General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy would anybody vote for a Party that thinks the end of the world can not come soon enough???
The approach I would take is.
By asking the question. By having the leadership bring this up for discussion without belittling anyones beliefs.
Just point out you would be a better interim office holder to manage things until it happens.
stopbush
(24,396 posts)eom
Loudly
(2,436 posts)other than the imminent return of the Lord.
RC
(25,592 posts)For a variety of reasons, they won't like the surprise ending in store for them.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)candidates do not have the motivation to better society while they are waiting for the end time.
1awake
(1,494 posts)If religious people are wrong, doesn't matter because there's nothing. If non religious people are wrong... well.. lol...
RC
(25,592 posts)1awake
(1,494 posts)if I do something bad in your name, that doesn't equate to you being bad.
gulliver
(13,180 posts)Too good for the media. Everyone has agreed to not call attention to elephants in the room.
A couple of things got through in the Republican debates. None of the viable Republicans apparently believe in evolution, and the audience is OK with people dying for lack of health insurance. So that's why they are trying to reduce the number of conventions.
No one asked Romney about Moroni or anyone about Revelations. But the answers would have been very interesting.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)say candidate A believes the sooner the world ends is good, so they will not have policies that will better society or you the voter.
I'm candidate B and will be a better manager of policy while we are waiting and work for a better society for everyone.
Dirty Socialist
(3,252 posts)CK_John
(10,005 posts)RebelOne
(30,947 posts)These are a bunch of wingnuts who think they are going to be flown up to heaven any day now.
rurallib
(62,413 posts)has a policy of destroying it?
CK_John
(10,005 posts)WE have to appeal to their selfish interest the old what's in it for me.
proudretiredvet
(312 posts)What is said here is not true. There are some on the right who believe this but that is by far not most of them and is not the "party".
It is about the same as some from that side claiming that all of us on the left have only one answer, hard core communism.
There is about an equal amount of truth to both statements.
And that is none.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)proudretiredvet
(312 posts)How far would a liberal politician get if they did not appease the socialists in the democratic ranks? Do you really thing all democratic national politicians are socialists?
Same crap different flavor.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)proudretiredvet
(312 posts)CK_John
(10,005 posts)working for the betterment of the people in the district.
proudretiredvet
(312 posts)CK_John
(10,005 posts)proudretiredvet
(312 posts)Then leave it alone for ever and ever.