Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hack89

(39,171 posts)
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 10:48 AM Jan 2014

Violence Significantly Increased by Social Interactions

Last edited Thu Jan 23, 2014, 03:35 PM - Edit history (1)

It turns out that who you know and spend time with may have more of an influence on your risk of becoming a gun homicide victim, than race, age and gang affiliation, according to a new study from a team of sociologists at Yale University.

Andrew Papachristos, an associate professor of sociology at Yale, analyzed police and gun homicide records from 2006 to 2011 for people living in a high-crime neighborhood in Chicago. He found that 41 percent of all gun homicides occurred within a network of less than 4 percent of the neighborhood's population, and that the closer one is connected to a homicide victim, the greater that person's chances were for becoming a victim. Each social tie removed from a homicide victim decreased a person's odds of becoming a victim by 57 percent.

"What the findings essentially tell you is that the people who are most at risk of becoming a victim are sort of surrounded by victims within a few handshakes," Papachristos says. "These are young men who are actively engaged in the behaviors that got them in this network."

Papachristos says it makes sense to look at the spread of gun violence like the spread of a disease or an epidemic, comparing it to how people contract HIV. Much like the roles needle sharing and unprotected sex play in the spread of HIV, a person's behaviors and personal associations play a role in the spread of gun violence homicides, he says. "It's the behavior of sharing needles that puts you at risk for contracting HIV, not simply being poor and black and living in a certain neighborhood," Papachristos says. "The same is true with violence. It's who you hang around with that gets you in trouble."


http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/11/14/gun-violence-significantly-increased-by-social-interactions

interesting study that perhaps points out a way to predict and possibly stop gun violence.

The Chicago police actually used the study to target gang members:

The commander of a West Side police district plans to knock on the doors of the most dangerous gangbangers to issue warnings to stop the violence.

The effort by Austin District Cmdr. Barbara West comes as Chicago police try to quell gang violence with both innovative ideas and more traditional methods such as paying hundreds of officers to work overtime on their days off.

The strategy is based on research by Andrew Papachristos, a sociology professor at Yale University who conducted a study on the West Side several years ago that showed that much of the violence involved a relatively small number of victims and offenders.

A computer analysis showed a little more than 400 people across the city — including about 25 in the Austin District — are the most at-risk from among more than 16,000 gang members. There can be many reasons for making the list, including lengthy arrest records, the serious nature of the offenses and whether they have been shooting victims themselves.


http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-chicago-police-heat-list-20130721,0,3279169.story
30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Violence Significantly Increased by Social Interactions (Original Post) hack89 Jan 2014 OP
Far more relevant than "studies" about the dangers of gun ownership. Eleanors38 Jan 2014 #1
... nt hack89 Jan 2014 #2
Politically inconvenient LittleBlue Jan 2014 #3
For both sides pediatricmedic Jan 2014 #6
IBTL because it makes sense and we know that's not allowed. n/t Lurks Often Jan 2014 #4
This Is Quite True, Sir The Magistrate Jan 2014 #5
Most Americans live in safe areas with low violent crime hack89 Jan 2014 #7
I Agree Focius Should Be On Illegal Sales, Sir The Magistrate Jan 2014 #8
Do you, Sir, own a fire extinguisher? oldhippie Jan 2014 #9
Unsurprisingly, Sir, You Miss The Point The Magistrate Jan 2014 #11
I think fears of concealed carry are overblown hack89 Jan 2014 #10
Not Quite The Point, Sir The Magistrate Jan 2014 #12
Concealed carry is very low on the list of problems to fix hack89 Jan 2014 #13
It Reflects, Sir, A Serious And Wide-Spread Mis-Perception The Magistrate Jan 2014 #14
Yet that "mis-perception" has coincided with a 20 year decline in gun violence hack89 Jan 2014 #16
Which Reinforces My Point, Sir, Not Yours The Magistrate Jan 2014 #21
So that is grounds to restrict guns? hack89 Jan 2014 #26
Over a 20 year period we cut our murder rate in half hack89 Jan 2014 #15
You Said Something Could Not Be Found, Sir: It Took Almost No Time To Find It The Magistrate Jan 2014 #17
So what is your solution to this "mis-perception"? hack89 Jan 2014 #19
It Is Always Healthy, Sir, For A Society To Shame And Condemn Cowardice The Magistrate Jan 2014 #23
Since I do not own guns for self defense hack89 Jan 2014 #27
A Hobby Is A Good Thing To Have, Sir The Magistrate Jan 2014 #29
I recently spent a delightful day at the Air and Space Museum annex at Dulles airport hack89 Jan 2014 #30
We did it mostly by cutting the environmental lead levels by a lot more than half Fumesucker Jan 2014 #18
So more guns =/= more gun violence? Ok. nt hack89 Jan 2014 #20
It's evident that you have a theory you'd like to put forth Fumesucker Jan 2014 #25
More guns = more gun deaths is a constant theme here hack89 Jan 2014 #28
Rec. PowerToThePeople Jan 2014 #22
Ugh are we really so dumb Egnever Jan 2014 #24
 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
1. Far more relevant than "studies" about the dangers of gun ownership.
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 11:10 AM
Jan 2014

