Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

global1

(25,246 posts)
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 02:07 AM Mar 2014

So If 9/11 Never Happened - How Would BushCo Have Justified Invading Iraq.....

Just watched Why We Did It on MSNBC. Found out we invaded Iraq for 'oil'. Hmmmmm..........Really!!!!! Though they told us differently at the time - we all knew.

My question is - if 9/11 never occurred - how would BushCo have justified invading Iraq? What would have been their reason? Would it still have been WMD? Would we have believed them if that is what they would have been selling us - if 9/11 never occurred?

48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So If 9/11 Never Happened - How Would BushCo Have Justified Invading Iraq..... (Original Post) global1 Mar 2014 OP
Al Qaeda and Bin Laden saved them some time. Archae Mar 2014 #1
Ask PNAC. They were demanding Clinton invade Iraq long before 9/11 Pretzel_Warrior Mar 2014 #2
Dunno. elleng Mar 2014 #3
It would have been pretty much the same sell jberryhill Mar 2014 #4
if 9/11 was a fabricated charade seveneyes Mar 2014 #10
I agree... Adrahil Mar 2014 #11
Now you have the real reason for the invasion of Iraq, the threat of killing his daddy was over the Thinkingabout Mar 2014 #28
he would have used the famous: orleans Mar 2014 #5
I think speculating about if the terrorst Jenoch Mar 2014 #6
So how is it offensive? aquart Mar 2014 #7
Exactly. They NEEDED 9/11. PeteSelman Mar 2014 #8
We must keep dragging these words (and intentions) from the "dust-bin of history. New. Pearl. Harbor chimpymustgo Mar 2014 #37
Bush didn't need 9/11 to get his tax cuts for the rich RandiFan1290 Mar 2014 #9
I wnat that question answered before I die malaise Mar 2014 #12
I don't know...but I think they would've had a much more difficult time selling the invasion deutsey Mar 2014 #13
Yes, I remember the Anti-Globalization movement. CJCRANE Mar 2014 #15
So, where is it now? ChisolmTrailDem Mar 2014 #39
Everything changed on...you know when. CJCRANE Mar 2014 #43
"Civil war" is always a good pretense. It worked in Libya. nt Romulox Mar 2014 #14
bu$hco never justified going into iraq....they had nothing to do w/911 spanone Mar 2014 #16
They spouted off about Saddam, 9/11 and Al Qaeda repeatedly CJCRANE Mar 2014 #17
I remember. They were very careful Mariana Mar 2014 #18
They didn't need to overtly connect Saddam to 9/11. The MSM did that for them. nt ChisolmTrailDem Mar 2014 #42
False flag of some sort. CANDO Mar 2014 #19
Agree -- options in order of frequency of use: #1 False Flag KurtNYC Mar 2014 #31
I don't see how it would have made a difference Recursion Mar 2014 #20
Oh, I don't know..... Saddam has WMD's? Nye Bevan Mar 2014 #21
How do you explain this... CJCRANE Mar 2014 #22
Yeah, they certainly tried to muddy the waters Nye Bevan Mar 2014 #35
The "official" justification for invading Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 malthaussen Mar 2014 #23
After 9/11 some members of the Bush team CJCRANE Mar 2014 #25
Without 9/11, the Senate doesn't go repub in 2002. n2doc Mar 2014 #24
9/11 Token Republican Mar 2014 #26
So where did the political will come from CJCRANE Mar 2014 #27
The elder Bush worked hard to get Saddam in power.. Thinkingabout Mar 2014 #32
Not sure that's right Token Republican Mar 2014 #34
Bush worked for the CIA and Saddam was in exile in Egypt and Bush was pulling for Saddam. Thinkingabout Mar 2014 #36
BREAKING: Another Republican agrees with Republicans. News at 11:00. Electric Monk Mar 2014 #40
"bellicose threats and actions towards his neighbors" Chan790 Mar 2014 #29
EVERYTHING changed the night of the 2000 Selection. benld74 Mar 2014 #30
Administration Quotes Linking 9/11 to Iraq Ichingcarpenter Mar 2014 #33
thank you for that compilation grasswire Mar 2014 #38
Watch 911 Press for truth- by DUer Paul Thompson Ichingcarpenter Mar 2014 #41
they would have had an almost impossible time selling the war to the American people 2pooped2pop Mar 2014 #44
Palin missed this one too, "In what respect Charlie?"...and I think it's relevant to the OP Sheepshank Mar 2014 #45
But the preemptive strike doctrine CJCRANE Mar 2014 #47
From my reading, it wasn't a doctrine for only 9-11 Sheepshank Mar 2014 #48
They had plenty of other propaganda techniques ready to employ Corruption Inc Mar 2014 #46

Archae

(46,327 posts)
1. Al Qaeda and Bin Laden saved them some time.
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 02:09 AM
Mar 2014

They would have created a reason, 9-11 just speeded things up.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
4. It would have been pretty much the same sell
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 02:20 AM
Mar 2014

The weapons of mass destruction thing.

