General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRand Paul says women owe their success to Aqua Buddha!
just kidding! But seriously, when will one of these reporters ask him about the Aqua Buddha incident?? I mean, if Monica Lewinsky needs to be discussed, then surely so does Aqua Buddha.
Initech
(100,075 posts)Blue Owl
(50,373 posts)Berlum
(7,044 posts)dchill
(38,492 posts)IOKIYAR.
okaawhatever
(9,462 posts)corporate bosses want a no-taxes-for-corporations and no-worker-protections President. They will be on strict orders not to rock the boat. And while Rachel Maddow or someone similar will have compelling evidence and facts to show what a slimeball this guy is, it will be seen by 1-2 million out of 300 million.
Investigating Rand Paul's history with women would likely prove fascinating (in a desperate "I'll be watching you" kind of way) but likely won't be investigated by the main stream media. Hopefully the msm will realize they are likely to face a Democratic President and Congress for the next few years and will stop being the propaganda arm for the Republican party.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)he went on and on about "poor poor Monica Lewinsky"....as if she was some sort of "innocent girl". In fact he kept on calling her a "young girl" even though he admitted she was 20 yrs old...never realizing he just insulted every 20 yr old WOMAN....by calling them young "girls" instead of young women.
stg81
(351 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)though their "we are not waging war on women" I guess doesn't extend to Rand Paul's "young girls".
Scuba
(53,475 posts)... for his father's racism and his staffer's head-stomping.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)but no "war on women" ....nope NOT at ALL!
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)Gothmog
(145,231 posts)If he runs for POTUS, he will not be able to stand the scrutiny.