Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 02:47 PM Mar 2014

Boeing 777 used low altitude 'terrain masking' manoeuvre practised by fighter jets...

<snip>

Investigators told the New Straits Times that they were now convinced the aircraft flow low over Kelantan, which is in the north east - exactly the same area where the villagers and fishermen who saw bright lights in the sky on the night the jet vanished are living.

At least nine people - fishermen, farmers and villagers - have made reports to police about seeing lights in the sky and some said they heard the loud noise of an engine.

These accounts appear to match the conclusions of investigators who say the jet flew low after making a sharp turn and heading west from its course over the South China Sea.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2582595/Boeing-777-hijackers-plunged-5-000ft-used-low-altitude-terrain-masking-manoeuvre-practised-fighter-jets-avoid-radar-detection.html

================

I know this is the daily mail.

But there is something very fishy going on with this airplane. Is it a test run of some kind to see how they can hide and attack without being found by radar?

I think there is a plot afoot. But who knows what it is?

39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Boeing 777 used low altitude 'terrain masking' manoeuvre practised by fighter jets... (Original Post) kentuck Mar 2014 OP
Isn't this like part of the plot of one of the Airport movies? jmowreader Mar 2014 #1
they can be easily Niceguy1 Mar 2014 #26
Investigators are now convinced about this.... Iggo Mar 2014 #2
Excuse me, stewardess, why did we just do a barrel roll? NightWatcher Mar 2014 #3
Maybe out to get the worlds tallest building..recently the second worlds tallest. Auntie Bush Mar 2014 #4
There are many airstrips big enough for the plane to land... kentuck Mar 2014 #5
If any of this were to be factual seveneyes Mar 2014 #6
Excellent question? kentuck Mar 2014 #8
They might keep a small number as hostages, but I avebury Mar 2014 #22
Flying so low...they might be coming on automatically on a 777 HipChick Mar 2014 #10
That is the sort of thing it's possible to practice with a flight simulator Fumesucker Mar 2014 #7
If you were making a movie...? kentuck Mar 2014 #9
Also... kentuck Mar 2014 #12
If you were planning to use a plane later on for a 9/11 style attack or some other mission stevenleser Mar 2014 #11
Unless you could make a couple of stops and re-fuel on the way over? kentuck Mar 2014 #13
If the simulator has any role, the important thing would be the files... JHB Mar 2014 #19
Would it be unusual for a pilot to have a flight simulator? kentuck Mar 2014 #27
Anything from "fly" for fun to practicing for requalification... JHB Mar 2014 #39
They had me right up to the "sonar barrier" thing. FarCenter Mar 2014 #14
If they had landed...? kentuck Mar 2014 #15
I joked with some friends a few days after it went missing MattBaggins Mar 2014 #16
The last radio message heard.... kentuck Mar 2014 #17
I was playing on the whole bit of that company that had 20 people on board MattBaggins Mar 2014 #18
Was it an American company?? kentuck Mar 2014 #21
I believe it was an American company. MattBaggins Mar 2014 #25
Good night is a pretty normal sign off malaise Mar 2014 #20
And it was 14 minutes after that good night message... kentuck Mar 2014 #23
It gains significance malaise Mar 2014 #24
Then they turned the plane back toward Malaysia and southern Thailand? kentuck Mar 2014 #28
The stolen passports were for asylum malaise Mar 2014 #37
True but... kentuck Mar 2014 #38
2 minutes after the good night the plane turned around. JimDandy Mar 2014 #30
Did they turn off the transponder first? kentuck Mar 2014 #32
Apparently in that order. n/t JimDandy Mar 2014 #34
America has kept airplane technology out of the hands of the Iranians for 34 years. applegrove Mar 2014 #29
So no Boeing 777 ever lands in Iran? n/t JimDandy Mar 2014 #31
They can't get it and copy all the systems on a layover. Come on!!! I'm just speculating of course. applegrove Mar 2014 #35
Interesting point. kentuck Mar 2014 #33
I know. I'm out there with my speculation. applegrove Mar 2014 #36

jmowreader

(50,566 posts)
1. Isn't this like part of the plot of one of the Airport movies?
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 03:00 PM
Mar 2014

In the third one, people trying to steal a 747 and its priceless cargo planned to drop off radar and fly to a deserted island. (It didn't work.)

