General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWSJ: Saying income inequality is too high encouraged Putin to take Crimea
Last edited Fri Mar 21, 2014, 02:50 PM - Edit history (1)
No, really, that's what their Deputy Editorial Page Director argues (via http://alicublog.blogspot.com/2014/03/propagandists-in-hurry.html):
Running alongside these old realities is a new phenomenon, surely noticed by Mr. Putin: The nations of the civilized world have decided their most pressing concern is income inequality. Barack Obama says so, as does the International Monetary Fund. Western Europe amid the Ukraine crisis is a case study of nations redistributing themselves and perhaps NATO into impotence.
Because no modern Democrat can be credible on this, some Republican presidential candidate will have to explain the high price of America's fatigue. Fatigue will allow global disorder to displace 60 years of democratic order. If the U.S. doesn't lead, the strongmen win because for them it's easier. They don't lead people; they coerce them. Ask the millions free for now in the old countries of the Iron Curtain.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303802104579449393620644098
So, as well as publishing arguments that saying inequality is bad makes us Nazis, at the same time, the Wall Street Journal thinks that saying inequality is bad makes us Neville Chamberlain! Double reverse Godwin!
I'm waiting for their op-ed blaming the loss of MH370 on the call for the increase of the US minimum wage ...
On edit: and just after I wrote that last sentence, what does alicublog find next, in another Murdoch paper?
Even the haunting confusion over the missing Malaysian aircraft, for which no rational person could hold our president responsible, is surely contributing to a general sense that the world is coming unglued and that the president is hunting around under his desk for a glue stick he hopes one of his predecessors might have left there for him.
http://alicublog.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/you-wish.html
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Great post.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Street
Jackasses
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)If we would stay out of these damned messes maybe their own citizens would rise to the occasion and overthrow their undesirable leaders. In rather that than spend billions and sacrifice american lives to keep free a populace unwilling to make the effort themselves.
As for the alleged good influence of america the last 60 years. Puh leeeze. Ask the children of Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Afghanistan, iraq and all the other places we have waged our little fucking wars.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)of wealth and weakness.
I would think a strong country would be one where everyone thrives.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)This is just the WSJ catering to its wealthy and conservative readership, by agreeing that wealth = power and equality = weakness, while tying it up in current events. I'm surprised they didn't do this for Sandy Hook or something
reformist2
(9,841 posts)JVS
(61,935 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)sinkingfeeling
(51,454 posts)put Putin in power.
"Russia Sees Staggering Income Inequality" - http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=233472082
"Russia Has Highest Level Of Wealth Inequality " - http://www.rferl.org/content/russia-billionaire-wealth-inequality/25132471.html