Seems also to fall in line with other data which show most homicides are perpetrated by veteran criminals. Interesting, he keyed his findings from the victim's perspective.

On Edit: This study also confirms that most homicide victims are also veteran criminals.

The Magistrate

(95,247 posts)
5. This Is Quite True, Sir
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 04:16 PM
Jan 2014

And reasonably self-evident to people with much experience of street life.

It makes hash of the insistence of many that they need a gun for self-defense, and indeed, that they face such danger in their lives that they must carry a gun at all times: that simply is not a rational belief, and where people insist on acting from irrational belief, good results seldom follow.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
7. Most Americans live in safe areas with low violent crime
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 04:51 PM
Jan 2014

even in large cities, violence is not evenly distributed.

I agree that very few people need to carry a gun at all times - but then legal carry is not the issue that needs to be resolved. Cracking down on illegal gun sales and use should be a priority. Beef up the ATF so they can but a serious dent in illegal gun sales while focusing the justice system on the criminal use of guns - if you use a gun in the commission of a crime then you go away for a very long time.

The Magistrate

(95,247 posts)
8. I Agree Focius Should Be On Illegal Sales, Sir
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 05:02 PM
Jan 2014

There should be serious tracking of sales, and registration, with requirements of reporting theft promptly and scrutiny of bulk purchases, and serious, intimidating sentences for 'straw purchases', affecting both buyer and seller.

But the point above remains.

Most who insist on carrying guns under concealed carry permits are acting irrationally, and at times this leads to use of the gun which is quite irrational, especially with the lure ( or goad ) of 'stand your ground' laws.

It is a fact that self-inflicted death, whether by accident or suicide, is a greater proportion of gun deaths than killings by criminals. This means that a person who possesses a gun is shouldering an increased risk of harm, and when this is done in the name of self defense, against dangers which are of lesser magnitude than the risk assumed, the act is irrational.

When people act irrationally, on the basis of false to fact beliefs, no good result is likely to obtain.

 

oldhippie

(3,249 posts)
9. Do you, Sir, own a fire extinguisher?
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 05:12 PM
Jan 2014

If so, is your ownership of such a device irrational, as the statistics are that you will never need to use it?

The Magistrate

(95,247 posts)
11. Unsurprisingly, Sir, You Miss The Point
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 07:08 PM
Jan 2014

Possessing a fire-extinguisher presents no quantifiable risk in addition to those normally attendant on life, therefore there is nothing to balance against the potential risk of fire, in order to determine whether fire, or possessing the fire extinguisher, presents the greater risk to my well-being.

A person deciding to acquire a gun, and stating 'self-defense' as the reason, is taking on an additional risk of harm, merely by possessing and handling the weapon. This risk, including suicide and accident, is generally greater than the risk of harm in similar degree by action of some criminal assailant.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
10. I think fears of concealed carry are overblown
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 05:15 PM
Jan 2014

It is not a new concept and there is hard data.