Because if 9/11 was a fabricated charade to provide a pretext for invading Iraq, then it is amazing that these guys decided to make it look like Iraq had nothing to do with it.

 

seveneyes

(4,631 posts)
10. if 9/11 was a fabricated charade
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 07:53 AM
Mar 2014

There are many things the US government will do to individuals or small groups that are unscrupulous. What happened on 911 is not something that our leaders, or their minions could do without someone divulging it. It's also not something that any players in our past/present government would have ever even considered doing to our own citizens. IMHO.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
11. I agree...
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 08:07 AM
Mar 2014

.... They would have waited for another of Saddam's foolish attempts to violate the No-Fly zone and taken it form there. Saddam tried to kill Dubya's Daddy. He was gonna invade one way or another.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
28. Now you have the real reason for the invasion of Iraq, the threat of killing his daddy was over the
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 12:35 PM
Mar 2014

Line. The real result was Iraq kept Iran under wraps.and Iran proceeded to work on their nuclear weapon without controls.

orleans

(34,051 posts)
5. he would have used the famous:
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 02:20 AM
Mar 2014

"christ! was i drunk last night!"

on edit: like he did with everything else

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
6. I think speculating about if the terrorst
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 02:55 AM
Mar 2014

attacks that occured on 911 did not happen is offensive to the people who survived those attacks (and their family and friends). I would guess they have thought about the same thing every single day since September, 11, 2001.

aquart

(69,014 posts)
7. So how is it offensive?
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 03:50 AM
Mar 2014

Were you in New York? Were you anywhere near it? Did you breathe the dust of the dead?

THERE IS NOTHING SACRED ABOUT MASS MURDER.

Everyone left alive in lower Manhattan survived those attacks and the aftermath of poisonous air. The only offensive speculation, to me, comes from the mouthy idiots who think two jets full of fuel weren't enough to bring the towers down. I would be happy to pull their tongues out and knot them.

PeteSelman

(1,508 posts)
8. Exactly. They NEEDED 9/11.
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 07:30 AM
Mar 2014

And, oh so conveniently, they got it. Coincidence? I think not.

"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor" - PNAC

chimpymustgo

(12,774 posts)
37. We must keep dragging these words (and intentions) from the "dust-bin of history. New. Pearl. Harbor
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 01:01 PM
Mar 2014

Never forget, people. Much of the evidence is right before our very eyes.

RandiFan1290

(6,232 posts)
9. Bush didn't need 9/11 to get his tax cuts for the rich
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 07:39 AM
Mar 2014

in 4 short months after the closest election in history.

He only needed wimpy "democrats"

deutsey

(20,166 posts)
13. I don't know...but I think they would've had a much more difficult time selling the invasion
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 10:20 AM
Mar 2014

In the summer leading up to 9/11, there was a growing groundswell of dissatisfaction with Bush. There was what was looking to be a huge Anti-Capitalist Convergence being organized for DC at the end of September, and protestors were planning to surround the White House peacefully.

I think if 9/11 had not happened, Bush and Co. would have trumped up some excuse to invade Iraq, but based on what I remember of the growing energy around this protest, they would have encountered much more resistance.

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
43. Everything changed on...you know when.
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 02:42 PM
Mar 2014

The GWOT took precedence and everyone just seemed to fall in line for a while.

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
17. They spouted off about Saddam, 9/11 and Al Qaeda repeatedly
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 10:46 AM
Mar 2014

in the same sentence. It's pretty well documented.

Surveys showed that most of the American troops in Iraq thought Saddam was responsilbe for 9/11.

Mariana

(14,856 posts)
18. I remember. They were very careful
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 11:45 AM
Mar 2014

never to say directly that Saddam Hussein was responsible for 9/11. But most people don't listen that carefully. At the time, I remember thinking that Goebbels would be in awe of Bush's speechwriters.

