General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEvery Crisis Is The 'Biggest Test' Of Obama's Presidency
The 'Biggest Tests' Of Obama's Presidency
WASHINGTON -- As Russia heightens its military activity in Ukraine, President Barack Obama's handling of the crisis is arguably "the biggest test of his presidency."
At least, that's what Politico Magazine had to say on Saturday, thus keeping alive the media's tradition of dubbing every major obstacle before Obama his "biggest" or "greatest" test. The use of the phrase has not been limited to foreign crises in Ukraine, Syria or Libya, but has also been bestowed upon domestic challenges such as the health care law and reducing the debt.
The Huffington Post compiled the other "biggest tests" of Obama's presidency, listed below in chronological order:
The financial crisis of 2007-08
Obama was confronted with his first "biggest test" before he even became president. The Daily Democrat wrote in 2008 that "Should Obama win
sorting out the economy is going to be the biggest test of Obamas presidency." (Spoiler alert: He won.)
Mumbai terror attacks, November 2008
Days after terrorists attacked India's business capital Mumbai on Nov. 26, 2008, the News Tribune observed that "Obamas agenda abroad to build new alliances will likely end up being one of the biggest tests of his presidency."
more
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/01/obama-biggest-tests_n_4881977.html?utm_hp_ref=politics
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,648 posts)Starting with Faux Noise. Obama was also the "most liberal Democrat in the Senate." Following several others, I might add.
I can only hope people get tired of the over dramatization of the news. The "Cry Wolf" factor makes it nearly impossible to respond properly to a real crisis.
jsr
(7,712 posts)frazzled
(18,402 posts)It's a crisis for the Western world (and I wouldn't be all that surprised if some Asian countries chimed in as well.)
The headline in today's (print) NYT was: "Rebuff to Obama." This is not Obama's conflict, except to the extent that the US is considered the prime player in any world event. What about Merkel, Cameron, Hollande, et al.? This entire thing began (partly) as a response to the European Union/Russian split in Ukrainian interests.
Fortunately, the new headline in the Times is "Western Powers Scramble to Respond to Growing Crisis" (although if you click on that link, it leads you to an article entitled "Ukraine Puts Troops on High Alert, Threatening War).
... In Britain, Prime Minister David Cameron said that there can be no excuse for outside military intervention in Ukraine.
Canada said it was recalling its ambassador from Moscow and, like the United States, suspending preparations for the G-8 meeting.
At the United Nations, the Security Council on Saturday held an emergency meeting on Ukraine for the second time in two days.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/03/world/europe/ukraine.html?hp
tularetom
(23,664 posts)As of now he's handled everyone of these "biggest tests" admirably.
But, ya know, hope springs eternal, and they can always hope he screws up. If he does, they have nailed him in advance by labeling each "crisis" his biggest test.
And if that happens we'll never hear the end of it.
Fortunately, nobody who lives outside the Washington beltway pays any attention to politico.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)I can hear their talons clicking...
and whatever Obama chooses to do or not, they will squawk and peck, peck and squawk about what a horrible and backstabbing and incompetent man he is.