Here for example is what happened in the ten years after Michigan liberalized their concealed carry laws:

Ten years after Michigan made it much easier for its citizens to get a license to carry a concealed gun, predictions of widespread lawless behavior and bloodshed have failed to materialize. Today, nearly 276,000 -- or about four out of every 100 eligible adult Michiganders -- are licensed.

But violent crimes have been rare among carrying a concealed weapon license holders. Only 2% of license holders have been sanctioned for any kind of misbehavior, State Police records show.

Oakland County Sheriff Michael Bouchard said he has always been a proponent of people being able to protect themselves. The troublemakers, generally, aren't the people who go through the process to legally own and carry a gun -- it's the people who carry illegally who cause problems, he said. My position was, and still is, is that the people we have a problem with with guns aren't the people who are willing to follow the law and go through the hoops and training," Bouchard said.


http://www.freep.com/article/20110731/NEWS06/107310482/10-years-after-concealed-weapons-law-unclear-why-many-state-were-gun-shy

Michigan did not see an increase in murders or negligent manslaughter in that period - in fact the number dropped from 672 in 2001 to 567 in 2010.


http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2001

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/tables/10tbl05.xls

I doubt that you can show any state that experienced a meaningful increase in gun deaths after relaxing their concealed carry laws.

The Magistrate

(95,247 posts)
12. Not Quite The Point, Sir
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 07:21 PM
Jan 2014

Simply to stay within the items you have presented, two percent of 270,000 is not an insignificant number of persons, and any criminal action by these people involving a gun is a crime which likely would not have occurred without the carry permit.

One would have to examine reductions in other crime categories over the same period to get a fix on whether the reduction is greater than or less than the basic trend line of crime in that period.

Statistics from Florida indicate an increase in gun murders over the same period:

"Murders by firearms have increased dramatically in the state since 2000, when there were 499 gun murders, according to data from Florida Department of Law Enforcement. Gun murders have since climbed 38 percent — with 691 murders committed with guns in 2011.

"Only partial numbers are available for 2012, but from January to June, there were 479 murders in Florida — 358 of them committed with a gun. That’s an 8 percent increase in gun murders compared to the same period in 2011.

"Guns are now the weapons of choice in 75 percent of all homicides in Florida. That’s up from 56 percent in 2000.

"The rise in gun homicides in Florida comes at a time when the overall murder rate has declined in Florida, and violent crime has dropped statewide."

http://www.publicintegrity.org/2013/04/23/12542/firearm-ownership-rises-florida-gun-murders-increase

hack89

(39,171 posts)
13. Concealed carry is very low on the list of problems to fix
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 08:15 PM
Jan 2014

It is irrelevant to sucides or illegal gun use. It is also irrelevant to accidents in the home or domestic violence.

I personally think every gun owner should have a firearms owner card that comes with training requirements and a background check. Let's license owners.

The Magistrate

(95,247 posts)
14. It Reflects, Sir, A Serious And Wide-Spread Mis-Perception
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 08:32 PM
Jan 2014

The press for such laws is rooted in people's false to fact beliefs about what dangers they face in their lives. You yourself acknowledge it to be the case, and the item you posted above reinforces this, that the generally law-abiding types who secure the permits in belief they need to carry a gun 'for self-defense' do not actually face any appreciable danger. Their belief that they face great danger, that sooner or later they will have to resort to armed violence to defend themselves, is a problem for society and culture as a whole, affecting everything from high politics down to individual's personal interactions with strangers and acquaintances and family.

When false to fact beliefs, and irrational decisions made on the basis of same, become the foundations of policy and law, and set a tone for large portions of society, no good result can ensue.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
16. Yet that "mis-perception" has coincided with a 20 year decline in gun violence
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 08:34 PM
Jan 2014

A period where we have cut our murder rate in half. When you can show an actual harm beyond your personal fears and dislike of guns, let me know.