KurtNYC

(14,549 posts)
31. Agree -- options in order of frequency of use: #1 False Flag
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 12:42 PM
Mar 2014

#2 Historic claim to land / border dispute (Falkland islands)
#3 Succession / independence

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
20. I don't see how it would have made a difference
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 11:52 AM
Mar 2014

They'd just pick some border infraction in the Northern zone.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
21. Oh, I don't know..... Saddam has WMD's?
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 11:52 AM
Mar 2014

As far as I remember, 9/11 was the justification for Afghanistan while WMDs (and not 9/11) were the justification for Iraq.

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
22. How do you explain this...
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 12:16 PM
Mar 2014

"85 percent of US troops think Saddam was involved with 9/11"

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/02/28/190483/-85-percent-of-US-troops-think-Saddam-was-involved-with-9-11

The wide-ranging poll also shows that 58% of those serving in country say the U.S. mission in Iraq is clear in their minds, while 42% said it is either somewhat or very unclear to them, that they have no understanding of it at all, or are unsure. While 85% said the U.S. mission is mainly "to retaliate for Saddam's role in the 9-11 attacks," 77% said they also believe the main or a major reason for the war was "to stop Saddam from protecting al Qaeda in Iraq."

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
35. Yeah, they certainly tried to muddy the waters
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 12:52 PM
Mar 2014

and exploit people's ignorance. But even if 9/11 had not happened I think that W was determined to (as he saw it) finish the job that his dad had not completed.

malthaussen

(17,194 posts)
23. The "official" justification for invading Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 12:20 PM
Mar 2014

It was about violation of treaty accords and WMD.

If the people on the ground thought otherwise, that's because they weren't paying attention to the party line.

Afghanistan, now, would have been tricky without 9/11.

-- Mal

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
25. After 9/11 some members of the Bush team
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 12:25 PM
Mar 2014

wanted to go straight in and attack Iraq.

It was only due to input from people like Colin Powell and Tony Blair that they decided to get Afghanistan out of the way first.

I'm surprised at the selective memories of some DUers.

I could link to info of all the Bushco statements about Saddam and Al Qaeda but I'll spare you that for now.

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
24. Without 9/11, the Senate doesn't go repub in 2002.
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 12:24 PM
Mar 2014

And shrub goes down in 2004 due to his crappy economy. They wouldn't have been able to start another war, unless some other major event took place.

 

Token Republican

(242 posts)
26. 9/11
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 12:30 PM
Mar 2014

Was not used as a justification.

Back in the 90s, it was all the rage in the media to show how Iraq was hiding its WMD.

The WMD argument was weak, very weak. I don't even think it was oil.

The rush to war was obvious, and it was obvious the claims of trying to enforce UN resolutions were weak at best.

I personally think it was about seeking revenge due to Saddam Hussein's attempted assassination of Bush the elder.

Oil was a fringe benefit.

The 9/11 link was used after the fact.

Congress failed here when it passed the Iraq war resolution. But it was popular to do back then, and politicians had a lot of short term gains in the polls. Until it became popular to do otherwise.

Can I borrow the puke bucket for my overall disgust please.

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
27. So where did the political will come from
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 12:33 PM
Mar 2014

for the war?

By "political will" I mean the support of the majority of Congress and the American people.

What changed to give momentum to that political will?

 

Token Republican

(242 posts)
34. Not sure that's right
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 12:50 PM
Mar 2014

I think you probably mean keeping him in power in the 1980s. I'm not aware of Bush I role in his initial rise in the 60s and 70s. I'm pretty sure he was more of a Soviet stooge then.

Things changed after the Iranian revolution, and Iraq went from being the real bad guy to our bad guy when Iran became our boogieman. Iraq was useful to the US as a proxy power to act as a counterweight to Iran.

We actually lost that when we invaded, as it created a power vacuum which Iran is exploiting.

All sides suck here.

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
29. "bellicose threats and actions towards his neighbors"
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 12:38 PM
Mar 2014

Combined with the same yellowcake lie.

