Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is this picture of Brit boy bander Harry Styles "Cultural Appropriation"? (Original Post) superpatriotman Mar 2014 OP
No - it was a young man posing for yet another silly picture. enlightenment Mar 2014 #1
It's a goofy kid wearing a costume in a western wear shop. Codeine Mar 2014 #2
Yes. As if there's something wrong with that. Igel Mar 2014 #3
Nope. Lucinda Mar 2014 #4
look at all those cowboy boots! is it cultural appropriation for non-cowboys to wear those? nt msongs Mar 2014 #5

enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
1. No - it was a young man posing for yet another silly picture.
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 01:16 PM
Mar 2014

Apparently in some sort of western wear shop, based on the items in the background. Given that there seems to be another head-dress in the background, it would appear they are items for sale.




 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
2. It's a goofy kid wearing a costume in a western wear shop.
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 01:20 PM
Mar 2014

If he starts showing up at pow-wows and dancing then it would be a cultural appropriation. This isn't anything.

Igel

(35,300 posts)
3. Yes. As if there's something wrong with that.
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 02:23 PM
Mar 2014

It's like taking a sample of something and using it in a different way. It can be mocking or a parody. It can be intended to be serious (and still be mocking or a parody in other's eyes). Or some can declare it to be "high art".

If we actually believe in the kind of freedom of expression we claim, we're stuck with the idea of some people, some groups--including those who have been historically oppressed--being offended. Nobody's offendedness is better than anybody else's offendedness. Mock Jesus, Buddha, Mohammed, they're all the same. Mock George Washington or Robert E Lee or MLK, meh. If the mockery riles up nobody, those doing it to offend will stop doing it (and, at the least, the level of riledness in society will decrease) or do it for whatever their own self-satisfying ends are.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is this picture of Brit b...