So what's the angle in this one? The crew doesn't get a cargo manifest a week ahead of time so they can't plan this out, and a 777 is rare enough that if East Goat Screw Air suddenly showed up with it people would ask questions. The major parts all have serial numbers so they can't be anonymously sold.

Iggo

(47,571 posts)
2. Investigators are now convinced about this....
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 03:05 PM
Mar 2014

...until they become convinced about something else.

Auntie Bush

(17,528 posts)
4. Maybe out to get the worlds tallest building..recently the second worlds tallest.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 04:08 PM
Mar 2014

I wouldn't want to work or live anywhere in the area. However, I guess the mission failed.

Did those people who saw the lights also hear the crash...did anyone?

 

seveneyes

(4,631 posts)
6. If any of this were to be factual
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 04:18 PM
Mar 2014

The biggest question would be why have your bright/landing lights on...unless you are landing?

avebury

(10,952 posts)
22. They might keep a small number as hostages, but I
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 07:43 PM
Mar 2014

just don't see them keeping all the passengers alive. They would be a drain on the hijackers' resources and if they want to use the plane for something else there would be way too many people to keep quiet.

HipChick

(25,485 posts)
10. Flying so low...they might be coming on automatically on a 777
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 04:35 PM
Mar 2014

If you are that low, the plane thinks its going to land..

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
7. That is the sort of thing it's possible to practice with a flight simulator
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 04:24 PM
Mar 2014

You could even practice on the actual terrain you plan to fly over.

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
9. If you were making a movie...?
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 04:34 PM
Mar 2014

Your camera angle would focus in on the flight simulator in the basement...

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
12. Also...
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 04:47 PM
Mar 2014

It sounds a little like there may been some military background in regards to the radar and terrain maneuvers?

A little background on the pilot and co-pilot? The pilot, in his fifties, had been with the airline since 1981. He had been slightly involved with protests about the existing regime in Malaysia. The younger man, a son of a high level "civil servant", was in his twenties and was known to bring young ladies into the cabin and take "selfies" - but no photos of the pilot - and was later reprimanded for it. That was a couple of years ago. Also, it has been reported that he is a devout Muslim.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
11. If you were planning to use a plane later on for a 9/11 style attack or some other mission
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 04:36 PM
Mar 2014

you might do this. This would take a lot of resources. Fuel, etc.

There aren't many sane sounding scenarios for this information.

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
13. Unless you could make a couple of stops and re-fuel on the way over?
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 04:51 PM
Mar 2014

I hate conspiracy theories. However, that doesn't mean there are never any conspiracies?

I would like to know the history of the flight simulator. Both the pilot and co-pilot lived in a gated neighborhood, but they were not next-door neighbors. I would like to know more about that.

????

JHB

(37,163 posts)
19. If the simulator has any role, the important thing would be the files...
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 07:33 PM
Mar 2014

...i.e., any saved sessions, autosaves, unusual destinations, waypoints, high-res terrain sets, etc. If it was used to train for anything unusual, that's where there would be some indication (or better yet, a record).

The simulator itself looked like a gaming rig with with all the bells and whistles the flight sim community likes: multiple screens, fancy joysticks & pedals, etc. Nothing an airline pilot (or copilot, or steward) couldn't afford to put together over a few years.

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
27. Would it be unusual for a pilot to have a flight simulator?
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 08:04 PM
Mar 2014

And for what purposes? To hone his skills?

JHB

(37,163 posts)
39. Anything from "fly" for fun to practicing for requalification...
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 09:55 PM
Mar 2014

...to combat sims, to just "trying out" planes he doesn't usually have the opportunity to fly. Even flights of fancy, like a plane that has all the flight characteristics of a Sopwith Camel, but the in-sim model looks like Snoopy on his doghouse, in full "world famous WWI ace" regalia.

