Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dear CNN: Hillary has an Iowa problem? Well, SO DO I! (Original Post) PeggyKR Jan 2014 OP
DITTO, DITTO, DITTO, DITTO, DITTO, to all the points made in link. northoftheborder Jan 2014 #1
Bring it on, Texas!!! PeggyKR Jan 2014 #2
here in Texas, it's always a done deal before we even vote Skittles Jan 2014 #3
Thank you! PeggyKR Jan 2014 #4
And we wouldn't have to put corn oil in our cars DamnYankeeInHouston Jan 2014 #5
HA! PeggyKR Jan 2014 #6
My mommy and step-daddy...in Iowa... LOVE HER!!! all american girl Jan 2014 #7
Hello, Ms. Iowa! PeggyKR Jan 2014 #8
There should be a rotating privilege somehow of the order of primaries. libdem4life Jan 2014 #9
A better way? PeggyKR Jan 2014 #10
They have for years, but it's "the way it is" and apparently serves those who could have it changed. libdem4life Jan 2014 #11
Blind eyes... PeggyKR Jan 2014 #12
Yes. It defeats the core value of democracy. Living on the West Coast, many a times I was tempted libdem4life Jan 2014 #13
EVERY voice...EVERY vote. PeggyKR Jan 2014 #14
I'd like to see MN team up with IA MNBrewer Jan 2014 #15
Anything would be better.. PeggyKR Jan 2014 #16

northoftheborder

(7,572 posts)
1. DITTO, DITTO, DITTO, DITTO, DITTO, to all the points made in link.
Tue Jan 14, 2014, 09:51 PM
Jan 2014

I'm sick of Iowa too. Why not TEXAS first? That would really stir up a lot of publicity for everybody!

PeggyKR

(177 posts)
4. Thank you!
Tue Jan 14, 2014, 10:02 PM
Jan 2014

I cannot tell you how many elected officials I have talked to about this and NO ONE gives a darn..so, so frustrating!

all american girl

(1,788 posts)
7. My mommy and step-daddy...in Iowa... LOVE HER!!!
Tue Jan 14, 2014, 10:48 PM
Jan 2014

And this Iowa girl, who is moving overseas...LOVE HILLARY!!! Should I mention that my Army hubby is a HUGE Hillary fan. Maybe not And hubby knows Iowa...just saying....

Democratic people are not the freaks that you see with the republicans...just saying....they want you to work for it, but they are not cray cray........

PeggyKR

(177 posts)
8. Hello, Ms. Iowa!
Tue Jan 14, 2014, 10:52 PM
Jan 2014

First and foremost, please thank your husband for his service to his country! Big Hugs for that.

But, I live in Hillary Clinton's hometown...just blocks from where she grew up. But, in the current system, I may not even get the chance to vote for her. If she runs, she'll get the nomination, I feel. But what if someone wanted to vote for someone else? Their voice may never be heard. It's wrong.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
9. There should be a rotating privilege somehow of the order of primaries.
Tue Jan 14, 2014, 10:56 PM
Jan 2014

But then there is the stupid Electoral College...which isn't going anywhere. That and the Winner Take All option used by some states skews everything.

PeggyKR

(177 posts)
10. A better way?
Tue Jan 14, 2014, 11:26 PM
Jan 2014

There has GOT to be a better and FAIRER way. I don't know why more people don't SCREAM about this..totally be left out of our democracy!

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
11. They have for years, but it's "the way it is" and apparently serves those who could have it changed.
Tue Jan 14, 2014, 11:44 PM
Jan 2014

It's tantamount to having a third party...just not going to happen...seems. I know some states have moved up their primaries over the years for this purpose, but the "Iowa is First" has not been breached.

On Edit: The time zones make for interesting circumstances, as well...lived on the West Coast for decades.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
13. Yes. It defeats the core value of democracy. Living on the West Coast, many a times I was tempted
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 03:23 PM
Jan 2014

to not go through the hassle because the winner was almost always known/called, as they say, and California always went Blue. I never did not vote because there were always other issues on the ballot, but as far as President, meh.

The idea was floated to forbid the news sources from calling winners in states after 1 or 2% of the votes were in, but that was futile. I mean, what would the news folks have to say for all those hours.

I personally believe that low turnout has much to do with all of this poll-taking and news technology and shameful boatloads of cash that people really think their vote doesn't much matter. And in the poorer/ethnic areas, polling places are hard to access, so someone slouches into Washington DC to be propped up by, small wonder, the MSM and the Money Boys/Girls.

PeggyKR

(177 posts)
16. Anything would be better..
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 09:11 PM
Jan 2014

Make it so...let's get this ball rollilng! Maybe it'll catch on...fairness, I mean!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dear CNN: Hillary has an ...