The yellowcake is really the crux of their public justification, not 9/11. The agreements after the Gulf war forbid them uranium enrichment or research towards nuclear weapons. That alone would have been sufficient for them to obtain the support of Congress and foreign allies, if not the American public.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
33. Administration Quotes Linking 9/11 to Iraq
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 12:44 PM
Mar 2014

2002

"The regime has longstanding and continuing ties to terrorist groups, and there are Al Qaida terrorists inside Iraq." - George W. Bush Delivers Weekly Radio Address, White House (9/28/2002) - BushOnIraq.com

"We know that Iraq and al Qaeda have had high-level contacts that go back a decade. Some al Qaeda leaders who fled Afghanistan went to Iraq. These include one very senior al Qaeda leader who received medical treatment in Baghdad this year, and who has been associated with planning for chemical and biological attacks. We've learned that Iraq has trained al Qaeda members in bomb-making and poisons and deadly gases." - President Bush Outlines Iraqi Threat; Remarks by the President on Iraq, White House (10/7/2002) - Whitehouse.gov

"I think they're both equally important, and they're both dangerous. And as I said in my speech in Cincinnati, we will fight if need be the war on terror on two fronts. We've got plenty of capacity to do so. And I also mentioned the fact that there is a connection between al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein. The war on terror, Iraq is a part on the war on terror. And he must disarm." - President Condems Attack in Bali, White House (10/14/2002) - Whitehouse.gov

"This is a man who has got connections with Al Qaida. Imagine a terrorist network with Iraq as an arsenal and as a training ground, so that a Saddam Hussein could use this shadowy group of people to attack his enemy and leave no fingerprint behind. He's a threat." - Remarks by the President in Texas Welcome, White House (11/4/2002) - Whitehouse.gov

"He's a threat because he is dealing with Al Qaida. In my Cincinnati speech I reminded the American people, a true threat facing our country is that an Al Qaida-type network trained and armed by Saddam could attack America and leave not one fingerprint." - President Outlines Priorities, White House (11/7/2002) - BushOnIraq.gov

"He's had contacts with Al Qaida. Imagine the scenario where an Al Qaida-type organization uses Iraq as an arsenal, a place to get weapons, a place to be trained to use the weapons. Saddam Hussein could use surrogates to come and attack people he hates." - Remarks by the President at Arkansas Welcome, White House (11/4/2002) - BushOnIraq.com

2003

"Evidence from intelligence sources, secret communications, and statements by people now in custody reveal that Saddam Hussein aids and protects terrorists, including members of al Qaeda. Secretly, and without fingerprints, he could provide one of his hidden weapons to terrorists, or help develop their own." - President Delivers "State of the Union", White House (1/28/2003) - Whitehouse.gov

"Before September the 11th, many in the world believed that Saddam Hussein could be contained. But chemical agents, lethal viruses, and shadowy terrorist networks are not easily contained. Imagine those 19 hijackers with other weapons and other planes -- this time armed by Saddam Hussein. It would take one vial, one canister, one crate slipped into this country to bring a day of horror like none we have ever known." - President Delivers "State of the Union", White House (1/28/2003) - Whitehouse.gov

"Saddam Hussein has longstanding, direct and continuing ties to terrorist networks. Senior members of Iraqi intelligence and al Qaeda have met at least eight times since the early 1990s. Iraq has sent bomb-making and document forgery experts to work with al Qaeda. Iraq has also provided al Qaeda with chemical and biological weapons training. We also know that Iraq is harboring a terrorist network, headed by a senior al Qaeda terrorist planner." - President Bush: "World Can Rise to This Moment", White House (2/6/2003) - Whitehouse.gov

Saddam Hussein has longstanding, direct and continuing ties to terrorist networks. Senior members of Iraq intelligence and al Qaeda have met at least eight times since the early 1990s. Iraq has sent bomb-making and document forgery experts to work with al Qaeda. Iraq has also provided al Qaeda with chemical and biological weapons training. And an al Qaeda operative was sent to Iraq several times in the late 1990s for help in aquiring poisons and gases. We also know that Iraq is harboring a terrorist network headed by a senior al Qaeda terrorist planner." - President's Radio Address, White House (2/8/2003) - BushOnIraq.com

"He has trained and financed al Qaeda-type organizations before, al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations." - President George Bush Discusses Iraq in National Press Conference, White House (3/6/2003) - BushOnIraq.com

"The regime . . . has aided, trained and harbored terrorists, including operatives of al Qaeda. The danger is clear: using chemical, biological or, one day, nuclear weapons, obtained with the help of Iraq, the terrorists could fulfill their stated ambitions and kill thousands or hundreds of thousands of innocent people in our country, or any other." President Says Saddam Hussein Must Leave Iraq Within 48 Hours, White House (3/17/2003) -BushOnIraq.com

