General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMicrosoft reportedly planning to go back to Windows desktop default
February 2, 2014, 2:10 PM
While much of the recent chatter surrounding Microsoft Corp. may be centered around the successor to Chief Executive Steve Ballmer, another change may be in the works for software giants Windows 8.1 operating system to cater to core users.
Recently, reports indicate Microsoft MSFT -2.37% is planning to update Windows 8.1 by having the system boot to a desktop option by default, something traditional desktop users have been wanting.
This past June, Microsoft announced it would allow users an option to boot directly toward a more traditional desktop interface, but now that option may become the default, replacing the default of booting to the Metro tile-based interface that was meant to capitalize on the rise of tablet use.
First leaked by Russian blogger Wzor, the shift indicates a move by Microsoft to cater to its bread-and-butter clientele, keyboard and mouse users.
http://blogs.marketwatch.com/thetell/2014/02/02/microsoft-reportedly-planning-to-go-back-to-windows-desktop-default/
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)Start8 application from Startdock, and other similar programs did what Microsoft should have done in the first place
They are still fortunate that Apple has failed to attract most business users because the cost of their hardware is too much, and the business applications have never caught on, especially compared to Microsoft Office
jmowreader
(50,567 posts)Microsoft Office for Windows was ported from the Mac, and the Mac version is still sold. The DOS version of Word was hideous, and I don't remember if they ever had a DOS spreadsheet.
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)PDF takes you into metro mode. In fact for the 90% of business that doesn't have touch screens, doesn't want their desktop to look like an IPAD device when doing normal business activities, default back to Windows 7 for those folks.
The windows 8 interface was an inefficient interface for those on non-touch desktop type devices.
In addition, they should fix the start menu for these desktop uses, so it is back to Windows 7.
The 8.1 start menu implementation was a half-assed attempt to correct things. They should have implemented something like the Start8 application.
Then people could have rolled their own interface to their liking
KoKo
(84,711 posts)Start Menu.
I've read that people don't want to give up XP and I thought this might be hopeful news since XP won't be supported after April this year. But, reading the replies it seems that what they are suggesting won't be a real return to what was familiar...but, more of a "tweak?"
I'm an XP user and was dreading eventually having to upgrade...so I was hopeful.
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)jsr
(7,712 posts)which is now embedded in the OS.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)it dies. I have 7 on my Laptop...and that's a newer machine...so hopefully I'll get a few more years and by then they will have either fixed Win 8 or I'll go with Apple.
I'm not a fan of cloud, especially with NSA Spying. Although they probably already have my info in cloud...I don't plan to give them any more info willingly.
jsr
(7,712 posts)Almost every "improvement" they've made has been garbage - designed to raid your wallet and hold people captive.
Xithras
(16,191 posts)When most people say "I want desktop mode back", they really mean that they want desktop mode with the old popup Start Menu interface. Even in Windows 8.1, the "Start" button in the new optional Desktop mode simply brings up the Metro window again...because the Metro window IS the new Start menu. Microsoft making desktop mode the new default screen won't change that.
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)or by the company that makes the application Start8 which lets users roll their own interface, either metro or Windows 7.
If a third party can do it for 5 bucks, you would have thought MSFT would have caught on
Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)software
If I am mistaken, then please tell me how you configure it for windows 7
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)If you want to boot straight to the desktop you easily can. It is nice that they are making this the default, though.
Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)I have never found that screen to be useful so I bypass it.
randome
(34,845 posts)That's a major annoyance for some who prefer to be thinking about their work, not their OS.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]All things in moderation, including moderation.[/center][/font][hr]
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)but I like to have the start screen open on a second monitor. It can show you some useful info and some metro apps come in handy.
last1standing
(11,709 posts)Will they be able to withstand the mistake of releasing Windows 8? I'd guess yes, but they're not the monolith they once were. With Apple and Android taking up the lion's share of the tablet market while PC sales shrink, Microsoft may find it very hard to maneuver as the once did by merely buying up the competition or marketing a lesser product with better advertising.
That said, I use Windows 7, which is little more than a remake of Vista, every day and find it incredibly stable and responsive. Perhaps if MS looks to its own history, it will revamp 8 and market it under a different name. I wonder if that will be enough this time.
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)to do it.
Apple has other issues. They should really be pushing to get into business arena, which means their costs need to come down. They had a perfect opportunity to do it with Vista, and now again with Windows 8
last1standing
(11,709 posts)Business capable operating systems require far more resources and flexibility than Apple can offer. When I was in corporate IT, the few Apple systems I had to deal with were constantly having issues because the OS is in no way ready for commercial use. Also, do to the proprietary nature of Apple systems, the computers weren't very expandable or flexible enough to suit the differing needs of the various businesses and their applications. Also, as you state, the cost of purchasing and repairs was insane.
