General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe poor neglected gifted child
David Lubinski is a psychologist at Vanderbilt University, where the project has been based since the 1990s. He and his wife and fellow Vanderbilt professor, Camilla Benbow, codirect the study and have dedicated their careers to learning about this exceptional population.
This is like putting a magnifying glass on the tippy, tippy top of the distribution, he says.
In a recent paper, Lubinski and his colleagues caught up with one cohort of 320 people now in their late 30s. At 12, their SAT math or verbal scores had placed them among the top one-100th of 1 percent. Today, many are CEOs, professors at top research universities, transplant surgeons, and successful novelists.
That outcome sounds like exactly what youd imagine should happen: Top young people grow into high-achieving adults. In the education world, the study has provided important new evidence that it really is possible to identify the kids who are likely to become exceptional achievers in the future, something previous research has not always found to be the case. But for that reason, perhaps surprisingly, it has also triggered a new round of worry.
http://www.bostonglobe.com/ideas/2014/03/15/the-poor-neglected-gifted-child/rJpv8G4oeawWBBvXVtZyFM/story.html
1000words
(7,051 posts)will crush more spirits of gifted children than nurture them.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)It could be read as almost mocking 'gifted kids', but when you actually take the link and read the rest of the article, it's literally talking about poor children who are precocious, but don't have the advantages of the equally precocious children of more affluent parents.
Of course, by the end of the article, they're discussing the idea of screening out gifted kids to funnel them into 'elite' programs, as some of the Asian countries do. Of course, in the States, such screening takes place largely in terms of wealth, with the children of poorer parents left to hit or miss scholarship opportunities, while many 'Ivy's' are automatically accepting 'legacy' students of richer parents, whether or not they can handle more challenging curricula.
Faux egalitarianism, with money tilting the playing field.