There are hundreds of thousands of flight sim hobbyists, a significant portion of whom are also pilots. Most have a bit simpler setups, like a PC with a fancy joystick, but there's probably thousands of people who go whole hog and get all the toys. An actual pilot would probably be even more inclined to do that, just out of familiarity.

My point is, simply having a setup like his is not remarkable on its own: it's pure men, boys, price of toys-type stuff. If it has anything significant, it will be in how he used it in the weeks prior, and whatever the authorities can recover from it.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
14. They had me right up to the "sonar barrier" thing.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 04:57 PM
Mar 2014
Investigators told a Malaysian newspaper that the Boeing 777 had dropped to a lower altitude to avoid ground radar, using the surrounding terrain as a sonar barrier.



kentuck

(111,110 posts)
15. If they had landed...?
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 05:49 PM
Mar 2014

Last edited Mon Mar 17, 2014, 08:14 PM - Edit history (1)

I don't think any of the authorities would want to publicize it? Why not just deny them publicity?? It's a very interesting mystery, to say the least.

MattBaggins

(7,905 posts)
16. I joked with some friends a few days after it went missing
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 06:20 PM
Mar 2014

saying it was in Korea.


Maybe it is after all.

Still believe it went down but this is weird.

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
17. The last radio message heard....
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 06:59 PM
Mar 2014

was from the co-pilot, not the pilot. He wished them a good night and minutes later the plane had changed course. My guess is that it is hid somewhere in a long valley in Thailand. That is where the illegal passport business was operating. It's a mystery to me...

MattBaggins

(7,905 posts)
18. I was playing on the whole bit of that company that had 20 people on board
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 07:10 PM
Mar 2014

Korea got them to get trade secrets out of them.

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
21. Was it an American company??
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 07:37 PM
Mar 2014

It's hard to imagine that either one or both, the pilot and the co-pilot, are not involved? I keep returning to the flight simulator.

MattBaggins

(7,905 posts)
25. I believe it was an American company.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 07:49 PM
Mar 2014

I doubt Korea would really do it though. They may be carzy but not that cray cray

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
23. And it was 14 minutes after that good night message...
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 07:43 PM
Mar 2014

..that radio communications were shut off. 14 minutes? Was there a discussion during those 14 minutes? Or, if it was planned ahead of time, wouldn't they have done that almost immediately? Strange occurrence.

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
28. Then they turned the plane back toward Malaysia and southern Thailand?
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 08:08 PM
Mar 2014

I wonder if the stolen passports have any significance? And if they could fill it up wherever they landed and have a stolen flight plan? Did they plan on flying into a place that was surrounded by mountains?

malaise

(269,193 posts)
37. The stolen passports were for asylum
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 08:21 PM
Mar 2014

Mothers were expecting their sons.
I don't even know if the pilots did anything. The aircraft could have been compromised.

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
38. True but...
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 08:46 PM
Mar 2014

Were the passport thieves in Thailand into any other business, forgery or doctoring documents? Hell, it could have been aliens, that breathe water, that came from deep in the Indian Ocean, for all I know?

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
30. 2 minutes after the good night the plane turned around.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 08:10 PM
Mar 2014

Interesting that they didn't turn off the radio comm until 12 minutes after that.

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
32. Did they turn off the transponder first?
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 08:13 PM
Mar 2014

And then the radio? They probably did that for a reason?

applegrove

(118,816 posts)
29. America has kept airplane technology out of the hands of the Iranians for 34 years.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 08:10 PM
Mar 2014

Their airplanes regularly fall out of the sky. Maybe they really, really wanted a prototype to copy.

applegrove

(118,816 posts)
35. They can't get it and copy all the systems on a layover. Come on!!! I'm just speculating of course.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 08:20 PM
Mar 2014
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Boeing 777 used low altit...