I think Apple will be looking at the same problems as Microsoft in a few years (or sooner). They are being outmaneuvered by Google's Android in the sales department and can only count on more and more clever advertising to keep them in the market. Yet, as more people start realizing that Apple offers little over Android other than "cool kid" niche marketing, I believe they will falter, again.
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)are already being outmaneuvered by Android. They are going to have to be a lot more innovative in the mobile area than they have been recently, that is for sure.
randome
(34,845 posts)But even there, Microsoft managed to clutter the taskbar, changing for the sake of change. I find it extremely annoying to have a 2 panel taskbar that offers me nothing.
Then they decided to place folders at the bottom of the stack instead of at top. I suppose they consider that 'technology'.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Precision and concision. That's the game.[/center][/font][hr]
Bandit
(21,475 posts)I hate windows 8...HATE IT...HATE IT...HATE IT
wandy
(3,539 posts)If it is how explorer is presenting a view to you, that is easy to fix.
randome
(34,845 posts)Menu folders are, by default, placed at the bottom of the stack. How original of Microsoft to have switched this for us. I'm sure there was reams of user data to justify it.
I drive everything on my PC through the menu system because I am very organized. I always work with a clean desk, no matter how hard Microsoft tries to make that. And now with 8.1, they just say, 'Fuck it! Throw everything on the desktop and let God sort it out!'
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"If you're bored then you're boring." -Harvey Danger[/center][/font][hr]
wandy
(3,539 posts)You can get used to anything, I guess.
Although I have not messed with this recently, somewhere long ago I solved a problem for someone with Classic Shell.
http://www.classicshell.net/
It might be worth looking into.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)M$ is and has been above the law, that's how it became a "monolith". If you had started M$ and done exactly as Gates & Co. did, you would have been, at best, bankrupt, and very possibly in jail, because you do not come from the right class.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Just because we have smartphones doesn't mean I want my PC/laptop to look like a hopelessly cluttered smart phone. We don't all use touchscreens on everything.
7 I still far superior to 8.
madokie
(51,076 posts)when you install it on your computer its like you give your computer a shot of adrenaline. No worries with needing a lot of add ons that use up your resources like anti-virus or anti-malware programs. Turn the computer on and in less than a minute it is up and ready to do whatever you want to do with it
And its free if you choose to not contribute anything towards development.
Grey
(1,581 posts)I mean which version of Linex do you prefer, I am still using XP on the old PC.
madokie
(51,076 posts)On my desktop I run ubuntu 10.04.4 one my wife's laptop I have mint 15.
For most people starting off Ubuntu or Mint is the best way to go. You can download and burn a copy and try it to see if you like it before you install it. For a long time I had a double boot system with XP but after I got comfortable with linux I reformated and just install the linux version I use.
Logical
(22,457 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)Really not any different from going to a new version of windows when they upgrade it. In fact its easier.
What version of linux do you use or do you?
Be interesting to see what your answer to this is
Logical
(22,457 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)Why do you say you have to be a techie to use ubuntu
Logical
(22,457 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)I've yet to run into anything that didn't work right out of the box.
I don't think you know what you're talking about
Logical
(22,457 posts)Chan790
(20,176 posts)I'm a computer scientist, worked in a university computing department and I can barely make it run some things.
Everything that requires WINE is a PITA...and most anything worth running requires WINE as very few software publishers design or publish anything for Linux.
Logical
(22,457 posts)ruin their fantasy!
steve2470
(37,457 posts)I've used it and it does require more technical skills than regular Windoze. With some installs I've been lucky and everything worked out of the box. However, I've also had installs where my NIC card wouldn't work and one install where Ubuntu didn't like my motherboard. I've used everything from Fedora to Ubuntu to Mandriva to the old Mandrake to SuSe. Linux is undeniably better on the security front, partially because it forces you to use your password for every major change. It's a great OS.
Hutzpa
(11,461 posts)you better check your Ubuntu or Mint to make sure your drivers are from the right source.
I will not recommend Linux to anyone that is not technical because you will be handing it over to someone else to use for you.
madokie
(51,076 posts)I've installed a passel of Ubuntu and Mint operating systems to a shitpot of computers and I've yet to run into a problem. whether it be an old computer as I have or a brand spanking shiny new one like most have been. Linux does not allow anything on a Linux operating system that is not vetted by Linux without your agreeing to allow it. I have not seen nor heard of anyone who has tried Ubuntu or Mint that has had a problem with malware, spyware, viruses or anything like undocumented drivers. No need for any of that.
I run AutoCad 2000 on my linux machine using Wine and it really wasn't that difficult to do either. In fact Acad 2000 runs better using Wine than it does using compatibility mode in XP. (Acad 2000 was written for win98 btw) Give it a try to install Acad2000 into a winblows7 machine and you'll be pulling your hair out by the time you get it up and running. I know I've done it.
