General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMy blistering e-mail exchange with a Texas wingnut radio yakker about Wendy DAVIS
The wingut attack on Wendy DAVIS is way ON. There was an article by Dallas Morning News reporter Wayne SLATER describing that her personal story about having been a single parent was OFF, that she wasn't divorced at 19 only until a couple of years later. What she said was that she was a single parent. Then it turns out that the first spouse paid for some of her higher education and that there might have been some infidelity and that he got custody of the kids. Uh, divorce starts out with separation and separation means being single.
So this wingnut radio yakker claims to be all for decency (and I ask, is it possible for a Wingnut to be DECENT?!1) and he claimed that she "fudged her resume" by claiming to be a single parent while not being divorced.
This is what set me off:
********QUOTE******
Did no one escept a Dallas News reporter think to check the facts of her bio? The question: Who is moved & which way are they moved by this?
Did her campaign managers & the national Dems pushing her NOT know about Wendy Davis' resume fudge? #WendyDavis
5-14-96: Candidate Davis knows experience of struggle | Elections & Politics | News from... http://www.star-telegram.com/1996/05/14/5501200/candidate-davis-knows-experience.html?storylink=addthis#.UuAMfKzmjTE.twitter
+@startelegram
********UNQUOTE********
So I Replied:
Yip, didnt take long to beat on Wendy DAVIS like a drum, or, the way Jeb Crow Shrub (of all people) described Joe SCARBOROUGHs on-air style as beating baby seals. Yesterday there were side by side t.v. screens and CNN was featuring the Purdue shooting while the Faux Propaganda Network did whatever it was that was not Purdue or CHRISTIE.
Fudging resumes is about employment. DAVIS was describing biographical (not employment) items, and a divorce becoming final a year or two or more after separating (= single parent) is not a fudge. What part of lowlife jerks do we not know as the Wingnut DNA?
The Eternal question about a wingnut: How can a DECENT person be a wingnut? I think there must be some different kinds of medications besides the ones that control mood swings: There must be one that suppresses Shame and Conscience that wingnut yakkers and politicians use.
And he said:
*********QUOTE********
She embellished her 'resume,' bio or whatever you want to call it. Fatal? No, but worthy of attention. And the story was broken by a longtime GW Bush critic at the Dallas News. How can you defend her fudging of her story to make it better? Takes some of the bloom off her, that's all.
*********UNQUOTE*******
And I Replied:
Its about how LOW DOWN you wingnuts are willing to go and still believe yourselves to be serving a higher cause. The reason I address you and not ***-***-** and the idiot protégé youve got and the Brownshirt dude and the MediCARE scammer is that YOU are the REAL DEAL, the DNA wingnut.
Now, as for Wendy DAVIS. I dont know her. My thing is to WIN against you jackass wingnuts for the first time in 20 years. I dont want to live to see a Secessionist Texas with YOU and your jackass ILK in charge, is that such a reach?! Apartheid Texas.
I am not an IDOLATER. I dont care about Barack, Hillary, Bill, and certainly not DUKAKIS, MONDALE, GORE or whoever the other losers are. ALL that counts is WINNING. The agenda, not the human. (I will still adore FDR, HST, LBJ. As EMERSON said, I contradict myself.)
The same thing YOU are doing attacking personally Wendy DAVIS is what the scumsuckers ATWATER, KKKarl, and Roger STONE have always done. How LOW you are. And you regard yourself as a PILLAR OF THE COMMUNITY. You AINT.
You once said the PALINs were respectable (because she was a governor) while their daughters baby daddy was a lowlife. In what universe has occupying a political position been some kind of diploma for Respectability?! Really, who are you talking to. Did you get any kind of abstract philosophy in your advantaged education?
The simple difference you, such a sophisticated jackass doesnt grasp, between Wingnut and Liberal is the difference between the LETTER and the SPIRIT. Pharisees vs Sadducees. Wingnuts believe in the FABRIC of a flag. Libs believe in what the fabric represents. Sometimes the fabric needs to be burned.
babylonsister
(171,070 posts)defending her!
Cha
(297,279 posts)Response to UTUSN (Original post)
DoBotherMe This message was self-deleted by its author.
DoBotherMe
(2,340 posts)Excellent work!!!! Dana ; )
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)I'm still not clear on what the huge 'fudge' is.
Then again, I fudged a job application to get in with my current employer. I left my MA off of the application because I was afraid they would use that as an excuse to NOT hire me as a janitor.
How can I excuse a fudge? Well you put your best foot forward when you try for a job.
As a voter, I don't expect any candidate to be a perfect person. Nor is that my main issue. What I would say for Texas is, things like this
1. Texas state taxes are some of the most regressive in the nation
2. The poverty rate in Texas is higher than the national average.
What are the candidate's position on these ISSUES?
UTUSN
(70,706 posts)concerned about are completely Democratic and humane. You can look them up.
You missed the part that this Democratic candidate is being personally slimed and it's going to get uglier. This isn't the playing field of policy.
As for my not qualifying to your standards of decency, as the Gestalt Prayer said, I'm not here to live up to your expectations.
Yeah, I'm on the level of the a-holes I'm fighting. You need somebody like me. Oh, and as for job resumes, I never padded mine, so where does that put you?
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)you wrote "is it possible for a Wingnut to be DECENT?!1"
Well, the things he said here do not seem to be particularly indecent.
Whereas they may be wondering "is it possible for a liberal to be decent?" .... And the answer is?
Where does it put me? It puts me employed in a decent paying job with benefits. But I didn't "pad" mine either.
UTUSN
(70,706 posts)to the imagination, have lodged clouds that sounded like the "fudging" allegations against the Democratic candidate came from me instead of the opponents, and have spent most of your posts defending the opponents. For the record, the topics are the personal sliming tactics against this Democratic candidate and fighting back -- fighting back, that is, against wingnuts (and whoever supports them), not other Democrats. As for your scolding and other attempts at distraction, pffft.