Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNate Silver got you down? Why his forecast is more nuanced than you think
Nate Silver, the worlds only celebrity statistician, finally issued a 2014 forecast. According to Silvers number crunching, the GOP is the slight favorite in Novembers fight for control of the Senate, with a 60 percent likelihood of taking down the Democrats. As usually happens in the wake of a Silver prediction, everyone lost their damn minds.
Liberals and Democrats, who huddled around the warm light of Silvers projections during the long darkness of October 2012, quickly lost faith in his methodology. Republicans and conservatives, who spent the latter stages of 2012 denouncing Silver as a hack propagandist, reported his latest projection with straight-faced earnestness. What once was skewed is now simply math.
What Silver has done is put a number to a widely acknowledged political reality: The GOP is well-positioned to make gains in 2014. The Atlantics David Graham points out that Democrats faced a similar reality in 2010, but refused to see it. Party officials are more publicly upfront about the dangers the Democrats face this time around than they were in 2010, but knowing that peril is ahead is different from knowing how to stop it. That rings true, and you know what does nothing to stop, slow or deflect an oncoming political wave? Complaining about skewed polls.
So what can be done? Last week I wrote about how Democrats would be smart to go on a carefully calibrated pro-Obamacare offensive it wont turn Obamacare into a winning issue, though it could help mollify the large swaths of voters who are frustrated by (but not ready to give up on) the health law. A good place to focus would be Obamacares expansion of Medicaid, the politics of which are increasingly favorable to the Democrats.
Salon
Liberals and Democrats, who huddled around the warm light of Silvers projections during the long darkness of October 2012, quickly lost faith in his methodology. Republicans and conservatives, who spent the latter stages of 2012 denouncing Silver as a hack propagandist, reported his latest projection with straight-faced earnestness. What once was skewed is now simply math.
What Silver has done is put a number to a widely acknowledged political reality: The GOP is well-positioned to make gains in 2014. The Atlantics David Graham points out that Democrats faced a similar reality in 2010, but refused to see it. Party officials are more publicly upfront about the dangers the Democrats face this time around than they were in 2010, but knowing that peril is ahead is different from knowing how to stop it. That rings true, and you know what does nothing to stop, slow or deflect an oncoming political wave? Complaining about skewed polls.
So what can be done? Last week I wrote about how Democrats would be smart to go on a carefully calibrated pro-Obamacare offensive it wont turn Obamacare into a winning issue, though it could help mollify the large swaths of voters who are frustrated by (but not ready to give up on) the health law. A good place to focus would be Obamacares expansion of Medicaid, the politics of which are increasingly favorable to the Democrats.
Salon
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 834 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nate Silver got you down? Why his forecast is more nuanced than you think (Original Post)
Capt. Obvious
Mar 2014
OP
TDale313
(7,820 posts)1. Good article.
"As usually happens in the wake of a Silver prediction, everyone lost their damn minds."
Pretty much sums it up. There was actually nothing Nate Silver said that a) most of us paying attention didn't already know or that b) means we are doomed. We're facing a tough one, we need to get ready to fight for this one. We can do it, but denying reality won't help.
okaawhatever
(9,461 posts)2. K & R nt
eallen
(2,953 posts)3. The most important caveat is this: Those are the odds now, and things will change before November.
And things we do will help change them.
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)4. Too late. Stick a fork in him, he's done...
Gothmog
(145,168 posts)5. This prediction is based on current information
A great deal can change between now and the November elections