Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
2. Stand until disarmed--they will be told to leave Crimea then, I guess.
Mon Mar 3, 2014, 08:20 PM
Mar 2014

If they don't, probably they'll be arrested under Crimean authority and held in jail or detained in some way, or driven out.

KeepItReal

(7,769 posts)
4. Who or what is "Crimean authority"?
Mon Mar 3, 2014, 08:23 PM
Mar 2014

Do they trump the Ukrainian government (such as it is right now) these troops report to?

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
5. I think they're somewhat autonomous. They can make up the laws as they go along
Mon Mar 3, 2014, 08:25 PM
Mar 2014

anyway--they already have when they "invited" Russia to invade.

KeepItReal

(7,769 posts)
8. Russians seized Crimean airfields before anyone asked for their assistance
Mon Mar 3, 2014, 08:32 PM
Mar 2014

These pro Russian folks in Crimea aren't all autonomous methinks

KeepItReal

(7,769 posts)
10. Could've been Spetsnaz or mercs
Mon Mar 3, 2014, 08:43 PM
Mar 2014

Either way they had orders from Putin

Controlling airfields means only Russian aircraft into or out of Crimea. Ukrainian forces would have to fight their way in to relieve their own forces there.

Once I saw that happen, the tables were turned in Moscows favor.

okaawhatever

(9,462 posts)
12. A clear violation of the Vienna Convention. Which is yet another issue. Also, the Crimea is an
Mon Mar 3, 2014, 08:50 PM
Mar 2014

autonomous Republic under Ukraine. It is not independent. They do not have the authority to "invite" Russia to invade. Also, the leases Russia has with Ukraine on the base states that the forces can't engage in military action. Only self-defense, which is one of the reasons Putin kept using that lie. There will certainly be legal implications for those who left the Russian base and engaged in military type behavior, such as the armed checkpoints. It will probably be military or international law. Putin will keep the self-defense meme going but the longer this goes without violence, the less likely it will be for him to use it.

okaawhatever

(9,462 posts)
14. I said Vienna, but I meant Geneva. Vienna is still floating around in my head because of the
Mon Mar 3, 2014, 08:58 PM
Mar 2014

diplomatic row with the Indian ambassador woman who was arrested for forging the visa documents. (all of that fell under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations).

The Geneva convention played a big part in all the gitmo issues.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
3. Nothing yet, and pray the rest of the world can reason with Putin.
Mon Mar 3, 2014, 08:21 PM
Mar 2014

I do not think there will be armed conflict; the solution will probably end up being Crimea back to Russia at least.

Warpy

(111,257 posts)
6. If they're smart, to stand down and bide their time
Mon Mar 3, 2014, 08:28 PM
Mar 2014

Taking territory and holding it are two different things, as the US military well knows.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What should Ukraine order...