Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,059 posts)
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 07:24 PM Jan 2014

Another bad day for Benghazi conspiracy theories

Posted with permission.

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/more-setbacks-benghazi-conspiracy-theory

Another bad day for Benghazi conspiracy theories
01/15/14 04:06 PM

By Steve Benen



The U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, better known as the Senate Intelligence Committee, published an 85-page report (pdf) today on the attack that left four Americans dead in Benghazi in September 2012. Its findings will likely seem pretty familiar.

The State Department’s failure to heed warnings and requests for more security by diplomatic staff left the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya, and its CIA annex vulnerable to the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks that ultimately took the lives of four Americans, according to an unclassified Senate Intelligence Committee report released Wednesday.

The report, which the committee approved by a voice vote, concluded that the attacks could have been prevented and makes several recommendations for improving security of U.S. diplomatic facilities in areas where U.S. personnel are likely to face threats.


If this seems to cover familiar ground, that’s because previous investigations have led to very similar conclusions. The Washington Post’s Aaron Blake noted that Republicans, especially those eager to tear down former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, are likely to be “sorely disappointed” by the findings.

That’s clearly true
. As Adam Serwer’s report makes clear, there was no “stand down” order; Susan Rice did nothing wrong; and there was no White House interference with the creation of post-attack talking points. Indeed, of all the various Republican allegations about a conspiracy, there remains literally no evidence to bolster the far-right paranoia.

Indeed, if GOP officials who tried to destroy Susan Rice’s reputation apologize now that their attacks have been discredited, I remain confident that she’d be gracious about their misguided smear campaign.

All of this, however, leads to a larger question: just how much more will it take to convince the Republican conspiracy theorist they were wrong?

I did a little digging this afternoon and found that over the course of the last 15 months, the deadly attack in Benghazi has now been investigated by:

* the independent State Department Accountability Review Board, led by former Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen and career diplomat Thomas Pickering;

* the Senate Intelligence Committee;

* the Senate Armed Services Committee;

* the House Intelligence Committee,

* the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee;

* the House Armed Services Committee;

* the House Committee on Oversight & Government Reform;

* and the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.


And those are just the official investigations, led by current and former U.S. officials, and don’t include investigative reports from journalists at major news organizations.

After all of this scrutiny, there’s still no evidence of a cover-up or a conspiracy. None.
The allegations raised by the Obama administration’s fiercest and angriest critics are still without substantiation.

Given the latest report, which reinforces the previous reports, are Republicans finally prepared to move on to some other alleged conspiracy? Of course not. Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) saw the findings of the Senate Intelligence Committee and said, “It should be clear, even to my critics by now, that Benghazi is bigger than Watergate.”

Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.) added, “I’m familiar with cover-ups throughout history, the Pentagon Papers, Iran-Contra, all of them. This is gonna go down as the greatest cover-up in history because the president and Susan Rice both knew it was an organized terrorist attack and deliberately sent Susan Rice to tell the American people it was not.”

It doesn’t matter that they’re wrong; they don’t care. They start with the conclusion and try to work backwards to find evidence that satisfies their goal. If the evidence doesn’t match the preconceived answer, then there’s a problem with the evidence, not the assumptions.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Another bad day for Benghazi conspiracy theories (Original Post) babylonsister Jan 2014 OP
Unfortunately it isn't stopping the morons in congress giftedgirl77 Jan 2014 #1
NBC Nightly News is pinning this on Hillary Clinton. phylny Jan 2014 #2
Secretary Clinton WARNED Republicans ----> napkinz Jan 2014 #3
Republican Hypocrisy ... napkinz Jan 2014 #4
Thanks napkinz! Cha Jan 2014 #5
you're welcome :) napkinz Jan 2014 #6
This NEEDS to Be FRont and CENTER! Cha Jan 2014 #7
meegbear started a thread I responded to napkinz Jan 2014 #8
Lindsey Graham's answer ... napkinz Jan 2014 #9
they don't care about no stinking facts..... spanone Jan 2014 #10
Benghazi Put To Rest ... napkinz Jan 2014 #11
 

giftedgirl77

(4,713 posts)
1. Unfortunately it isn't stopping the morons in congress
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 07:32 PM
Jan 2014

from blaming it on Obama & his Administration. They have been out in full force stating how the blame lies solely at their feet.

To top it off Joe Scum even tweeted out linking to a Fox News article, the hypocrisy amazes me.

phylny

(8,380 posts)
2. NBC Nightly News is pinning this on Hillary Clinton.
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 11:22 PM
Jan 2014

Makes me puke.

"That will be fodder for any presidential campaign."

napkinz

(17,199 posts)
3. Secretary Clinton WARNED Republicans ---->
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 06:31 AM
Jan 2014





Republicans slashed diplomatic security budget, still trying to cut more

May 09, 2013

As part of the Republican majority that has controlled the House the last two years, Mr. Issa joined in cutting nearly a half-billion dollars from the State Department’s two main security accounts. One covers things like security staffing, including local guards, armored vehicles and security technology; the other, embassy construction and upgrades. In 2011 and 2012, President Obama sought a total of $5 billion, and the House approved $4.5 billion.

Utah teabagging Rep. Jason Chaffetz has been a leading proponent of Benghazi conspiracy theories, yet even he isn't shy to proclaim his votes against diplomatic security:

O’BRIEN: Is it true that you voted to cut the funding for embassy security?
CHAFFETZ: Absolutely. Look, we have to make priorities and choices in this country.

Their priorities have consequences. Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton (among others) had long warned Republicans that they were weakening national security by cutting, well, security. Back in February of 2011:

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton emerged from a meeting with House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) sharply critical of proposed Republican cuts to the State Department budget, warning they “will be detrimental to America’s national security."

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/05/09/1208061/-Republicans-slashed-diplomatic-security-budget-still-trying-to-cut-more



She WARNED them (House Republicans). They didn't listen. The GOP must be held accountable.





Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Another bad day for Bengh...