense from some of the confusing deluge of misinformation.
1) Starfish Wasting Disease/Syndrome (SWD/SWS) pre-Dates Fukushima by 3 to 15 years. This is probably the most self-evident of reasons. One of the earliest accounts of starfish wasting disease was recorded from Southern California (Channel Islands) in 1997 (pdf). The account of SWS in British Columbia was first documented by Bates et al. in 2009, and their data was collected in 2008. Fukushima? March 2011.
2) Starfish Wasting Syndrome Occurs on the East Coast as well as the Pacific. Many of the accounts alleging a Fukushima connection to Starfish Wasting Syndrome forget that there are also accounts of SWS on the east coast of the United States affecting the asteriid Asterias rubens. There is no evidence (or apparent mechanism) for Fukushima radiation to have reached the east coast and therefore the Fukushima idea is again not supported.
3) No other life in these regions seems to have been affected. If we watch the original British Columbia Pycnopodia die-off videos, and the later Washington state die-off vidoes, one cannot help but notice that other than the starfish, EVERYTHING else remains alive. Fish. Seaweed, encrusting animals. etc.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1008 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
3 reasons why Fukushima has nothing to do with Starfish Wasting Syndrome (Original Post)
Bonobo
Jan 2014
OP
I would lay bets if they look hard enough they will find this is toxic shock speading along
Drew Richards
Jan 2014
#2
Thanks for this post. I'm still waiting for someone--anyone--to post a CREDIBLE link
Common Sense Party
Jan 2014
#5
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)1. I love echinoblog (and deep sea news and aquanerd and.. and.. and.. )
Dorky reef keepers unite!
Drew Richards
(1,558 posts)2. I would lay bets if they look hard enough they will find this is toxic shock speading along
The coast from oil spills...much more probable than anything to do with Fukushima.
longship
(40,416 posts)3. But, but, but...
The herring! The salmon! The eagles in Utah! The Arctic ice decrease! And don't forget the elephants in Africa! It has to be Fukushima! I read about it on the Internets.
R&K
grantcart
(53,061 posts)4. Good Luck
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)5. Thanks for this post. I'm still waiting for someone--anyone--to post a CREDIBLE link
that demonstrates that significant increased levels of radiation have reached North America.
You'd think that with people trying to claim that North American starfish, eagles, bees, etc. are all suffering from Fukushima radiation, they would have some...you know, EVIDENCE that there actually IS Fukushima radiation here.