General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBrian Schweitzer sure seems to have team inevitable in a huff
anyone who can get team inevitable in this much of a lather is someone I want to check out further
tkmorris
(11,138 posts)I like it!
SidDithers
(44,273 posts)Sid
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)"anyone who can get team inevitable in this much of a lather is someone I want to check out further"
...caught the attention of some other too:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024342214
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024340484
Funny, how people jump to assume that opposition to Schweitzer is support for Hillary. LOL!
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)I look at the people who went ape shit on him and didn't need to assume.
The usual suspects attacking him saying that him wanting single payer is the same position as Rove told me all i need to know...especially when it came from multiple people within minutes of each other
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"I look at the people who went ape shit on him and didn't need to assume. "
...doubt Hillary supporters are on the offensive, but that is not the only opposition to Schweitzer.
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)I watched multiple people on multiple threads try to claim he is just like Karl Rove when in face he wants the EXACT OPPOSITE and I saw all i needed to see
ProSense
(116,464 posts)What does that comment have to do with the point I made? LOL!
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Did you see my thread about his bitter enemies? Tea Party associated radical anti-enbvironmentalist organization?
Very telling. Very telling to see people here in alliance with that stinko groupl
1000words
(7,051 posts)Chan790
(20,176 posts)It'd be nice if someone who was actually willing to run and was more progressive than Schweitzer or Clinton could work "Team Inevitable" into this kind of lather.
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)we need another Wellstone
mikekohr
(2,312 posts)Without the votes in the House and Senate the most liberal President will be seriously hamstrung. Everytime.
Democrats dominate 13 states, Republicans dominate 26. There are more of us, but the system in set in favor of small/rural states and skewed even further by "clumping" of Democratic voters in super majority districts.
"You don't need to be smart to succeed in politics. But you do need to be able to count"
-Robert F. Kennedy-
Chan790
(20,176 posts)You have to understand how big gun control is in Southern New England and the urban East Coast. Yes, Brian Schweitzer will win you votes in rural America. He's dead in the water and will never gain even a modicum of traction, even as the Democratic nominee, someplace like CT where there is a substantial single-issue vote pool for stronger gun control.
(You need to understand this. Many Nutmeggers would trade the signature accomplishments of the current Democratic administration for a repeal of the 2nd Amendment. Not a majority, but enough that a Republican like Chris Christie willing to discuss gun control would win CT against the likes of a NRA-friendly Democrat like Schweitzer solidly.)
You can't lose safe Democratic states to win Republican leaning states. There will never be a strong RKBA Democratic nominee because the Democratic breadbasket of the Northeast is made up of voters no more willing to compromise on guns than they are on abortion.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)They'd never make it through the primary or lie their ass off to get the nomination about how they luv teh gunz and then have to backpedal later.
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)could it be if he gets a chance on an even platform people might like him?
Wouldn't want to spill the team inevitable apple cart
JI7
(91,032 posts)you don't see critical stuff of Elizabeth Warren being posted and there have been more pro warren for president stuff posted. and she has a far better chance of winning against hillary .