General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThey’re Fast-Tracking the Future, TPP Style – But We Can Stop Them
Theyre Fast-Tracking the Future, TPP Style But We Can Stop Them
January 24, 2014
In this insightful analysis of TPP negotiation records released by WikiLeaks, doctoral candidate Gabriel Michael illustrates the ways in which the United States has been at odds with the rest of the world or, at a minimum, has held substantially different positions from other nations in a number of key areas.
This graph from Michael summarizes the relative positions of the nations involved:
When it comes to this deal, We Are Not the World. As Mr. Michael notes, the TPP is anything but an agreement amongst like-minded countries, as the United States trade representative has described it.
The U.S. differs most sharply from the other nations on matters of intellectual property. The WikiLeaks documents show that every other country in the negotiations stood against American intellectual property demands. But the U.S. also has significant disagreements with the other nations on matters of law, rulemaking, and the environment.Theres evidence that the United States is pushing back on climate change and resisting other forms of environmental protection. Sen. Elizabeth Warren has expressed concern that the United States may be attempting to restrict financial regulations, and has taken a position on the topic of tobacco.
President Obamas negotiators also fought for the right of corporations to sue foreign governments over their laws and regulations. Australia has objected to this provision on the grounds that it gives corporations equal status with independent nations but, as we will see, thats implicit in much of the TPP process.
Our government isnt just trying to push through a draconian treaty. Its working to make it even worse.
But why is the U.S. so sharply out of alignment with the other countries negotiating this treaty? Probably because its the nominal home of some of the worlds largest corporations. (Theyre nominally American because, although theyre typically run by Americans, they tend to employ most of their workforces and pay their taxes if at all in other nations.)
The U.S. negotiators hard-line positions conform closely to the interests of these nominally American corporations. Whether its Big Tobacco, Big Pharma, tech, Hollywood, major polluters like the oil companies, or risk-taking financial institutions on Wall Street, the American negotiators have been fighting for their interests while disregarding the interests of the taxpayers who pay their salaries.
Although these negotiators were appointed by Democrats, their positions dont seem to differ from those taken by Republican Administrations. That reflects a political system which is increasingly being corrupted by campaign cash, and by the post-political work opportunities which American-run multinationals can offer sitting politicians.
Its not unfair to say that the flaws in this treaty reflect the flaws in our democracy.
Its easy to understand why President Obama and his team want to fast-track this deal. Not only are its provisions unpopular with the general public, but any changes that Congress might make would then have to be negotiated with all of the treaty participants. And that list of participants isnt restricted to the nations who will become this treaty signatories if it is passed.
The real negotiations, the toughest give-and-take, has almost certainly not been among sovereign nations but among sovereign corporations. Thats why hundreds of corporate representatives saw this treaty before any elected representatives did. In many cases, they were the ones doing the wheeling and dealing. Rice producers, dairy corporations, financiers, corporate beef, Big Pharma, and manufacturers of textiles, footwear, and technology
they had to negotiate with their governments, and perhaps with each other as well.
Heres food for thought: Fast-tracking could become the model for a new and profoundly subversive model of governance one in which elected government becomes little more than an afterthought to corporate-backed deal-making. Its not hard to imagine a dystopian future where this becomes the norm.
In the right hands it might make a good science-fiction novel: a world in which individual governments, treaty organizations and even the United Nations have been replaced by a new governing body comprised entirely of corporate representatives. Think of it as a World Financial Parliament or a Global House of Corporate Lords, where the only voting the rest of us do happens when we watch a movie, play a video game, or take a prescription medication.
And even when we do, we dont really have much of a choice at all.
But the fight isnt over. Congress is reluctant to pass this unpopular bill, especially in an election year. That makes public pushback especially important right now.
-------------------------
More of this article and other articles about TPP at Campaign for America's Future:
http://ourfuture.org/20140124/theyre-fast-tracking-the-future-tpp-style-but-we-can-stop-them
villager
(26,001 posts)...Administrations."
Yup.
One big happy tent of a party.
For corporations.
for exposure!!
Thanks!!
Progressive dog
(6,904 posts)internal competitors. I think objections to the TPP should be about stuff that harms the US, not that helps it's foreign competitors.
polichick
(37,152 posts)and resisting other forms of environmental protection."
FUCKERS!
pampango
(24,692 posts)But many of those proposals are opposed by most or all of the other Pacific Rim nations working on the deal, including Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Mexico, Chile, Japan, Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei, Vietnam and Peru. Developing Asian countries, in particular, have long resisted outside efforts to enforce strong environmental controls, arguing that they could hurt their growing economies.
The report appears to indicate that the United States is losing many of those fights ...
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/15/us/politics/administration-is-seen-as-retreating-on-environment-in-talks-on-pacific-trade.html
Weird how polar opposites two views of the same report can be.
polichick
(37,152 posts)wasn't surrounded by secrecy, citizens would know what's going on.
What happened to the promised transparency?
polichick
(37,152 posts)at The Campaign for Americas Future.
There was a time when Obama and Jones were on the same page.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)I don't remember why he left the administration, though.
polichick
(37,152 posts)past comments and affiliations.