I come from the old world of DOS where bad command or file name and the blue screen of death was the norm. Where 640 mbs of memory was all and you needed two floppies to boot too and about 10 minutes of your time with your computer grinding away like a threshing machine on its last leg, then the 10 meg hard drive came out and boy o boy what an improvement that was. I've yet to have a crash with any of the Linux installions I've been part of or on my own machines. The only time I've had to worry with a driver was for an old from years gone by dot matrix printer
Everything you need to do anything you want with the computer is there for the taking. Free of charge if you don't want to contribute I might add.
Gimp has Photoshop beat all to hell, Open Office has word beat as well, same for Libre Office. Don't even get me started on Firefox compared to Outlook Express. LOL
The person here who doesn't know what they're talking about damn sure ain't me
Almost all servers are running Linux, google you name it, the ISS runs a Linux machine finally too because they really need a stable operating system. That's the reason they gave when they made the switch.
My only regret with Linux is I waited as long as I did to make the change.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)Berlum
(7,044 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)Berlum
(7,044 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)Berlum
(7,044 posts)You can doubt the reality of the news in the OP. And you can doubt the reality that MS sucks. You can doubt all of reality, or you can doubt half of it.
But no matter, your doubt still amounts to little more than a bucket of woo.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)they use their psychic powers and post to the internet directly from their mind.
Sid
lpbk2713
(42,769 posts)The gnomes of Redmond wanted to fix something that wasn't broke.
Bad move.
I have Win7 on my laptop and office PCs but I prefer the XP that is on my home PC.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)I HATE H.A.T.E. Windows 8. NOTHING is where it's supposed to be. Everything I need I have to do a flippin' Google Search.
randome
(34,845 posts)But they don't do that because they want everyone in the world to think the way they do. It's insanity.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]If you're not committed to anything, you're just taking up space.
Gregory Peck, Mirage (1965)[/center][/font][hr]
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Fuck transparency, icon shadows, animations, mouseover hover effects, candy-colored crap. Give me classic theme, classic start menu, classic control panel, classic explorer.
If I wanted an apple product, I'd sell a kidney to buy one.
Me and my three monitors are happy, thankyaverramuch.
TroglodyteScholar
(5,477 posts)...to add a step in the installer that offers "Desktop" experience, "Modern" experience, or "decide for me" which would then detect your display's capabilities...?
This is NOT fucking rocket science, Microsoft. If you're smart, when you bully people into something new you'll make sure they think they had some choice in the matter.
MH1
(17,608 posts)Initech
(100,107 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)It worked for me.
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)for gaming. Otherwise I'd still be on XP.
I don't know what genius at MS thought that putting a tablet or phone OS on a PC was a good idea but.. Epic Fail...
bravenak
(34,648 posts)My mom still can't find her start button. I have to drive to her house every time she wants to use it.
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)have it sent to me with XP.. They included the CD for Win 7, when I was ready to switch.. I have not done so yet..
KoKo
(84,711 posts)my partner here would really need...as he has a Toshiba now...but, he's going to need to replace soon and has 7...but does not want 8 or 8.1 or any of it.
Did you order it online? I would urge him to do it now if there's a place he can get another Toshiba with what he wants! I don't think he should wait...but buy it as a back up ...in case... XP won't be supported but he could get a couple or more years out of 7...
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)I also had them install Office.. It was more pricey than I could have gotten at a store, but it had what I wanted.. It's this version..(check your inbox)
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)"The team chose Ubuntu as the operating system"
http://insights.ubuntu.com/resources/interviews/ubuntu-powered-obama-for-america-success/
WillowTree
(5,325 posts)I bought a new laptop just as Windows 8 was coming out so I'd have a fresh, new Windows 7 machine that'll last me awhile when the one I already had gives up the ghost. As someone else said up-thread somewhere, 7 Professional has been just all kinds of stable and I had a bad feeling about 8. Turned out to be a good decision.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)To upgrade, you have to go to the Microsoft Store link on your Metro screen and do a search for Windows 8.1. This M$ link further explains it: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-8/update-from-windows-8-tutorial
Once you upgrade to Win8.1, you can enable auto-boot-to-desktop-mode by right clicking on the Taskbar, click Properties, click Navigation tab, then go to the Start Screen section, and check the box marked "When I sign in....go to the Desktop instead of Start". Reboot and that change is in place.
The other major change people want (the Win7 style classic Start button) can be achieved by going to http://www.classicshell.net/ and downloading their app which will give you the classic Start button again. With these two changes, you can avoid the hassles of that dreadful Metro screen from now on.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)first thing I did was install Classic Shell and then spend 3 hours tweaking it to act right. It looks and feels like 7 and people are amazed.