"The liberation of Iraq is a crucial advance in the campaign against terror. We've removed an ally of al Qaeda, and cut off a source of terrorist funding. And this much is certain: No terrorist network will gain weapons of mass destruction from the Iraqi regime, because the regime is no more." - President Bush Announces Major Combat Operations in Iraq Have Ended, White House (5/1/2003) - BushOnIraq.com

"The battle of Iraq is one victory in a war on terror that began on September the 11, 2001 -- and still goes on. That terrible morning, 19 evil men -- the shock troops of a hateful ideology -- gave America and the civilized world a glimpse of their ambitions. They imagined, in the words of one terrorist, that September the 11th would be the 'beginning of the end of America.' By seeking to turn our cities into killing fields, terrorists and their allies believed that they could destroy this nation's resolve, and force our retreat from the world. They have failed." - President Bush Announces Major Combat Operations in Iraq Have Ended, White House (5/1/2003) - BushOnIraq.com


Dick Cheney

2002

"In Afghanistan we found confirmation that bin Laden and the al-Qaeda network were seriously interested in nuclear and radiological weapons, and in biological and chemical agents. We are especially concerned about any possible linkup between terrorists and regimes that have or seek weapons of mass destruction." - Vice President Delivers Remarks to the National Academy of Home Builders, White House (6/6/2002) - BushOnIraq.com

"His regime has had high-level contacts with al Qaeda going back a decade and has provided training to al Qaeda terrorists." - Remarks by the Vice President at the Air National Guard Senior Leadership Conference, White House (12/2/2002) - BushOnIraq.com

"There is also a grave danger that al Qaeda or other terrorists will join with outlaw regimes that have these weapons to attack their common enemy, the United States of America. That is why confronting the threat posed by Iraq is not a distraction from the war on terror." - Remarks by the Vice President at the Air National Guard Senior Leadership Conference, White House (12/2/2002) - BushOnIraq.com

2003

"His regime aids and protects terrorists, including members of al Qaeda. He could decide secretly to provide weapons of mass destruction to terrorists for use against us." - Vice President's Remarks at 30th Political Action Conference, White House (1/30/2003) - BushOnIraq.com

"And Saddam Hussein becomes a prime suspect in that regard because of his past track record and because we know he has, in fact, developed these kinds of capabilities, chemical and biological weapons. . . We know that he has a long-standing relationship with various terrorist groups, including the al-Qaeda organization." - Dick Cheney, Meet the Press, NBC (3/16/2003) - BushOnIraq.com

"I have argued in the past, and would again, if we had been able to pre-empt the attacks of 9/11 would we have done it? And I think absolutely. We have to be prepared now to take the kind of bold action that's being contemplated with respect to Iraq in order to ensure that we don't get hit with a devastating attack when the terrorists' organization gets married up with a rogue state that's willing to provide it with the kinds of deadly capabilities that Saddam Hussein has developed and used over the years." - Dick Cheney, Meet the Press, NBC (3/16/2003) - BushOnIraq.com

"If we're successful in Iraq, if we can stand up a good representative government in Iraq, that secures the region so that it never again becomes a threat to its neighbors or to the United States, so it's not pursuing weapons of mass destruction, so that it's not a safe haven for terrorists, now we will have struck a major blow right at the heart of the base, if you will, the geographic base of the terrorists who have had us under assault now for many years, but most especially on 9/11." - Dick Cheney, Meet the Press, NBC (9/14/2003) - BushOnIraq.com

&quot Since September 11) We learned more and more that there was a relationship between Iraq and al-Qaeda that stretched back through most of the decade of the '90s, that it involved training, for example, on BW and CW, that al-Qaeda sent personnel to Baghdad to get trained on the systems that are involved. The Iraqis providing bomb-making expertise and advice to the al-Qaeda organization." - Dick Cheney, Meet the Press, NBC (9/14/2003) - BushOnIraq.com

"And the reason we had to do Iraq, if you hark back and think about that link between the terrorists and weapons of mass destruction, Iraq was the place where we were most fearful that that was most likely to occur, because in Iraq we've had a government -- not only was it one of the worst dictatorships in modern times, but had oftentimes hosted terrorists in the past . . . but also an established relationship with the al Qaeda organization . . . ." - Vice President Dick Cheney Remarks at Luncheon for Congressman Jim Gerlach, White House (10/3/2003) - BushOnIraq.com