The Magistrate

(95,247 posts)
21. Which Reinforces My Point, Sir, Not Yours
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 08:46 PM
Jan 2014

Rates of crime have been in decline even as the conviction self-defense by lethal force is a vital personal need is increasing, or in other words, the belief a gun is needed for self-defense bears no relation to actual risk of harm a person faces from other people.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
15. Over a 20 year period we cut our murder rate in half
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 08:32 PM
Jan 2014

at the same time we saw the widespread liberalization of gun laws, widespread adoption of shall issue concealed carry, and an explosion in the popularity of semiautomatic rifles like the AR-15.

If you want to focus on individual states over short periods of time then knock yourself out - just be honest enough to admit that as a nation we are enjoying historically low levels of gun violence. It would be even lower if we could reduce our persistently steady suicide rate.

The Magistrate

(95,247 posts)
17. You Said Something Could Not Be Found, Sir: It Took Almost No Time To Find It
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 08:41 PM
Jan 2014

You cited a specific state yourself, I replied with another specific state.

I am well aware rates of crime over-all have been in decline for years. But that does not mean that they might not have declined even further had other policies been pursued in some areas. Rates of homicide might well have been bouyed up to some degree by rising rates of gun ownership, and be above what they might have been had rates of gun ownership remained what they were of even declined from that.

I agree that the number of suicides committed with guns is very high, and given the efficacy of a gun for the purpose, it is obvious there would be fewer such suicides if fewer people owned guns, and further that a significant proportion of suicides which are committed with guns, might not be successfully pursued, or even actually attempted, without so efficient a tool for the purpose ready to hand. A number of the guns employed for suicide were certainly originally obtained in the belief they were needed for self-defense.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
19. So what is your solution to this "mis-perception"?
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 08:43 PM
Jan 2014

we can't restrict civil liberties just because certain people don't think the right way. Can we?

The Magistrate

(95,247 posts)
23. It Is Always Healthy, Sir, For A Society To Shame And Condemn Cowardice
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 08:51 PM
Jan 2014

It is never sound policy to cater to cowardice, and allow the people who display cowardly fears to set the social tone.

People who, when at no appreciable risk of harm, imagine themselves to need deadly force on their person just to face the world each day, display cowardice of the highest water.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
27. Since I do not own guns for self defense
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 09:47 PM
Jan 2014

But rather own several AR-15s for competitive target shooting, happy to see I have nothing to be ashamed of. Thanks.

The Magistrate

(95,247 posts)
29. A Hobby Is A Good Thing To Have, Sir
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 12:25 AM
Jan 2014

I build things like this, myself....



This is a Caudron G.VI of Escadrille C575, operating in Lebanon shortly after the end of WWI. It is scratch-built, in 1/72 scale.



This is an Albatros D.V of Jasta 4, brought down intact in the English lines in July of 1917. It is from a kit, in the same scale.



This is a 'Nieuport Scout' of 60 Sqdn., its pilot, 2nd Lt. C. S. Hall. was killed in it April 7, 1917, just short of his nineteenth birthday. Also from a kit, in the same scale.



This is a Boeing F4B-4 of VMF 10 at San Diego, early 1932. Also from a kit in the same scale.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
30. I recently spent a delightful day at the Air and Space Museum annex at Dulles airport
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 07:25 AM
Jan 2014

I love aviation history and airplanes, especially WWII bombers. Last summer I had the once in a lifetime experience of having a B-17 fly low over my house as it came in to land.

Beautiful models by the way.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
18. We did it mostly by cutting the environmental lead levels by a lot more than half
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 08:41 PM
Jan 2014

There's some good evidence that lowering lead levels is leading to lowering of violence levels in many nations, not just the USA.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
25. It's evident that you have a theory you'd like to put forth
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 08:56 PM
Jan 2014

Might as well go ahead and tell us what it is you think.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
28. More guns = more gun deaths is a constant theme here
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 09:49 PM
Jan 2014

That despite the actual facts that say otherwise.

But I was rude to answer you as I did - I apologize.

 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
24. Ugh are we really so dumb
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 08:55 PM
Jan 2014

We need a study to figure out that most of chicagos violence is gang related and that they tend to retaliate against each other?
When we allow universities to spend money on studies like this is it any wonder no one can afford college?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Violence Significantly In...