Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
4. How can this be more wild than the story itself? It's hard to believe
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 12:11 PM
Mar 2014

that the pilot or co-pilot who seem like easy going guys would hijack the plane and it doesn't appear that any of the passengers have the skill to fly a plane or a motive to hijack.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,900 posts)
2. No. Airplane designers don't waste any space.
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 12:00 PM
Mar 2014

If there was enough available space in that area it would probably be included in the bathroom - those are awfully small as it is.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
3. Yep. If there was space for a person, they'd put a seat there and charge someone for it.
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 12:04 PM
Mar 2014

No wasted space on a plane, not unlike a well designed sailboat.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
5. They don't even give up enough room for the flight attendants to sit
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 12:11 PM
Mar 2014

comfortably. On a full flight, they can put their asses down on a jump seat and nothing more!

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
6. Yes but don't fucking tell everybody!
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 12:13 PM
Mar 2014

That's where I stick my carry-on when all the overhead bins are full!

SSHHHHHH!!!!

brooklynite

(94,792 posts)
7. To what purpose?
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 12:13 PM
Mar 2014

Why not just buy a ticket? The cockpit is still locked, and you'd just be one of 300 passengers.

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
8. I think this hijacking is a dry run. I don't think anyone will
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 12:38 PM
Mar 2014

ever claim responsibility because those who did this don't want extra scrutiny, it's in their interest for authorities to be kept wondering who's responsible. Hiding someone in the plane would insure complete anonymity and/or perhaps the perp is on a no fly list so he wouldn't be able to board to begin with.

brooklynite

(94,792 posts)
9. A dry run for WHAT?
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 01:03 PM
Mar 2014

Seriously, if you have a pilot willing to divert the aircraft, what are you trying to practice?

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
10. No one knows if it was the pilot who diverted the plane. As for what they are
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 01:23 PM
Mar 2014

practicing perhaps for another 9/11. All conjecture I admit but this is a strange event. It the one of the crew wanted to commit suicide why not crash the plane as soon as it was above open water, why reprogramme the flight path? All we know is that the plane was diverted and there has been no claim of responsibility.

brooklynite

(94,792 posts)
11. The last radio communication has been confirmed as the Co-Pilot....
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 01:26 PM
Mar 2014

...and occured after ACARS was shut off.

Personally, I apply to this the same principles I apply to religion: it's perfectly acceptable for the answer to a question to be "I don't know".

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»For people who know about...