&quot I)f we had not paid any attention to the fact that al Qaeda was being hosted in Northeastern Iraq, part of poisons network producing ricin and cyanide that was intended to be used in attacks both in Europe, as well as in North Africa and ignored it, we would have been derelict in our duties and responsibilities." - Vice President Dick Cheney Remarks at Luncheon for Congressman Jim Gerlach, White House (10/3/2003) - BushOnIraq.com

"He cultivated ties to terror, hosting the Abu Nidal organization, supporting terrorists, making payments to the families of suicide bombers in Israel. He also had an established relationship with al Qaeda, providing training to al Qaeda members in the areas of poisons, gases, making conventional bombs." - Remarks by Vice President Dick Cheney at the Heritage Foundation, White House (10/10/2003) - BushOnIraq.com

"Saddam Hussein had a lengthy history of reckless and sudden aggression. He cultivated ties to terror -- hosting the Abu Nidal organization, supporting terrorists, and making payments to the families of suicide bombers. He also had an established relationship with Al Qaida -- providing training to Al Qaida members in areas of poisons, gases and conventional bombs. He built, possessed, and used weapons of mass destruction." - Richard B. Cheney Delivers Remarks at the James A. Baker, III, Institute for Public Policy, White House (10/18/2003) - BushOnIraq.com

2004

"We'll find ample evidence confirming the link, that is the connection if you will between al Qaida and the Iraqi intelligence services. They have worked together on a number of occasions." - Transcript of interview with Vice President Dick Cheney, Rocky Mountain News (1/9/2004) - BushOnIraq.com

"We did have reporting that was public, that came out shortly after the 9/11 attack, provided by the Czech government, suggesting there had been a meeting in Prague between Mohammed Atta, the lead hijacker, and a man named al-Ani (Ahmed Khalil Ibrahim Samir al-Ani), who was an Iraqi intelligence official in Prague, at the embassy there, in April of '01, prior to the 9/11 attacks. It has never been -- we've never been able to collect any more information on that. That was the one that possibly tied the two together to 9/11." - Transcript of Interview with Vice President Dick Cheney, Rocky Mountain News (1/9/2004) - BushOnIraq.com

"Saddam Hussein had a lengthy history of reckless and sudden aggression. His regime cultivated ties to terror, including the al Qaeda network, and had built, possessed, and used weapons of mass destruction." - Richard B. Cheney Delivers Remarks to the Los Angeles World Affairs Council, White House (1/14/2004) - BushOnIraq.com

"Saddam Hussein had a lengthy history of reckless and sudden aggression. His regime cultivated ties to terror, including the al Qaeda network, and had built, possessed, and used weapons of mass destruction." - Richard B. Cheney Delivers Remarks to Veterans at the Arizona Wing Museum, White House (1/15/2004) - BushOnIraq.com

"I continue to believe. I think there's overwhelming evidence that there was a connection between al-Qaeda and the Iraqi government. We've discovered since documents indicating that a guy named Abdul Rahman Yasin, who was a part of the team that attacked the World Trade Center in '93, when he arrived back in Iraq was put on the payroll and provided a house, safe harbor and sanctuary. That's public information now. So Saddam Hussein had an established track record of providing safe harbor and sanctuary for terrorists. . . . I mean, this is a guy who was an advocate and a supporter of terrorism whenever it suited his purpose, and I'm very confident that there was an established relationship there." - Dick Cheney, Morning Edition, NPR (1/22/2004) - BushOnIraq.com


From the White House website, Bush's comments about Saddam Hussein
(Campaign speeches only. For period of October 10 - November 04.)

OCT 28 Remarks by the President at New Mexico Welcome
"This is a person who has had contacts with al Qaeda."

OCT 28 Remarks by the President in Colorado Welcome
"He's got connections with al Qaeda."

OCT 31 Remarks by the President at South Dakota Welcome
"This is a guy who has had connections with these shadowy terrorist networks."

NOV 01 Remarks by the President at New Hampshire Welcome
"We know he's got ties with al Qaeda."

NOV 02 Remarks by the President in Florida Welcome
"We know that he's had connections with al Qaeda."

NOV 02 Remarks by the President in Atlanta, Georgia Welcome
"He's had connections with shadowy terrorist networks like al Qaeda."

NOV 02 Remarks by the President at Tennessee Welcome
"We know that he has had contacts with terrorist networks like al Qaeda."

