Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Bluffed, Baffled and Bewildered: How Rand Paul Bilked Berkeley"
Bluffed, Baffled and Bewildered: How Rand Paul Bilked Berkeleyby Peter Watts at the Huffington Post
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peter-watts/bluffed-baffled-rand-paul-berkeley_b_5000062.html
"SNIP....................
Lions on Leashes
First of all, the audience was tightly controlled. Paul set a clear title for his Berkeley appearance and it was calibrated to the interests of the audience: privacy. He could pretty much guarantee that so long as he kept to the prepared script, the audience would keep a respectful silence. The problems were always going to come with the Q&A.
When we got to the questions however, what did we get? Pre-selected (for which read "heavily vetted" questions. There was nothing there to open up any embarrassing civil-liberties type areas. Indeed, several of the questions were directly chosen to enable the speaker to polish-up his credentials.
Millennial Momentum
Millennials are deeply suspicious of state authority. Paul's chosen topic offered perfect synchronization. Throw in frequent references to cellphones, the web and the threat posed by a snooping government, and rapt attention was guaranteed. Rand Paul is a clever and thoughtful speaker. His isolation of this one particular aspect of Libertarian belief was where he and his audience would overlap. The audience were enthralled. So much so that they didn't notice the giant logical chasm -- and opportunity -- that Paul was delicately tip-toeing around.
"What you do on your cellphone is none of their damned business"
This line was used twice, and to applause each time. Rand Paul passionately believes that nobody, just nobody, has the right to interfere with you and your phone.
...................SNIP"
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 646 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Bluffed, Baffled and Bewildered: How Rand Paul Bilked Berkeley" (Original Post)
applegrove
Mar 2014
OP
I hope these voters are paying attention. Maybe they should have asked why we pay more for our
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#1
okaawhatever
(9,461 posts)1. I hope these voters are paying attention. Maybe they should have asked why we pay more for our
phone/internet in this country and have much slower service than other countries.
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)2. All I got from this was:
"What you do on your cellphone is none of the government's damned business...but reproductive rights is a different story."