Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(101,311 posts)
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 01:57 PM Mar 2014

WSJ: Saying income inequality is too high encouraged Putin to take Crimea

Last edited Fri Mar 21, 2014, 02:50 PM - Edit history (1)

No, really, that's what their Deputy Editorial Page Director argues (via http://alicublog.blogspot.com/2014/03/propagandists-in-hurry.html):

Vladimir Putin re-proves that sometimes a bad person gains control of the instruments of national power. Their populations do nothing or can't, because they are disarmed by thugs with overwhelming firepower. Or, as on Russian TV now, they are marinated in anti-U.S. propaganda. Today even second-rate megalomaniacs gain access to high-tech weaponry, including missiles and nuclear bombs.

Running alongside these old realities is a new phenomenon, surely noticed by Mr. Putin: The nations of the civilized world have decided their most pressing concern is income inequality. Barack Obama says so, as does the International Monetary Fund. Western Europe amid the Ukraine crisis is a case study of nations redistributing themselves and perhaps NATO into impotence.

Because no modern Democrat can be credible on this, some Republican presidential candidate will have to explain the high price of America's fatigue. Fatigue will allow global disorder to displace 60 years of democratic order. If the U.S. doesn't lead, the strongmen win because for them it's easier. They don't lead people; they coerce them. Ask the millions free for now in the old countries of the Iron Curtain.

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303802104579449393620644098


So, as well as publishing arguments that saying inequality is bad makes us Nazis, at the same time, the Wall Street Journal thinks that saying inequality is bad makes us Neville Chamberlain! Double reverse Godwin!

I'm waiting for their op-ed blaming the loss of MH370 on the call for the increase of the US minimum wage ...

On edit: and just after I wrote that last sentence, what does alicublog find next, in another Murdoch paper?

John Podhoretz at the New York Post:

Even the haunting confusion over the missing Malaysian aircraft, for which no rational person could hold our president responsible, is surely contributing to a general sense that the world is coming unglued — and that the president is hunting around under his desk for a glue stick he hopes one of his predecessors might have left there for him.

http://alicublog.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/you-wish.html
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WSJ: Saying income inequality is too high encouraged Putin to take Crimea (Original Post) muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 OP
LOL. woo me with science Mar 2014 #1
BS. PowerToThePeople Mar 2014 #2
On the other more sensible hand CBGLuthier Mar 2014 #3
I don't get the link between a more just distribution upaloopa Mar 2014 #4
There isn't one Scootaloo Mar 2014 #7
They're worried the American people are starting to see what's wrong with capitalism... reformist2 Mar 2014 #5
LOL! JVS Mar 2014 #6
Translation: If we give the money to the poor and not the MIC the Bogeyman will get us. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2014 #8
Yeah right, guess there's no income inequality in Russia and the haves didn't sinkingfeeling Mar 2014 #9
They're not even pretending to be smart any more. GeorgeGist Mar 2014 #10

CBGLuthier

(12,723 posts)
3. On the other more sensible hand
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 02:00 PM
Mar 2014

If we would stay out of these damned messes maybe their own citizens would rise to the occasion and overthrow their undesirable leaders. In rather that than spend billions and sacrifice american lives to keep free a populace unwilling to make the effort themselves.

As for the alleged good influence of america the last 60 years. Puh leeeze. Ask the children of Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Afghanistan, iraq and all the other places we have waged our little fucking wars.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
4. I don't get the link between a more just distribution
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 02:03 PM
Mar 2014

of wealth and weakness.
I would think a strong country would be one where everyone thrives.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
7. There isn't one
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 02:08 PM
Mar 2014

This is just the WSJ catering to its wealthy and conservative readership, by agreeing that wealth = power and equality = weakness, while tying it up in current events. I'm surprised they didn't do this for Sandy Hook or something

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WSJ: Saying income inequa...