NOV 03 Remarks by the President in Minnesota Welcome
"This is a man who has had contacts with al Qaeda."

NOV 04 Remarks by the President at Missouri Welcome
"This is a man who has had al Qaeda connections."

NOV 04 Remarks by the President at Arkansas Welcome
"He's had contacts with al Qaeda."

NOV 04 Remarks by the President in Texas Welcome
"This is a man who has got connections with al Qaeda."

Plus this speculation:

OCT 14 Remarks by the President in Michigan Welcome
"... we need to think about Saddam Hussein using al Qaeda to do his dirty work, to not leave fingerprints behind."

NOV 03 Remarks by the President in South Dakota Welcome
"And, not only that, he is -- would like nothing better than to hook-up with one of these shadowy terrorist networks like al Qaeda, provide some weapons and training to them, let them come and do his dirty work, and we wouldn't be able to see his fingerprints on his action. "

NOV 03 Remarks by the President at Illinois Welcome
"He is a man who would likely -- he is a man who would likely team up with al Qaeda. He could provide the arsenal for one of these shadowy terrorist networks. He would love to use somebody else to attack us, and not leave fingerprints behind. "

Above courtesy of: http://uggabugga.blogspot.com/2002/11/truth-and-fiction...


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_oet&address=358x1293

You were played on 911

Think also about the Patriot Act on how it was written up before 911

Think about the government grade anthrax and that story.


Then look at all the evidence on 911 and the data..... you were played.

and in denial in you think they had nothing to do with it.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
41. Watch 911 Press for truth- by DUer Paul Thompson
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 02:10 PM
Mar 2014

The film uses archive news footage, interviews, press conferences and newspaper clippings to document the attacks and the establishment and workings of the 9/11 Commission. The film can be roughly divided into three sections:

The first part of the film describes the efforts to pressure the U.S. government into setting up a formal investigation and shows how eventually the decision was made to create the 9/11 Commission. The family members in turn, set up a group called the 9/11 Family Steering Committee, to monitor the Commission and provide it with additional questions. The film shows some of the initial stumbles of the Commission, such as the resignation Henry Kissinger, the original chairman of the Commission, after receiving criticism for refusing to release the names of all his firm's clients. It denounces some of the decisions of the Bush Administration, such as only allowing certain members of the Commission to review sensitive White House documents, and president George W. Bush and vice president Dick Cheney agreeing to meet with the Commission, but only together, behind closed doors and not under oath. The segment ends with the Jersey Girls complaining that the eventual report of the 9/11 Commission failed to meet their expectations.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11:_Press_for_Truth


7.9 rating on IMBD






http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0867134/


Youtube:




What I like about this it gives you real time lines that was in the news but ignored because it was in the back pages.


 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
44. they would have had an almost impossible time selling the war to the American people
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 03:58 PM
Mar 2014

if they did not incite fear and anger and a feeling of partriotism in them. That did it, plus someone got away with trillions, someone got to claim the towers as a fully covered insurance claim, rather than paying millions to have them torn down.

win/win for them.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
45. Palin missed this one too, "In what respect Charlie?"...and I think it's relevant to the OP
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 04:13 PM
Mar 2014

Bush's Doctrine of Preemptive strike would have been envoked. Probabaly using the same WMD meme it had already used. 9-11 just provided a paniced population the silver tray for Bush to move ahead.

http://www.casi.org.uk/discuss/2002/msg01559.html

http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/robert-schlesinger/2008/09/12/sarah-palin-and-charlie-gibson-got-the-bush-doctrine-wrong-its-preventive-war-not-pre-emptive

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
47. But the preemptive strike doctrine
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 09:48 PM
Mar 2014

made more sense after 9/11 (and was announced after 9/11). There was no political will for that kind of thing before the event.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
48. From my reading, it wasn't a doctrine for only 9-11
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 10:45 AM
Mar 2014

however, it became more talked about and more of a possible future role for the USA when 9-11 occurred.

 

Corruption Inc

(1,568 posts)
46. They had plenty of other propaganda techniques ready to employ
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 09:35 PM
Mar 2014

Remember how evil Saddam was because he "tortured people"? That was until we opened our own torture camps.

The term "Madman" was used often too, to describe the guy.

Oil itself could have been spun into the economic reasoning via our vast, complicit and paid off press.

Or, some other faked immediate threat would have been invented for our viewing pleasure.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So If 9/11 Never Happened...